Practice improves performance on a coronary anastomosis simulator, attending surgeon supervision does not

Daniel H. Enter, Xiaoying Lou, Dawn S. Hui, Adin Cristian Andrei, Hendrick B. Barner, Luke Sheen, Richard Lee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: Enthusiasm for simulation early in cardiothoracic surgery training is growing, yet evidence demonstrating its utility is limited. We examined the effect of supervised and unsupervised training on coronary anastomosis performance in a randomized trial among medical students. Methods: Forty-five medical students were recruited for this single-blinded, randomized controlled trial using a low-fidelity simulator. After viewing an instructional video, all participants attempted an anastomosis. Subsequently, the participants were randomized to 1 of 3 groups: control (n = 15), unsupervised training (n = 15), or supervised training with a cardiothoracic surgeon or fellow (n = 15). Both the supervised and unsupervised groups practiced for 1 hour per week. After 4 weeks, the participants repeated the anastomosis. All pre- and posttraining performances were videotaped and rated independently by 3 cardiothoracic surgeons blinded to the randomization. All raters scored 13 assessment items on a 1 to 5 (low-high) scale along with an overall pass/fail rating. Results: After the training period, all 3 groups showed significant improvements in composite scores (control: +0.52 ± 0.69 [P = .014], unsupervised: +1.05 ± 0.48 [P<.001], and supervised: +1.10 ± 0.84 [P<.001]). Compared with control group, both supervised (P = .005) and unsupervised trainees (P = .005) demonstrated a significant improvement. Between the supervised and unsupervised groups there were no statistically significant differences in composite scores. Conclusions: Practice on low-fidelity simulators enabled trainees to improve on a broad range of skills; however, the additional effect of attending-level supervision is limited. In an era of increasing staff surgeon responsibilities, unsupervised practice may be sufficient for inexperienced trainees.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)12-17.e2
JournalJournal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Volume149
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Medical Students
Control Groups
Random Allocation
Randomized Controlled Trials
Surgeons

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Practice improves performance on a coronary anastomosis simulator, attending surgeon supervision does not. / Enter, Daniel H.; Lou, Xiaoying; Hui, Dawn S.; Andrei, Adin Cristian; Barner, Hendrick B.; Sheen, Luke; Lee, Richard.

In: Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Vol. 149, No. 1, 01.01.2015, p. 12-17.e2.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Enter, Daniel H. ; Lou, Xiaoying ; Hui, Dawn S. ; Andrei, Adin Cristian ; Barner, Hendrick B. ; Sheen, Luke ; Lee, Richard. / Practice improves performance on a coronary anastomosis simulator, attending surgeon supervision does not. In: Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2015 ; Vol. 149, No. 1. pp. 12-17.e2.
@article{1938cf1688ef4e87bb310eca5ba765bc,
title = "Practice improves performance on a coronary anastomosis simulator, attending surgeon supervision does not",
abstract = "Objectives: Enthusiasm for simulation early in cardiothoracic surgery training is growing, yet evidence demonstrating its utility is limited. We examined the effect of supervised and unsupervised training on coronary anastomosis performance in a randomized trial among medical students. Methods: Forty-five medical students were recruited for this single-blinded, randomized controlled trial using a low-fidelity simulator. After viewing an instructional video, all participants attempted an anastomosis. Subsequently, the participants were randomized to 1 of 3 groups: control (n = 15), unsupervised training (n = 15), or supervised training with a cardiothoracic surgeon or fellow (n = 15). Both the supervised and unsupervised groups practiced for 1 hour per week. After 4 weeks, the participants repeated the anastomosis. All pre- and posttraining performances were videotaped and rated independently by 3 cardiothoracic surgeons blinded to the randomization. All raters scored 13 assessment items on a 1 to 5 (low-high) scale along with an overall pass/fail rating. Results: After the training period, all 3 groups showed significant improvements in composite scores (control: +0.52 ± 0.69 [P = .014], unsupervised: +1.05 ± 0.48 [P<.001], and supervised: +1.10 ± 0.84 [P<.001]). Compared with control group, both supervised (P = .005) and unsupervised trainees (P = .005) demonstrated a significant improvement. Between the supervised and unsupervised groups there were no statistically significant differences in composite scores. Conclusions: Practice on low-fidelity simulators enabled trainees to improve on a broad range of skills; however, the additional effect of attending-level supervision is limited. In an era of increasing staff surgeon responsibilities, unsupervised practice may be sufficient for inexperienced trainees.",
author = "Enter, {Daniel H.} and Xiaoying Lou and Hui, {Dawn S.} and Andrei, {Adin Cristian} and Barner, {Hendrick B.} and Luke Sheen and Richard Lee",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.09.029",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "149",
pages = "12--17.e2",
journal = "Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery",
issn = "0022-5223",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Practice improves performance on a coronary anastomosis simulator, attending surgeon supervision does not

AU - Enter, Daniel H.

AU - Lou, Xiaoying

AU - Hui, Dawn S.

AU - Andrei, Adin Cristian

AU - Barner, Hendrick B.

AU - Sheen, Luke

AU - Lee, Richard

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - Objectives: Enthusiasm for simulation early in cardiothoracic surgery training is growing, yet evidence demonstrating its utility is limited. We examined the effect of supervised and unsupervised training on coronary anastomosis performance in a randomized trial among medical students. Methods: Forty-five medical students were recruited for this single-blinded, randomized controlled trial using a low-fidelity simulator. After viewing an instructional video, all participants attempted an anastomosis. Subsequently, the participants were randomized to 1 of 3 groups: control (n = 15), unsupervised training (n = 15), or supervised training with a cardiothoracic surgeon or fellow (n = 15). Both the supervised and unsupervised groups practiced for 1 hour per week. After 4 weeks, the participants repeated the anastomosis. All pre- and posttraining performances were videotaped and rated independently by 3 cardiothoracic surgeons blinded to the randomization. All raters scored 13 assessment items on a 1 to 5 (low-high) scale along with an overall pass/fail rating. Results: After the training period, all 3 groups showed significant improvements in composite scores (control: +0.52 ± 0.69 [P = .014], unsupervised: +1.05 ± 0.48 [P<.001], and supervised: +1.10 ± 0.84 [P<.001]). Compared with control group, both supervised (P = .005) and unsupervised trainees (P = .005) demonstrated a significant improvement. Between the supervised and unsupervised groups there were no statistically significant differences in composite scores. Conclusions: Practice on low-fidelity simulators enabled trainees to improve on a broad range of skills; however, the additional effect of attending-level supervision is limited. In an era of increasing staff surgeon responsibilities, unsupervised practice may be sufficient for inexperienced trainees.

AB - Objectives: Enthusiasm for simulation early in cardiothoracic surgery training is growing, yet evidence demonstrating its utility is limited. We examined the effect of supervised and unsupervised training on coronary anastomosis performance in a randomized trial among medical students. Methods: Forty-five medical students were recruited for this single-blinded, randomized controlled trial using a low-fidelity simulator. After viewing an instructional video, all participants attempted an anastomosis. Subsequently, the participants were randomized to 1 of 3 groups: control (n = 15), unsupervised training (n = 15), or supervised training with a cardiothoracic surgeon or fellow (n = 15). Both the supervised and unsupervised groups practiced for 1 hour per week. After 4 weeks, the participants repeated the anastomosis. All pre- and posttraining performances were videotaped and rated independently by 3 cardiothoracic surgeons blinded to the randomization. All raters scored 13 assessment items on a 1 to 5 (low-high) scale along with an overall pass/fail rating. Results: After the training period, all 3 groups showed significant improvements in composite scores (control: +0.52 ± 0.69 [P = .014], unsupervised: +1.05 ± 0.48 [P<.001], and supervised: +1.10 ± 0.84 [P<.001]). Compared with control group, both supervised (P = .005) and unsupervised trainees (P = .005) demonstrated a significant improvement. Between the supervised and unsupervised groups there were no statistically significant differences in composite scores. Conclusions: Practice on low-fidelity simulators enabled trainees to improve on a broad range of skills; however, the additional effect of attending-level supervision is limited. In an era of increasing staff surgeon responsibilities, unsupervised practice may be sufficient for inexperienced trainees.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84922333261&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84922333261&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.09.029

DO - 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.09.029

M3 - Article

C2 - 25439774

AN - SCOPUS:84922333261

VL - 149

SP - 12-17.e2

JO - Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

JF - Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

SN - 0022-5223

IS - 1

ER -