Prediction of one repetition maximum (1-RM) strength from a 4-6 RM and a7-10 RM submaximal strength test in healthy young adult males

Paula Dohoney, Joseph A. Chromiak, Derek Lemire, Ben R. Abadie, Christopher Kovacs

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

39 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The purpose of this investigation was to determine if 1-RM strength could be predicted from a 4-6 RM submaximal strength test with a greater accuracy than the commonly used 7-10 submaximal strength test. Thirty-four healthy males between the ages of 19 and 32 participated in this study. Subjects completed 1-RM, 4-6 RM, and 7-10 RM strength assessments in random order with a minimum of 48 hours between each strength assessment. During each session, subjects performed strength assessments for the bench press, incline press, triceps extension, biceps curl, and leg extension. Multiple regression analysis was used to produce equations for predicting 1-RM strength from 4 to 6 or 7 to 10 repetition maximum tests. The 4-6 RM prediction equations improved the predictive accuracy of 1-RM strength compared to the 7-10 RM prediction equations based on the adjusted R2 and standard error of estimate. Since no injuries or symptoms of delayed onset of muscle soreness were reported during either the 7-10 RM or the 4-6 RM submaximal strength assessments, the results of this study indicate that when attempting to predict 1-RM strength in healthy, young, males, a 4-6 RM submaximal strength assessment appears to be the more accurate test.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)54-59
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Exercise Physiology Online
Volume5
Issue number3
StatePublished - Aug 1 2002

Fingerprint

Young Adult
Myalgia
Leg
Regression Analysis
Wounds and Injuries

Keywords

  • One repetition maximum (1-RM)
  • Strength prediction
  • Submaximal strength

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physiology (medical)

Cite this

Prediction of one repetition maximum (1-RM) strength from a 4-6 RM and a7-10 RM submaximal strength test in healthy young adult males. / Dohoney, Paula; Chromiak, Joseph A.; Lemire, Derek; Abadie, Ben R.; Kovacs, Christopher.

In: Journal of Exercise Physiology Online, Vol. 5, No. 3, 01.08.2002, p. 54-59.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Dohoney, Paula ; Chromiak, Joseph A. ; Lemire, Derek ; Abadie, Ben R. ; Kovacs, Christopher. / Prediction of one repetition maximum (1-RM) strength from a 4-6 RM and a7-10 RM submaximal strength test in healthy young adult males. In: Journal of Exercise Physiology Online. 2002 ; Vol. 5, No. 3. pp. 54-59.
@article{7c59412aa50d4af5a3299c6a93fb2467,
title = "Prediction of one repetition maximum (1-RM) strength from a 4-6 RM and a7-10 RM submaximal strength test in healthy young adult males",
abstract = "The purpose of this investigation was to determine if 1-RM strength could be predicted from a 4-6 RM submaximal strength test with a greater accuracy than the commonly used 7-10 submaximal strength test. Thirty-four healthy males between the ages of 19 and 32 participated in this study. Subjects completed 1-RM, 4-6 RM, and 7-10 RM strength assessments in random order with a minimum of 48 hours between each strength assessment. During each session, subjects performed strength assessments for the bench press, incline press, triceps extension, biceps curl, and leg extension. Multiple regression analysis was used to produce equations for predicting 1-RM strength from 4 to 6 or 7 to 10 repetition maximum tests. The 4-6 RM prediction equations improved the predictive accuracy of 1-RM strength compared to the 7-10 RM prediction equations based on the adjusted R2 and standard error of estimate. Since no injuries or symptoms of delayed onset of muscle soreness were reported during either the 7-10 RM or the 4-6 RM submaximal strength assessments, the results of this study indicate that when attempting to predict 1-RM strength in healthy, young, males, a 4-6 RM submaximal strength assessment appears to be the more accurate test.",
keywords = "One repetition maximum (1-RM), Strength prediction, Submaximal strength",
author = "Paula Dohoney and Chromiak, {Joseph A.} and Derek Lemire and Abadie, {Ben R.} and Christopher Kovacs",
year = "2002",
month = "8",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "5",
pages = "54--59",
journal = "Journal of Exercise Physiology Online",
issn = "1097-9751",
publisher = "American Society of Exercise Physiologists",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Prediction of one repetition maximum (1-RM) strength from a 4-6 RM and a7-10 RM submaximal strength test in healthy young adult males

AU - Dohoney, Paula

AU - Chromiak, Joseph A.

AU - Lemire, Derek

AU - Abadie, Ben R.

AU - Kovacs, Christopher

PY - 2002/8/1

Y1 - 2002/8/1

N2 - The purpose of this investigation was to determine if 1-RM strength could be predicted from a 4-6 RM submaximal strength test with a greater accuracy than the commonly used 7-10 submaximal strength test. Thirty-four healthy males between the ages of 19 and 32 participated in this study. Subjects completed 1-RM, 4-6 RM, and 7-10 RM strength assessments in random order with a minimum of 48 hours between each strength assessment. During each session, subjects performed strength assessments for the bench press, incline press, triceps extension, biceps curl, and leg extension. Multiple regression analysis was used to produce equations for predicting 1-RM strength from 4 to 6 or 7 to 10 repetition maximum tests. The 4-6 RM prediction equations improved the predictive accuracy of 1-RM strength compared to the 7-10 RM prediction equations based on the adjusted R2 and standard error of estimate. Since no injuries or symptoms of delayed onset of muscle soreness were reported during either the 7-10 RM or the 4-6 RM submaximal strength assessments, the results of this study indicate that when attempting to predict 1-RM strength in healthy, young, males, a 4-6 RM submaximal strength assessment appears to be the more accurate test.

AB - The purpose of this investigation was to determine if 1-RM strength could be predicted from a 4-6 RM submaximal strength test with a greater accuracy than the commonly used 7-10 submaximal strength test. Thirty-four healthy males between the ages of 19 and 32 participated in this study. Subjects completed 1-RM, 4-6 RM, and 7-10 RM strength assessments in random order with a minimum of 48 hours between each strength assessment. During each session, subjects performed strength assessments for the bench press, incline press, triceps extension, biceps curl, and leg extension. Multiple regression analysis was used to produce equations for predicting 1-RM strength from 4 to 6 or 7 to 10 repetition maximum tests. The 4-6 RM prediction equations improved the predictive accuracy of 1-RM strength compared to the 7-10 RM prediction equations based on the adjusted R2 and standard error of estimate. Since no injuries or symptoms of delayed onset of muscle soreness were reported during either the 7-10 RM or the 4-6 RM submaximal strength assessments, the results of this study indicate that when attempting to predict 1-RM strength in healthy, young, males, a 4-6 RM submaximal strength assessment appears to be the more accurate test.

KW - One repetition maximum (1-RM)

KW - Strength prediction

KW - Submaximal strength

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=3242766756&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=3242766756&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 5

SP - 54

EP - 59

JO - Journal of Exercise Physiology Online

JF - Journal of Exercise Physiology Online

SN - 1097-9751

IS - 3

ER -