Prediction of risk for cesarean delivery in term nulliparas: a comparison of neural network and multiple logistic regression models

Ali Al Housseini, Tondra Newman, Alan Cox, Lawrence D Devoe

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: We sought to develop a neural network (NN) to predict the risk for cesarean delivery (CD) in term nulliparas. Study Design: Using software (BrainMaker for Windows, Version 3.0; California Scientific Software, Nevada City, CA), we trained an NN with 225 patients obtained by chart review and included for nulliparity, singleton vertex > 36 weeks' gestation, and reassuring fetal heart rate on admission. Training inputs included several maternal and fetal clinical variables. Two logistic regression (LR) models using 225 and 600 patients (LR225 and LR600, respectively) were developed. The NN and LR models were tested for prediction of CD in a set of 100 patients not used for development. Results: The NN, LR225, and LR600 correctly predicted 53%, 26%, and 32% of the patients with CD and 88%, 95%, and 95% of the patients with vaginal delivery, respectively. Conclusion: Compared with LRs, the NN was slightly better in predicting CD and was similar for predicting vaginal delivery in nulliparas with term singletons.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)113.e1-113.e6
JournalAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Volume201
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2009

Fingerprint

Logistic Models
Software Design
Fetal Heart Rate
Parity
Software
Mothers
Pregnancy

Keywords

  • cesarean
  • neural network
  • prediction
  • vaginal

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

Prediction of risk for cesarean delivery in term nulliparas : a comparison of neural network and multiple logistic regression models. / Al Housseini, Ali; Newman, Tondra; Cox, Alan; Devoe, Lawrence D.

In: American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vol. 201, No. 1, 01.01.2009, p. 113.e1-113.e6.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0507f5cfee2a4250806f98025b6b63c7,
title = "Prediction of risk for cesarean delivery in term nulliparas: a comparison of neural network and multiple logistic regression models",
abstract = "Objective: We sought to develop a neural network (NN) to predict the risk for cesarean delivery (CD) in term nulliparas. Study Design: Using software (BrainMaker for Windows, Version 3.0; California Scientific Software, Nevada City, CA), we trained an NN with 225 patients obtained by chart review and included for nulliparity, singleton vertex > 36 weeks' gestation, and reassuring fetal heart rate on admission. Training inputs included several maternal and fetal clinical variables. Two logistic regression (LR) models using 225 and 600 patients (LR225 and LR600, respectively) were developed. The NN and LR models were tested for prediction of CD in a set of 100 patients not used for development. Results: The NN, LR225, and LR600 correctly predicted 53{\%}, 26{\%}, and 32{\%} of the patients with CD and 88{\%}, 95{\%}, and 95{\%} of the patients with vaginal delivery, respectively. Conclusion: Compared with LRs, the NN was slightly better in predicting CD and was similar for predicting vaginal delivery in nulliparas with term singletons.",
keywords = "cesarean, neural network, prediction, vaginal",
author = "{Al Housseini}, Ali and Tondra Newman and Alan Cox and Devoe, {Lawrence D}",
year = "2009",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ajog.2009.05.001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "201",
pages = "113.e1--113.e6",
journal = "American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology",
issn = "0002-9378",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Prediction of risk for cesarean delivery in term nulliparas

T2 - a comparison of neural network and multiple logistic regression models

AU - Al Housseini, Ali

AU - Newman, Tondra

AU - Cox, Alan

AU - Devoe, Lawrence D

PY - 2009/1/1

Y1 - 2009/1/1

N2 - Objective: We sought to develop a neural network (NN) to predict the risk for cesarean delivery (CD) in term nulliparas. Study Design: Using software (BrainMaker for Windows, Version 3.0; California Scientific Software, Nevada City, CA), we trained an NN with 225 patients obtained by chart review and included for nulliparity, singleton vertex > 36 weeks' gestation, and reassuring fetal heart rate on admission. Training inputs included several maternal and fetal clinical variables. Two logistic regression (LR) models using 225 and 600 patients (LR225 and LR600, respectively) were developed. The NN and LR models were tested for prediction of CD in a set of 100 patients not used for development. Results: The NN, LR225, and LR600 correctly predicted 53%, 26%, and 32% of the patients with CD and 88%, 95%, and 95% of the patients with vaginal delivery, respectively. Conclusion: Compared with LRs, the NN was slightly better in predicting CD and was similar for predicting vaginal delivery in nulliparas with term singletons.

AB - Objective: We sought to develop a neural network (NN) to predict the risk for cesarean delivery (CD) in term nulliparas. Study Design: Using software (BrainMaker for Windows, Version 3.0; California Scientific Software, Nevada City, CA), we trained an NN with 225 patients obtained by chart review and included for nulliparity, singleton vertex > 36 weeks' gestation, and reassuring fetal heart rate on admission. Training inputs included several maternal and fetal clinical variables. Two logistic regression (LR) models using 225 and 600 patients (LR225 and LR600, respectively) were developed. The NN and LR models were tested for prediction of CD in a set of 100 patients not used for development. Results: The NN, LR225, and LR600 correctly predicted 53%, 26%, and 32% of the patients with CD and 88%, 95%, and 95% of the patients with vaginal delivery, respectively. Conclusion: Compared with LRs, the NN was slightly better in predicting CD and was similar for predicting vaginal delivery in nulliparas with term singletons.

KW - cesarean

KW - neural network

KW - prediction

KW - vaginal

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=67649321281&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=67649321281&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.05.001

DO - 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.05.001

M3 - Article

C2 - 19576377

AN - SCOPUS:67649321281

VL - 201

SP - 113.e1-113.e6

JO - American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

JF - American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

SN - 0002-9378

IS - 1

ER -