Preliminary findings from a prospective, randomized trial of two tongue-base surgeries for sleep-disordered breathing

Adrian J. Thomas, Martha Chavoya, David J Terris

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

43 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study compares the efficacy of 2 tongue-base surgical procedures in the treatment of patients with moderate to severe sleep-disordered breathing. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: We conducted a prospective, randomized crossover surgical trial at a university hospital. METHODS: Seventeen patients with moderate to severe sleep-disordered breathing and Fujita type II upper airway collapse for whom conservative treatment failed were enrolled into an institutional review board-approved surgical protocol. They were randomly assigned to undergo palatopharyngoplasty combined with either tongue advancement (mandibular osteotomy) or tongue suspension. Parameters assessed included severity of sleep-disordered breathing (polysomnography), sleepiness (Epworth Sleepiness Scale), and anatomic changes (upper airway endoscopy), as well as demographic factors. Patients not achieving satisfactory improvement in their condition were offered nonsurgical management or additional surgical treatment that varied based on the postoperative assessment but included crossing over to the other tongue surgical procedure. RESULTS: Nine of the 17 patients were randomized to the tongue suspension group, and 8 to the tongue advancement group. In the 9 tongue suspension patients, Epworth Sleepiness Scale scores fell from 12.1 to 4.1 (P = 0.007). Airway collapse for all 9 patients measured on Müller maneuver improved, by a mean of 64% (P = 0.0006) at the palate and 83% (P = 0.0003) at the base of the tongue. In the 8 tongue advancement patients, Epworth Sleepiness Scale scores fell from a mean of 13.3 to 5.4 (P = 0.004). Airway collapse for 5 of 8 patients measured on Müller maneuver improved by a mean of 31% (P = 0.1) at the palate and 75% (P = 0.03) at the base of the tongue. CONCLUSION: Prospective, randomized trials of tongue-base surgery for sleep-disordered breathing are possible. Preliminary findings from the current protocol reveal a slight advantage of tongue suspension over tongue advancement.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)539-546
Number of pages8
JournalOtolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery
Volume129
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2003

Fingerprint

Sleep Apnea Syndromes
Tongue
Suspensions
Palate
Mandibular Osteotomy
Polysomnography
Research Ethics Committees
Cross-Over Studies
Endoscopy
Demography

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Otorhinolaryngology

Cite this

Preliminary findings from a prospective, randomized trial of two tongue-base surgeries for sleep-disordered breathing. / Thomas, Adrian J.; Chavoya, Martha; Terris, David J.

In: Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Vol. 129, No. 5, 01.01.2003, p. 539-546.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{82a386bd6014436fad521e53cb5d867a,
title = "Preliminary findings from a prospective, randomized trial of two tongue-base surgeries for sleep-disordered breathing",
abstract = "OBJECTIVES: This study compares the efficacy of 2 tongue-base surgical procedures in the treatment of patients with moderate to severe sleep-disordered breathing. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: We conducted a prospective, randomized crossover surgical trial at a university hospital. METHODS: Seventeen patients with moderate to severe sleep-disordered breathing and Fujita type II upper airway collapse for whom conservative treatment failed were enrolled into an institutional review board-approved surgical protocol. They were randomly assigned to undergo palatopharyngoplasty combined with either tongue advancement (mandibular osteotomy) or tongue suspension. Parameters assessed included severity of sleep-disordered breathing (polysomnography), sleepiness (Epworth Sleepiness Scale), and anatomic changes (upper airway endoscopy), as well as demographic factors. Patients not achieving satisfactory improvement in their condition were offered nonsurgical management or additional surgical treatment that varied based on the postoperative assessment but included crossing over to the other tongue surgical procedure. RESULTS: Nine of the 17 patients were randomized to the tongue suspension group, and 8 to the tongue advancement group. In the 9 tongue suspension patients, Epworth Sleepiness Scale scores fell from 12.1 to 4.1 (P = 0.007). Airway collapse for all 9 patients measured on M{\"u}ller maneuver improved, by a mean of 64{\%} (P = 0.0006) at the palate and 83{\%} (P = 0.0003) at the base of the tongue. In the 8 tongue advancement patients, Epworth Sleepiness Scale scores fell from a mean of 13.3 to 5.4 (P = 0.004). Airway collapse for 5 of 8 patients measured on M{\"u}ller maneuver improved by a mean of 31{\%} (P = 0.1) at the palate and 75{\%} (P = 0.03) at the base of the tongue. CONCLUSION: Prospective, randomized trials of tongue-base surgery for sleep-disordered breathing are possible. Preliminary findings from the current protocol reveal a slight advantage of tongue suspension over tongue advancement.",
author = "Thomas, {Adrian J.} and Martha Chavoya and Terris, {David J}",
year = "2003",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/S0194-5998(03)00728-9",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "129",
pages = "539--546",
journal = "Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery (United States)",
issn = "0194-5998",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Preliminary findings from a prospective, randomized trial of two tongue-base surgeries for sleep-disordered breathing

AU - Thomas, Adrian J.

AU - Chavoya, Martha

AU - Terris, David J

PY - 2003/1/1

Y1 - 2003/1/1

N2 - OBJECTIVES: This study compares the efficacy of 2 tongue-base surgical procedures in the treatment of patients with moderate to severe sleep-disordered breathing. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: We conducted a prospective, randomized crossover surgical trial at a university hospital. METHODS: Seventeen patients with moderate to severe sleep-disordered breathing and Fujita type II upper airway collapse for whom conservative treatment failed were enrolled into an institutional review board-approved surgical protocol. They were randomly assigned to undergo palatopharyngoplasty combined with either tongue advancement (mandibular osteotomy) or tongue suspension. Parameters assessed included severity of sleep-disordered breathing (polysomnography), sleepiness (Epworth Sleepiness Scale), and anatomic changes (upper airway endoscopy), as well as demographic factors. Patients not achieving satisfactory improvement in their condition were offered nonsurgical management or additional surgical treatment that varied based on the postoperative assessment but included crossing over to the other tongue surgical procedure. RESULTS: Nine of the 17 patients were randomized to the tongue suspension group, and 8 to the tongue advancement group. In the 9 tongue suspension patients, Epworth Sleepiness Scale scores fell from 12.1 to 4.1 (P = 0.007). Airway collapse for all 9 patients measured on Müller maneuver improved, by a mean of 64% (P = 0.0006) at the palate and 83% (P = 0.0003) at the base of the tongue. In the 8 tongue advancement patients, Epworth Sleepiness Scale scores fell from a mean of 13.3 to 5.4 (P = 0.004). Airway collapse for 5 of 8 patients measured on Müller maneuver improved by a mean of 31% (P = 0.1) at the palate and 75% (P = 0.03) at the base of the tongue. CONCLUSION: Prospective, randomized trials of tongue-base surgery for sleep-disordered breathing are possible. Preliminary findings from the current protocol reveal a slight advantage of tongue suspension over tongue advancement.

AB - OBJECTIVES: This study compares the efficacy of 2 tongue-base surgical procedures in the treatment of patients with moderate to severe sleep-disordered breathing. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: We conducted a prospective, randomized crossover surgical trial at a university hospital. METHODS: Seventeen patients with moderate to severe sleep-disordered breathing and Fujita type II upper airway collapse for whom conservative treatment failed were enrolled into an institutional review board-approved surgical protocol. They were randomly assigned to undergo palatopharyngoplasty combined with either tongue advancement (mandibular osteotomy) or tongue suspension. Parameters assessed included severity of sleep-disordered breathing (polysomnography), sleepiness (Epworth Sleepiness Scale), and anatomic changes (upper airway endoscopy), as well as demographic factors. Patients not achieving satisfactory improvement in their condition were offered nonsurgical management or additional surgical treatment that varied based on the postoperative assessment but included crossing over to the other tongue surgical procedure. RESULTS: Nine of the 17 patients were randomized to the tongue suspension group, and 8 to the tongue advancement group. In the 9 tongue suspension patients, Epworth Sleepiness Scale scores fell from 12.1 to 4.1 (P = 0.007). Airway collapse for all 9 patients measured on Müller maneuver improved, by a mean of 64% (P = 0.0006) at the palate and 83% (P = 0.0003) at the base of the tongue. In the 8 tongue advancement patients, Epworth Sleepiness Scale scores fell from a mean of 13.3 to 5.4 (P = 0.004). Airway collapse for 5 of 8 patients measured on Müller maneuver improved by a mean of 31% (P = 0.1) at the palate and 75% (P = 0.03) at the base of the tongue. CONCLUSION: Prospective, randomized trials of tongue-base surgery for sleep-disordered breathing are possible. Preliminary findings from the current protocol reveal a slight advantage of tongue suspension over tongue advancement.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0242662767&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0242662767&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0194-5998(03)00728-9

DO - 10.1016/S0194-5998(03)00728-9

M3 - Article

C2 - 14595277

AN - SCOPUS:0242662767

VL - 129

SP - 539

EP - 546

JO - Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery (United States)

JF - Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery (United States)

SN - 0194-5998

IS - 5

ER -