Primary Care Residents Lack Comfort and Experience with Alcohol Screening and Brief Intervention

A Multi-Site Survey

Kristy Barnes Le, J Aaron Johnson, J. Paul Seale, Hunter Woodall, Denice C. Clark, David C. Parish, David P. Miller

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Approximately one in six adults in the United States (U.S.) binge drinks. The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommends that primary care physicians screen patients for such hazardous alcohol use, and when warranted, deliver a brief intervention. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to determine primary care residents’ current practices, perceived barriers and confidence with conducting alcohol screening and brief interventions (SBI). DESIGN: This was a multi-site, cross-sectional survey conducted from March 2010 through December 2012. PARTICIPANTS: We invited all residents in six primary care residency programs (three internal medicine programs and three family medicine programs) to participate. Of 244 residents, 210 completed the survey (response rate 86 %). MAIN MEASURES: Our survey assessed residents’ alcohol screening practices (instruments used and frequency of screening), perceived barriers to discussing alcohol, brief intervention content, and self-rated ability to help hazardous drinkers. To determine the quality of brief interventions delivered, we examined how often residents reported including the three key recommended elements of feedback, advice, and goal-setting. KEY RESULTS: Most residents (60 %, 125/208) reported “usually” or “always” screening patients for alcohol misuse at the initial clinic visit, but few residents routinely screened patients at subsequent acute-care (17 %, 35/208) or chronic-care visits (33 %, 68/208). Only 19 % (39/210) of residents used screening instruments capable of detecting binge drinking. The most frequently reported barrier to SBI was lack of adequate training (54 %, 108/202), and only 21 % (43/208) of residents felt confident they could help at -risk drinkers. When residents did perform a brief intervention, only 24 % (49/208) “usually” or “always” included the three recommended elements. CONCLUSIONS: A minority of residents in this multi-site study appropriately screen or intervene with at-risk alcohol users. To equip residents to effectively address hazardous alcohol use, there is a critical need for educational and clinic interventions to support alcohol-related SBI.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)790-796
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of General Internal Medicine
Volume30
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 26 2015

Fingerprint

Primary Health Care
Alcohols
Binge Drinking
Aptitude
Surveys and Questionnaires
Primary Care Physicians
Advisory Committees
Ambulatory Care
Internship and Residency
Internal Medicine
Cross-Sectional Studies
Medicine

Keywords

  • SBIRT
  • alcohol SBI
  • alcohol screening
  • brief intervention
  • primary care screening
  • residency training

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Internal Medicine

Cite this

Primary Care Residents Lack Comfort and Experience with Alcohol Screening and Brief Intervention : A Multi-Site Survey. / Le, Kristy Barnes; Johnson, J Aaron; Seale, J. Paul; Woodall, Hunter; Clark, Denice C.; Parish, David C.; Miller, David P.

In: Journal of General Internal Medicine, Vol. 30, No. 6, 26.06.2015, p. 790-796.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Le, Kristy Barnes ; Johnson, J Aaron ; Seale, J. Paul ; Woodall, Hunter ; Clark, Denice C. ; Parish, David C. ; Miller, David P. / Primary Care Residents Lack Comfort and Experience with Alcohol Screening and Brief Intervention : A Multi-Site Survey. In: Journal of General Internal Medicine. 2015 ; Vol. 30, No. 6. pp. 790-796.
@article{8a5c8d53513345f0bece72add3e2c7ba,
title = "Primary Care Residents Lack Comfort and Experience with Alcohol Screening and Brief Intervention: A Multi-Site Survey",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Approximately one in six adults in the United States (U.S.) binge drinks. The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommends that primary care physicians screen patients for such hazardous alcohol use, and when warranted, deliver a brief intervention. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to determine primary care residents’ current practices, perceived barriers and confidence with conducting alcohol screening and brief interventions (SBI). DESIGN: This was a multi-site, cross-sectional survey conducted from March 2010 through December 2012. PARTICIPANTS: We invited all residents in six primary care residency programs (three internal medicine programs and three family medicine programs) to participate. Of 244 residents, 210 completed the survey (response rate 86 {\%}). MAIN MEASURES: Our survey assessed residents’ alcohol screening practices (instruments used and frequency of screening), perceived barriers to discussing alcohol, brief intervention content, and self-rated ability to help hazardous drinkers. To determine the quality of brief interventions delivered, we examined how often residents reported including the three key recommended elements of feedback, advice, and goal-setting. KEY RESULTS: Most residents (60 {\%}, 125/208) reported “usually” or “always” screening patients for alcohol misuse at the initial clinic visit, but few residents routinely screened patients at subsequent acute-care (17 {\%}, 35/208) or chronic-care visits (33 {\%}, 68/208). Only 19 {\%} (39/210) of residents used screening instruments capable of detecting binge drinking. The most frequently reported barrier to SBI was lack of adequate training (54 {\%}, 108/202), and only 21 {\%} (43/208) of residents felt confident they could help at -risk drinkers. When residents did perform a brief intervention, only 24 {\%} (49/208) “usually” or “always” included the three recommended elements. CONCLUSIONS: A minority of residents in this multi-site study appropriately screen or intervene with at-risk alcohol users. To equip residents to effectively address hazardous alcohol use, there is a critical need for educational and clinic interventions to support alcohol-related SBI.",
keywords = "SBIRT, alcohol SBI, alcohol screening, brief intervention, primary care screening, residency training",
author = "Le, {Kristy Barnes} and Johnson, {J Aaron} and Seale, {J. Paul} and Hunter Woodall and Clark, {Denice C.} and Parish, {David C.} and Miller, {David P.}",
year = "2015",
month = "6",
day = "26",
doi = "10.1007/s11606-015-3184-y",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "30",
pages = "790--796",
journal = "Journal of General Internal Medicine",
issn = "0884-8734",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Primary Care Residents Lack Comfort and Experience with Alcohol Screening and Brief Intervention

T2 - A Multi-Site Survey

AU - Le, Kristy Barnes

AU - Johnson, J Aaron

AU - Seale, J. Paul

AU - Woodall, Hunter

AU - Clark, Denice C.

AU - Parish, David C.

AU - Miller, David P.

PY - 2015/6/26

Y1 - 2015/6/26

N2 - BACKGROUND: Approximately one in six adults in the United States (U.S.) binge drinks. The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommends that primary care physicians screen patients for such hazardous alcohol use, and when warranted, deliver a brief intervention. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to determine primary care residents’ current practices, perceived barriers and confidence with conducting alcohol screening and brief interventions (SBI). DESIGN: This was a multi-site, cross-sectional survey conducted from March 2010 through December 2012. PARTICIPANTS: We invited all residents in six primary care residency programs (three internal medicine programs and three family medicine programs) to participate. Of 244 residents, 210 completed the survey (response rate 86 %). MAIN MEASURES: Our survey assessed residents’ alcohol screening practices (instruments used and frequency of screening), perceived barriers to discussing alcohol, brief intervention content, and self-rated ability to help hazardous drinkers. To determine the quality of brief interventions delivered, we examined how often residents reported including the three key recommended elements of feedback, advice, and goal-setting. KEY RESULTS: Most residents (60 %, 125/208) reported “usually” or “always” screening patients for alcohol misuse at the initial clinic visit, but few residents routinely screened patients at subsequent acute-care (17 %, 35/208) or chronic-care visits (33 %, 68/208). Only 19 % (39/210) of residents used screening instruments capable of detecting binge drinking. The most frequently reported barrier to SBI was lack of adequate training (54 %, 108/202), and only 21 % (43/208) of residents felt confident they could help at -risk drinkers. When residents did perform a brief intervention, only 24 % (49/208) “usually” or “always” included the three recommended elements. CONCLUSIONS: A minority of residents in this multi-site study appropriately screen or intervene with at-risk alcohol users. To equip residents to effectively address hazardous alcohol use, there is a critical need for educational and clinic interventions to support alcohol-related SBI.

AB - BACKGROUND: Approximately one in six adults in the United States (U.S.) binge drinks. The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommends that primary care physicians screen patients for such hazardous alcohol use, and when warranted, deliver a brief intervention. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to determine primary care residents’ current practices, perceived barriers and confidence with conducting alcohol screening and brief interventions (SBI). DESIGN: This was a multi-site, cross-sectional survey conducted from March 2010 through December 2012. PARTICIPANTS: We invited all residents in six primary care residency programs (three internal medicine programs and three family medicine programs) to participate. Of 244 residents, 210 completed the survey (response rate 86 %). MAIN MEASURES: Our survey assessed residents’ alcohol screening practices (instruments used and frequency of screening), perceived barriers to discussing alcohol, brief intervention content, and self-rated ability to help hazardous drinkers. To determine the quality of brief interventions delivered, we examined how often residents reported including the three key recommended elements of feedback, advice, and goal-setting. KEY RESULTS: Most residents (60 %, 125/208) reported “usually” or “always” screening patients for alcohol misuse at the initial clinic visit, but few residents routinely screened patients at subsequent acute-care (17 %, 35/208) or chronic-care visits (33 %, 68/208). Only 19 % (39/210) of residents used screening instruments capable of detecting binge drinking. The most frequently reported barrier to SBI was lack of adequate training (54 %, 108/202), and only 21 % (43/208) of residents felt confident they could help at -risk drinkers. When residents did perform a brief intervention, only 24 % (49/208) “usually” or “always” included the three recommended elements. CONCLUSIONS: A minority of residents in this multi-site study appropriately screen or intervene with at-risk alcohol users. To equip residents to effectively address hazardous alcohol use, there is a critical need for educational and clinic interventions to support alcohol-related SBI.

KW - SBIRT

KW - alcohol SBI

KW - alcohol screening

KW - brief intervention

KW - primary care screening

KW - residency training

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84929843522&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84929843522&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11606-015-3184-y

DO - 10.1007/s11606-015-3184-y

M3 - Article

VL - 30

SP - 790

EP - 796

JO - Journal of General Internal Medicine

JF - Journal of General Internal Medicine

SN - 0884-8734

IS - 6

ER -