Professionalism in pathology

A case-based approach as a potential educational tool

Ronald E. Domen, Kristen Johnson, Richard Michael Conran, Robert D. Hoffman, Miriam D. Post, Jacob J. Steinberg, Mark D. Brissette, Dita A. Gratzinger, Cindy B. McCloskey, Patricia M. Raciti, Cory Anthony Roberts, Amyn Mohammed Rojiani, Suzanne Z. Powell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Context.-Professionalism issues in residency training can be difficult to assess and manage. Generational or rolebased differences may also exist between faculty and residents as to what constitutes unprofessional behavior and how to manage it. Objective.-To examine and compare how faculty and residents would approach the same 5 case scenarios detailing various aspects of unprofessional behavior. Design.-Five case scenarios highlighting various unprofessional behaviors were presented in a workshop at an annual meeting of pathology department chairs, residency program directors, and undergraduate pathology medical educators (ie, pathologists involved in medical student pathology education). The same cases were presented to a cohort of pathology residents currently in training. A standard set of responses were offered to the participants, polling results were collected electronically, and results were compared. Results.-Faculty and residents were fairly consistent within their respective groups. In a subset of cases, faculty were more likely to favor working with the individual in the scenario, whereas resident respondents were more likely to favor either no response or a severe response. Generational or role-based differences were also potentially evident. Conclusions.-Assessing expectations and differences around professionalism for both faculty and residents should be considered as part of any educational and management approach for professionalism. Although a level of generational differences appears to be evident in this study regarding the recognition and management of unprofessional behavior, there was also agreement in some cases. Further exploration into the discrepant responses between faculty and residents may prove useful in developing educational, assessment, and remediation resources.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)215-219
Number of pages5
JournalArchives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine
Volume141
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2017

Fingerprint

Professional Misconduct
Pathology
Internship and Residency
Educational Measurement
Education
Medical Students
Professionalism

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Medical Laboratory Technology

Cite this

Domen, R. E., Johnson, K., Conran, R. M., Hoffman, R. D., Post, M. D., Steinberg, J. J., ... Powell, S. Z. (2017). Professionalism in pathology: A case-based approach as a potential educational tool. Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, 141(2), 215-219. https://doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2016-0217-CP

Professionalism in pathology : A case-based approach as a potential educational tool. / Domen, Ronald E.; Johnson, Kristen; Conran, Richard Michael; Hoffman, Robert D.; Post, Miriam D.; Steinberg, Jacob J.; Brissette, Mark D.; Gratzinger, Dita A.; McCloskey, Cindy B.; Raciti, Patricia M.; Roberts, Cory Anthony; Rojiani, Amyn Mohammed; Powell, Suzanne Z.

In: Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Vol. 141, No. 2, 01.02.2017, p. 215-219.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Domen, RE, Johnson, K, Conran, RM, Hoffman, RD, Post, MD, Steinberg, JJ, Brissette, MD, Gratzinger, DA, McCloskey, CB, Raciti, PM, Roberts, CA, Rojiani, AM & Powell, SZ 2017, 'Professionalism in pathology: A case-based approach as a potential educational tool', Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, vol. 141, no. 2, pp. 215-219. https://doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2016-0217-CP
Domen, Ronald E. ; Johnson, Kristen ; Conran, Richard Michael ; Hoffman, Robert D. ; Post, Miriam D. ; Steinberg, Jacob J. ; Brissette, Mark D. ; Gratzinger, Dita A. ; McCloskey, Cindy B. ; Raciti, Patricia M. ; Roberts, Cory Anthony ; Rojiani, Amyn Mohammed ; Powell, Suzanne Z. / Professionalism in pathology : A case-based approach as a potential educational tool. In: Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine. 2017 ; Vol. 141, No. 2. pp. 215-219.
@article{5dfd37fb551643a686bd9fcda60014f2,
title = "Professionalism in pathology: A case-based approach as a potential educational tool",
abstract = "Context.-Professionalism issues in residency training can be difficult to assess and manage. Generational or rolebased differences may also exist between faculty and residents as to what constitutes unprofessional behavior and how to manage it. Objective.-To examine and compare how faculty and residents would approach the same 5 case scenarios detailing various aspects of unprofessional behavior. Design.-Five case scenarios highlighting various unprofessional behaviors were presented in a workshop at an annual meeting of pathology department chairs, residency program directors, and undergraduate pathology medical educators (ie, pathologists involved in medical student pathology education). The same cases were presented to a cohort of pathology residents currently in training. A standard set of responses were offered to the participants, polling results were collected electronically, and results were compared. Results.-Faculty and residents were fairly consistent within their respective groups. In a subset of cases, faculty were more likely to favor working with the individual in the scenario, whereas resident respondents were more likely to favor either no response or a severe response. Generational or role-based differences were also potentially evident. Conclusions.-Assessing expectations and differences around professionalism for both faculty and residents should be considered as part of any educational and management approach for professionalism. Although a level of generational differences appears to be evident in this study regarding the recognition and management of unprofessional behavior, there was also agreement in some cases. Further exploration into the discrepant responses between faculty and residents may prove useful in developing educational, assessment, and remediation resources.",
author = "Domen, {Ronald E.} and Kristen Johnson and Conran, {Richard Michael} and Hoffman, {Robert D.} and Post, {Miriam D.} and Steinberg, {Jacob J.} and Brissette, {Mark D.} and Gratzinger, {Dita A.} and McCloskey, {Cindy B.} and Raciti, {Patricia M.} and Roberts, {Cory Anthony} and Rojiani, {Amyn Mohammed} and Powell, {Suzanne Z.}",
year = "2017",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.5858/arpa.2016-0217-CP",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "141",
pages = "215--219",
journal = "Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine",
issn = "0003-9985",
publisher = "College of American Pathologists",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Professionalism in pathology

T2 - A case-based approach as a potential educational tool

AU - Domen, Ronald E.

AU - Johnson, Kristen

AU - Conran, Richard Michael

AU - Hoffman, Robert D.

AU - Post, Miriam D.

AU - Steinberg, Jacob J.

AU - Brissette, Mark D.

AU - Gratzinger, Dita A.

AU - McCloskey, Cindy B.

AU - Raciti, Patricia M.

AU - Roberts, Cory Anthony

AU - Rojiani, Amyn Mohammed

AU - Powell, Suzanne Z.

PY - 2017/2/1

Y1 - 2017/2/1

N2 - Context.-Professionalism issues in residency training can be difficult to assess and manage. Generational or rolebased differences may also exist between faculty and residents as to what constitutes unprofessional behavior and how to manage it. Objective.-To examine and compare how faculty and residents would approach the same 5 case scenarios detailing various aspects of unprofessional behavior. Design.-Five case scenarios highlighting various unprofessional behaviors were presented in a workshop at an annual meeting of pathology department chairs, residency program directors, and undergraduate pathology medical educators (ie, pathologists involved in medical student pathology education). The same cases were presented to a cohort of pathology residents currently in training. A standard set of responses were offered to the participants, polling results were collected electronically, and results were compared. Results.-Faculty and residents were fairly consistent within their respective groups. In a subset of cases, faculty were more likely to favor working with the individual in the scenario, whereas resident respondents were more likely to favor either no response or a severe response. Generational or role-based differences were also potentially evident. Conclusions.-Assessing expectations and differences around professionalism for both faculty and residents should be considered as part of any educational and management approach for professionalism. Although a level of generational differences appears to be evident in this study regarding the recognition and management of unprofessional behavior, there was also agreement in some cases. Further exploration into the discrepant responses between faculty and residents may prove useful in developing educational, assessment, and remediation resources.

AB - Context.-Professionalism issues in residency training can be difficult to assess and manage. Generational or rolebased differences may also exist between faculty and residents as to what constitutes unprofessional behavior and how to manage it. Objective.-To examine and compare how faculty and residents would approach the same 5 case scenarios detailing various aspects of unprofessional behavior. Design.-Five case scenarios highlighting various unprofessional behaviors were presented in a workshop at an annual meeting of pathology department chairs, residency program directors, and undergraduate pathology medical educators (ie, pathologists involved in medical student pathology education). The same cases were presented to a cohort of pathology residents currently in training. A standard set of responses were offered to the participants, polling results were collected electronically, and results were compared. Results.-Faculty and residents were fairly consistent within their respective groups. In a subset of cases, faculty were more likely to favor working with the individual in the scenario, whereas resident respondents were more likely to favor either no response or a severe response. Generational or role-based differences were also potentially evident. Conclusions.-Assessing expectations and differences around professionalism for both faculty and residents should be considered as part of any educational and management approach for professionalism. Although a level of generational differences appears to be evident in this study regarding the recognition and management of unprofessional behavior, there was also agreement in some cases. Further exploration into the discrepant responses between faculty and residents may prove useful in developing educational, assessment, and remediation resources.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85011650198&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85011650198&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5858/arpa.2016-0217-CP

DO - 10.5858/arpa.2016-0217-CP

M3 - Article

VL - 141

SP - 215

EP - 219

JO - Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine

JF - Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine

SN - 0003-9985

IS - 2

ER -