Prognosis in the intensive care unit: Finding accurate and useful estimates for counseling patients

Adrienne G. Randolph, Gordon H. Guyatt, W. Scott Richardson, Gordon Bernard, Roger Bone, Christian Brun-Buisson, James Calvin, Jean Carlet, Frank Cerra, Don Chalfin, Antonio Dans, Gordon Doig, Gray Ellrodt, Mitchell Fink, Charles Fisher, Paul Hébert, Daren Heyland, Kevin Inman, Roman Jaeschke, Sean KeenanPhilip Kernerman, Mitchell Levy, Lawrence Maldonado, John Marshall, Maureen Meade, John Russell, Frank Rutledge, Michael Shabot, William Sibbald, Mark Smithies, Charles Sprung, Jean Louis Vincent, Deborah J. Cook

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

26 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: Counseling critically ill patients and their families about what the future is likely to hold requires accurate prognostic information. Our goal is to teach clinicians how to find and critically appraise prognostic studies that examine homogeneous populations. Clinical Example: An article describing the outcomes of a group of children who are in a prolonged, persistent vegetative state. Recommendations: The validity of prognostic studies is increased when: a) the sample of patients is representative; b) patients are homogeneous with respect to prognostic risk; c) follow-up is sufficient to minimize the possibility that the missing patients could alter the interpretation of the results; and d) health outcomes are evaluated, using objective and unbiased criteria. The likelihood of these outcomes over time and the precision around these probability estimates should be easily understandable. Before using the results of these studies to counsel patients and families, practitioners should ensure that the patients in the study and their management are similar to the patient in question, and that follow-up of the subjects is sufficiently long. Conclusions: The criteria outlined in this article may assist clinicians in interpreting articles describing the prognosis of patients with similar clinical conditions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)767-772
Number of pages6
JournalCritical care medicine
Volume26
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - May 14 1998

Fingerprint

Intensive Care Units
Counseling
Persistent Vegetative State
Patient Advocacy
Critical Illness
Health
Population

Keywords

  • Critical appraisal
  • Epidemiology
  • Evidence based medicine
  • Outcomes research
  • Prediction
  • Prognosis
  • Quality of care
  • Risk adjustment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Cite this

Prognosis in the intensive care unit : Finding accurate and useful estimates for counseling patients. / Randolph, Adrienne G.; Guyatt, Gordon H.; Richardson, W. Scott; Bernard, Gordon; Bone, Roger; Brun-Buisson, Christian; Calvin, James; Carlet, Jean; Cerra, Frank; Chalfin, Don; Dans, Antonio; Doig, Gordon; Ellrodt, Gray; Fink, Mitchell; Fisher, Charles; Hébert, Paul; Heyland, Daren; Inman, Kevin; Jaeschke, Roman; Keenan, Sean; Kernerman, Philip; Levy, Mitchell; Maldonado, Lawrence; Marshall, John; Meade, Maureen; Russell, John; Rutledge, Frank; Shabot, Michael; Sibbald, William; Smithies, Mark; Sprung, Charles; Vincent, Jean Louis; Cook, Deborah J.

In: Critical care medicine, Vol. 26, No. 4, 14.05.1998, p. 767-772.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Randolph, AG, Guyatt, GH, Richardson, WS, Bernard, G, Bone, R, Brun-Buisson, C, Calvin, J, Carlet, J, Cerra, F, Chalfin, D, Dans, A, Doig, G, Ellrodt, G, Fink, M, Fisher, C, Hébert, P, Heyland, D, Inman, K, Jaeschke, R, Keenan, S, Kernerman, P, Levy, M, Maldonado, L, Marshall, J, Meade, M, Russell, J, Rutledge, F, Shabot, M, Sibbald, W, Smithies, M, Sprung, C, Vincent, JL & Cook, DJ 1998, 'Prognosis in the intensive care unit: Finding accurate and useful estimates for counseling patients', Critical care medicine, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 767-772. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003246-199804000-00031
Randolph, Adrienne G. ; Guyatt, Gordon H. ; Richardson, W. Scott ; Bernard, Gordon ; Bone, Roger ; Brun-Buisson, Christian ; Calvin, James ; Carlet, Jean ; Cerra, Frank ; Chalfin, Don ; Dans, Antonio ; Doig, Gordon ; Ellrodt, Gray ; Fink, Mitchell ; Fisher, Charles ; Hébert, Paul ; Heyland, Daren ; Inman, Kevin ; Jaeschke, Roman ; Keenan, Sean ; Kernerman, Philip ; Levy, Mitchell ; Maldonado, Lawrence ; Marshall, John ; Meade, Maureen ; Russell, John ; Rutledge, Frank ; Shabot, Michael ; Sibbald, William ; Smithies, Mark ; Sprung, Charles ; Vincent, Jean Louis ; Cook, Deborah J. / Prognosis in the intensive care unit : Finding accurate and useful estimates for counseling patients. In: Critical care medicine. 1998 ; Vol. 26, No. 4. pp. 767-772.
@article{64d536669e3549e4bcef2c970e55aaf3,
title = "Prognosis in the intensive care unit: Finding accurate and useful estimates for counseling patients",
abstract = "Objectives: Counseling critically ill patients and their families about what the future is likely to hold requires accurate prognostic information. Our goal is to teach clinicians how to find and critically appraise prognostic studies that examine homogeneous populations. Clinical Example: An article describing the outcomes of a group of children who are in a prolonged, persistent vegetative state. Recommendations: The validity of prognostic studies is increased when: a) the sample of patients is representative; b) patients are homogeneous with respect to prognostic risk; c) follow-up is sufficient to minimize the possibility that the missing patients could alter the interpretation of the results; and d) health outcomes are evaluated, using objective and unbiased criteria. The likelihood of these outcomes over time and the precision around these probability estimates should be easily understandable. Before using the results of these studies to counsel patients and families, practitioners should ensure that the patients in the study and their management are similar to the patient in question, and that follow-up of the subjects is sufficiently long. Conclusions: The criteria outlined in this article may assist clinicians in interpreting articles describing the prognosis of patients with similar clinical conditions.",
keywords = "Critical appraisal, Epidemiology, Evidence based medicine, Outcomes research, Prediction, Prognosis, Quality of care, Risk adjustment",
author = "Randolph, {Adrienne G.} and Guyatt, {Gordon H.} and Richardson, {W. Scott} and Gordon Bernard and Roger Bone and Christian Brun-Buisson and James Calvin and Jean Carlet and Frank Cerra and Don Chalfin and Antonio Dans and Gordon Doig and Gray Ellrodt and Mitchell Fink and Charles Fisher and Paul H{\'e}bert and Daren Heyland and Kevin Inman and Roman Jaeschke and Sean Keenan and Philip Kernerman and Mitchell Levy and Lawrence Maldonado and John Marshall and Maureen Meade and John Russell and Frank Rutledge and Michael Shabot and William Sibbald and Mark Smithies and Charles Sprung and Vincent, {Jean Louis} and Cook, {Deborah J.}",
year = "1998",
month = "5",
day = "14",
doi = "10.1097/00003246-199804000-00031",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "26",
pages = "767--772",
journal = "Critical Care Medicine",
issn = "0090-3493",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Prognosis in the intensive care unit

T2 - Finding accurate and useful estimates for counseling patients

AU - Randolph, Adrienne G.

AU - Guyatt, Gordon H.

AU - Richardson, W. Scott

AU - Bernard, Gordon

AU - Bone, Roger

AU - Brun-Buisson, Christian

AU - Calvin, James

AU - Carlet, Jean

AU - Cerra, Frank

AU - Chalfin, Don

AU - Dans, Antonio

AU - Doig, Gordon

AU - Ellrodt, Gray

AU - Fink, Mitchell

AU - Fisher, Charles

AU - Hébert, Paul

AU - Heyland, Daren

AU - Inman, Kevin

AU - Jaeschke, Roman

AU - Keenan, Sean

AU - Kernerman, Philip

AU - Levy, Mitchell

AU - Maldonado, Lawrence

AU - Marshall, John

AU - Meade, Maureen

AU - Russell, John

AU - Rutledge, Frank

AU - Shabot, Michael

AU - Sibbald, William

AU - Smithies, Mark

AU - Sprung, Charles

AU - Vincent, Jean Louis

AU - Cook, Deborah J.

PY - 1998/5/14

Y1 - 1998/5/14

N2 - Objectives: Counseling critically ill patients and their families about what the future is likely to hold requires accurate prognostic information. Our goal is to teach clinicians how to find and critically appraise prognostic studies that examine homogeneous populations. Clinical Example: An article describing the outcomes of a group of children who are in a prolonged, persistent vegetative state. Recommendations: The validity of prognostic studies is increased when: a) the sample of patients is representative; b) patients are homogeneous with respect to prognostic risk; c) follow-up is sufficient to minimize the possibility that the missing patients could alter the interpretation of the results; and d) health outcomes are evaluated, using objective and unbiased criteria. The likelihood of these outcomes over time and the precision around these probability estimates should be easily understandable. Before using the results of these studies to counsel patients and families, practitioners should ensure that the patients in the study and their management are similar to the patient in question, and that follow-up of the subjects is sufficiently long. Conclusions: The criteria outlined in this article may assist clinicians in interpreting articles describing the prognosis of patients with similar clinical conditions.

AB - Objectives: Counseling critically ill patients and their families about what the future is likely to hold requires accurate prognostic information. Our goal is to teach clinicians how to find and critically appraise prognostic studies that examine homogeneous populations. Clinical Example: An article describing the outcomes of a group of children who are in a prolonged, persistent vegetative state. Recommendations: The validity of prognostic studies is increased when: a) the sample of patients is representative; b) patients are homogeneous with respect to prognostic risk; c) follow-up is sufficient to minimize the possibility that the missing patients could alter the interpretation of the results; and d) health outcomes are evaluated, using objective and unbiased criteria. The likelihood of these outcomes over time and the precision around these probability estimates should be easily understandable. Before using the results of these studies to counsel patients and families, practitioners should ensure that the patients in the study and their management are similar to the patient in question, and that follow-up of the subjects is sufficiently long. Conclusions: The criteria outlined in this article may assist clinicians in interpreting articles describing the prognosis of patients with similar clinical conditions.

KW - Critical appraisal

KW - Epidemiology

KW - Evidence based medicine

KW - Outcomes research

KW - Prediction

KW - Prognosis

KW - Quality of care

KW - Risk adjustment

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031941805&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031941805&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/00003246-199804000-00031

DO - 10.1097/00003246-199804000-00031

M3 - Article

C2 - 9559618

AN - SCOPUS:0031941805

VL - 26

SP - 767

EP - 772

JO - Critical Care Medicine

JF - Critical Care Medicine

SN - 0090-3493

IS - 4

ER -