Prognostic components of computerized fetal biophysical testing

Lawrence D Devoe, Ramon A. Castillo, Nancy Searle, John S. Searle

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Fetal biophysical testing with arbitrary scores for fetal heart rate (FHR), breathing movements, body movements, tone, and amniotic fluid volume has not proved to be highly sensitive or significantly better than FHR testing alone. Using a computerized analysis system for simultaneously acquired biophysical variables, we studied 200 high-risk fetuses near term. The dynamic parameters obtained for each fetus were compared with established nomograms, and overall test results correlated with the presence or absence of perinatal mortality, fetal distress, a 5-minute Apgar score <7, and intrauterine growth retardation for those delivered within 7 days of the last test. A test was considered abnormal if two or more parameters fell more than 2 standard deviations from the population mean. A decreased incidence of fetal body movements, amniotic fluid volume, and frequency of FHR acceleration were the most common individual test abnormalities. Test sensitivity (86%), specificity (89%), positive predictive value (75%), and negative predictive value (93%) exceeded those of the “standard” scoring approach and correctly identified all fetuses with malformation, perinatal death, and 19 of 22 fetuses with intrauterine growth retardation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1144-1148
Number of pages5
JournalAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Volume158
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1988

Fingerprint

Fetal Heart Rate
Fetus
Fetal Growth Retardation
Amniotic Fluid
Fetal Movement
Fetal Distress
Nomograms
Apgar Score
Perinatal Mortality
Respiration
Sensitivity and Specificity
Incidence
Population

Keywords

  • Fetal biophysical testing
  • computers

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

Prognostic components of computerized fetal biophysical testing. / Devoe, Lawrence D; Castillo, Ramon A.; Searle, Nancy; Searle, John S.

In: American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vol. 158, No. 5, 01.01.1988, p. 1144-1148.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Devoe, Lawrence D ; Castillo, Ramon A. ; Searle, Nancy ; Searle, John S. / Prognostic components of computerized fetal biophysical testing. In: American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 1988 ; Vol. 158, No. 5. pp. 1144-1148.
@article{510f5c435c6944e590b71d6b958658c3,
title = "Prognostic components of computerized fetal biophysical testing",
abstract = "Fetal biophysical testing with arbitrary scores for fetal heart rate (FHR), breathing movements, body movements, tone, and amniotic fluid volume has not proved to be highly sensitive or significantly better than FHR testing alone. Using a computerized analysis system for simultaneously acquired biophysical variables, we studied 200 high-risk fetuses near term. The dynamic parameters obtained for each fetus were compared with established nomograms, and overall test results correlated with the presence or absence of perinatal mortality, fetal distress, a 5-minute Apgar score <7, and intrauterine growth retardation for those delivered within 7 days of the last test. A test was considered abnormal if two or more parameters fell more than 2 standard deviations from the population mean. A decreased incidence of fetal body movements, amniotic fluid volume, and frequency of FHR acceleration were the most common individual test abnormalities. Test sensitivity (86{\%}), specificity (89{\%}), positive predictive value (75{\%}), and negative predictive value (93{\%}) exceeded those of the “standard” scoring approach and correctly identified all fetuses with malformation, perinatal death, and 19 of 22 fetuses with intrauterine growth retardation.",
keywords = "Fetal biophysical testing, computers",
author = "Devoe, {Lawrence D} and Castillo, {Ramon A.} and Nancy Searle and Searle, {John S.}",
year = "1988",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/0002-9378(88)90242-6",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "158",
pages = "1144--1148",
journal = "American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology",
issn = "0002-9378",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Prognostic components of computerized fetal biophysical testing

AU - Devoe, Lawrence D

AU - Castillo, Ramon A.

AU - Searle, Nancy

AU - Searle, John S.

PY - 1988/1/1

Y1 - 1988/1/1

N2 - Fetal biophysical testing with arbitrary scores for fetal heart rate (FHR), breathing movements, body movements, tone, and amniotic fluid volume has not proved to be highly sensitive or significantly better than FHR testing alone. Using a computerized analysis system for simultaneously acquired biophysical variables, we studied 200 high-risk fetuses near term. The dynamic parameters obtained for each fetus were compared with established nomograms, and overall test results correlated with the presence or absence of perinatal mortality, fetal distress, a 5-minute Apgar score <7, and intrauterine growth retardation for those delivered within 7 days of the last test. A test was considered abnormal if two or more parameters fell more than 2 standard deviations from the population mean. A decreased incidence of fetal body movements, amniotic fluid volume, and frequency of FHR acceleration were the most common individual test abnormalities. Test sensitivity (86%), specificity (89%), positive predictive value (75%), and negative predictive value (93%) exceeded those of the “standard” scoring approach and correctly identified all fetuses with malformation, perinatal death, and 19 of 22 fetuses with intrauterine growth retardation.

AB - Fetal biophysical testing with arbitrary scores for fetal heart rate (FHR), breathing movements, body movements, tone, and amniotic fluid volume has not proved to be highly sensitive or significantly better than FHR testing alone. Using a computerized analysis system for simultaneously acquired biophysical variables, we studied 200 high-risk fetuses near term. The dynamic parameters obtained for each fetus were compared with established nomograms, and overall test results correlated with the presence or absence of perinatal mortality, fetal distress, a 5-minute Apgar score <7, and intrauterine growth retardation for those delivered within 7 days of the last test. A test was considered abnormal if two or more parameters fell more than 2 standard deviations from the population mean. A decreased incidence of fetal body movements, amniotic fluid volume, and frequency of FHR acceleration were the most common individual test abnormalities. Test sensitivity (86%), specificity (89%), positive predictive value (75%), and negative predictive value (93%) exceeded those of the “standard” scoring approach and correctly identified all fetuses with malformation, perinatal death, and 19 of 22 fetuses with intrauterine growth retardation.

KW - Fetal biophysical testing

KW - computers

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0023950266&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0023950266&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0002-9378(88)90242-6

DO - 10.1016/0002-9378(88)90242-6

M3 - Article

VL - 158

SP - 1144

EP - 1148

JO - American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

JF - American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

SN - 0002-9378

IS - 5

ER -