Program directors’ use and perceptions of the online STFM resource library: A cera report

Dean Seehusen, Christy J.W. Ledford

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The online STFM Resource Library (RL) was launched in 2005 by STFM with a grant from the National Library of Medicine. This study was conducted to assess the RL usage patterns and RL-related perceptions of family medicine program directors (PDs) to guide potential process improvement. METHODS: Questions about the RL were included in a larger omnibus survey conducted by the CAFM Educational Research Alliance (CERA). The sampling frame for the survey was all US family medicine PDs as identified by the Association of Family Medicine Residency Directors. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 50.9% (224/440). A total of 170 (75.9%) had previously used the RL. PDs from university-affiliated programs were more likely to have used the RL (92.7% versus 73.7%). Forty percent of respondents reported the RL was easy to use, and 25.3% agreed that the RL is more valuable than other medical education web sites. Respondents who had been PD for less than 5 years reported a greater relative advantage of the RL (31.9% versus 17.9%). Women reported higher relative advantage for the RL than men (34.5% versus 20.5%). CONCLUSIONS: PDs who have used the site report relatively low satisfaction with its ease of use and relative value. Most do not consider it to be more useful than other medical education web sites. Women PDs rate the resource higher than men. The RL is a widely used resource that could be updated to make it easier to use and more valuable to family medicine educators.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)393-396
Number of pages4
JournalFamily Medicine
Volume47
Issue number5
StatePublished - Jan 1 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Libraries
Medicine
Medical Education
National Library of Medicine (U.S.)
Organized Financing
Internship and Residency
Surveys and Questionnaires

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Family Practice

Cite this

Program directors’ use and perceptions of the online STFM resource library : A cera report. / Seehusen, Dean; Ledford, Christy J.W.

In: Family Medicine, Vol. 47, No. 5, 01.01.2015, p. 393-396.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c71535568999457f86b0bf7790a91603,
title = "Program directors’ use and perceptions of the online STFM resource library: A cera report",
abstract = "BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The online STFM Resource Library (RL) was launched in 2005 by STFM with a grant from the National Library of Medicine. This study was conducted to assess the RL usage patterns and RL-related perceptions of family medicine program directors (PDs) to guide potential process improvement. METHODS: Questions about the RL were included in a larger omnibus survey conducted by the CAFM Educational Research Alliance (CERA). The sampling frame for the survey was all US family medicine PDs as identified by the Association of Family Medicine Residency Directors. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 50.9{\%} (224/440). A total of 170 (75.9{\%}) had previously used the RL. PDs from university-affiliated programs were more likely to have used the RL (92.7{\%} versus 73.7{\%}). Forty percent of respondents reported the RL was easy to use, and 25.3{\%} agreed that the RL is more valuable than other medical education web sites. Respondents who had been PD for less than 5 years reported a greater relative advantage of the RL (31.9{\%} versus 17.9{\%}). Women reported higher relative advantage for the RL than men (34.5{\%} versus 20.5{\%}). CONCLUSIONS: PDs who have used the site report relatively low satisfaction with its ease of use and relative value. Most do not consider it to be more useful than other medical education web sites. Women PDs rate the resource higher than men. The RL is a widely used resource that could be updated to make it easier to use and more valuable to family medicine educators.",
author = "Dean Seehusen and Ledford, {Christy J.W.}",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "47",
pages = "393--396",
journal = "Family Medicine",
issn = "0742-3225",
publisher = "Society of Teachers of Family Medicine",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Program directors’ use and perceptions of the online STFM resource library

T2 - A cera report

AU - Seehusen, Dean

AU - Ledford, Christy J.W.

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The online STFM Resource Library (RL) was launched in 2005 by STFM with a grant from the National Library of Medicine. This study was conducted to assess the RL usage patterns and RL-related perceptions of family medicine program directors (PDs) to guide potential process improvement. METHODS: Questions about the RL were included in a larger omnibus survey conducted by the CAFM Educational Research Alliance (CERA). The sampling frame for the survey was all US family medicine PDs as identified by the Association of Family Medicine Residency Directors. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 50.9% (224/440). A total of 170 (75.9%) had previously used the RL. PDs from university-affiliated programs were more likely to have used the RL (92.7% versus 73.7%). Forty percent of respondents reported the RL was easy to use, and 25.3% agreed that the RL is more valuable than other medical education web sites. Respondents who had been PD for less than 5 years reported a greater relative advantage of the RL (31.9% versus 17.9%). Women reported higher relative advantage for the RL than men (34.5% versus 20.5%). CONCLUSIONS: PDs who have used the site report relatively low satisfaction with its ease of use and relative value. Most do not consider it to be more useful than other medical education web sites. Women PDs rate the resource higher than men. The RL is a widely used resource that could be updated to make it easier to use and more valuable to family medicine educators.

AB - BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The online STFM Resource Library (RL) was launched in 2005 by STFM with a grant from the National Library of Medicine. This study was conducted to assess the RL usage patterns and RL-related perceptions of family medicine program directors (PDs) to guide potential process improvement. METHODS: Questions about the RL were included in a larger omnibus survey conducted by the CAFM Educational Research Alliance (CERA). The sampling frame for the survey was all US family medicine PDs as identified by the Association of Family Medicine Residency Directors. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 50.9% (224/440). A total of 170 (75.9%) had previously used the RL. PDs from university-affiliated programs were more likely to have used the RL (92.7% versus 73.7%). Forty percent of respondents reported the RL was easy to use, and 25.3% agreed that the RL is more valuable than other medical education web sites. Respondents who had been PD for less than 5 years reported a greater relative advantage of the RL (31.9% versus 17.9%). Women reported higher relative advantage for the RL than men (34.5% versus 20.5%). CONCLUSIONS: PDs who have used the site report relatively low satisfaction with its ease of use and relative value. Most do not consider it to be more useful than other medical education web sites. Women PDs rate the resource higher than men. The RL is a widely used resource that could be updated to make it easier to use and more valuable to family medicine educators.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84929073335&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84929073335&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 25905884

AN - SCOPUS:84929073335

VL - 47

SP - 393

EP - 396

JO - Family Medicine

JF - Family Medicine

SN - 0742-3225

IS - 5

ER -