Prospective assessment in newborns of diabetes autoimmunity (PANDA): Maternal understanding of infant diabetes risk

Stacy K. Carmichael, Suzanne Bennett Johnson, Amy Baughcum, Kerri North, Diane Hopkins, Margaret G. Dukes, Jin-Xiong She, Desmond A. Schatz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

35 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To assess accuracy of mothers' understanding of their newborns' genetic risk for type 1 diabetes and to identify predictors of the comprehension and retention of genetic information. Methods: Mothers of 435 newborns genetically screened at birth were informed of the infant's risk for type 1 diabetes using a standard script that provided both categorical and numerical risk information. The mothers' comprehension and retention of this information were assessed by structured interview on two occasions, ∼3.6 weeks and ∼3.9 months postnotification. Results: At the initial interview, 73.1% of mothers gave a correct estimate of their child's genetic risk, 3.2% overestimated risk, 13.3% underestimated risk, and 10.3% could not recall risk at all. At the follow-up interview, fewer mothers (61.9%) correctly estimated their child's risk and more mothers (24.4%) underestimated their child's risk. Maternal accuracy was associated with maternal education, ethnic minority status, infant risk status, maternal ability to spontaneously recall both categorical and numerical risk estimates, and length of time since risk notification. Underestimation of risk was associated with maternal education, family history of diabetes, time since risk notification, and maternal anxiety about the baby's risk. Conclusion: The accuracy of mothers' recall of infant risk declines over time, with an increasing number of mothers underestimating the infant's risk. Effective risk communication strategies need to be developed and incorporated into genetic screening programs.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)77-83
Number of pages7
JournalGenetics in Medicine
Volume5
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2003

Fingerprint

Autoimmunity
Mothers
Newborn Infant
Interviews
Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus
Education
Aptitude
Genetic Testing

Keywords

  • Genetic screening
  • Newborn
  • Parental understanding
  • Risk communication
  • Type 1 diabetes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Genetics(clinical)

Cite this

Carmichael, S. K., Johnson, S. B., Baughcum, A., North, K., Hopkins, D., Dukes, M. G., ... Schatz, D. A. (2003). Prospective assessment in newborns of diabetes autoimmunity (PANDA): Maternal understanding of infant diabetes risk. Genetics in Medicine, 5(2), 77-83. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.GIM.0000055196.67008.1B

Prospective assessment in newborns of diabetes autoimmunity (PANDA) : Maternal understanding of infant diabetes risk. / Carmichael, Stacy K.; Johnson, Suzanne Bennett; Baughcum, Amy; North, Kerri; Hopkins, Diane; Dukes, Margaret G.; She, Jin-Xiong; Schatz, Desmond A.

In: Genetics in Medicine, Vol. 5, No. 2, 01.03.2003, p. 77-83.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Carmichael, Stacy K. ; Johnson, Suzanne Bennett ; Baughcum, Amy ; North, Kerri ; Hopkins, Diane ; Dukes, Margaret G. ; She, Jin-Xiong ; Schatz, Desmond A. / Prospective assessment in newborns of diabetes autoimmunity (PANDA) : Maternal understanding of infant diabetes risk. In: Genetics in Medicine. 2003 ; Vol. 5, No. 2. pp. 77-83.
@article{429d99b4d83543a797ed187ce39b010c,
title = "Prospective assessment in newborns of diabetes autoimmunity (PANDA): Maternal understanding of infant diabetes risk",
abstract = "Purpose: To assess accuracy of mothers' understanding of their newborns' genetic risk for type 1 diabetes and to identify predictors of the comprehension and retention of genetic information. Methods: Mothers of 435 newborns genetically screened at birth were informed of the infant's risk for type 1 diabetes using a standard script that provided both categorical and numerical risk information. The mothers' comprehension and retention of this information were assessed by structured interview on two occasions, ∼3.6 weeks and ∼3.9 months postnotification. Results: At the initial interview, 73.1{\%} of mothers gave a correct estimate of their child's genetic risk, 3.2{\%} overestimated risk, 13.3{\%} underestimated risk, and 10.3{\%} could not recall risk at all. At the follow-up interview, fewer mothers (61.9{\%}) correctly estimated their child's risk and more mothers (24.4{\%}) underestimated their child's risk. Maternal accuracy was associated with maternal education, ethnic minority status, infant risk status, maternal ability to spontaneously recall both categorical and numerical risk estimates, and length of time since risk notification. Underestimation of risk was associated with maternal education, family history of diabetes, time since risk notification, and maternal anxiety about the baby's risk. Conclusion: The accuracy of mothers' recall of infant risk declines over time, with an increasing number of mothers underestimating the infant's risk. Effective risk communication strategies need to be developed and incorporated into genetic screening programs.",
keywords = "Genetic screening, Newborn, Parental understanding, Risk communication, Type 1 diabetes",
author = "Carmichael, {Stacy K.} and Johnson, {Suzanne Bennett} and Amy Baughcum and Kerri North and Diane Hopkins and Dukes, {Margaret G.} and Jin-Xiong She and Schatz, {Desmond A.}",
year = "2003",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/01.GIM.0000055196.67008.1B",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "5",
pages = "77--83",
journal = "Genetics in Medicine",
issn = "1098-3600",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Prospective assessment in newborns of diabetes autoimmunity (PANDA)

T2 - Maternal understanding of infant diabetes risk

AU - Carmichael, Stacy K.

AU - Johnson, Suzanne Bennett

AU - Baughcum, Amy

AU - North, Kerri

AU - Hopkins, Diane

AU - Dukes, Margaret G.

AU - She, Jin-Xiong

AU - Schatz, Desmond A.

PY - 2003/3/1

Y1 - 2003/3/1

N2 - Purpose: To assess accuracy of mothers' understanding of their newborns' genetic risk for type 1 diabetes and to identify predictors of the comprehension and retention of genetic information. Methods: Mothers of 435 newborns genetically screened at birth were informed of the infant's risk for type 1 diabetes using a standard script that provided both categorical and numerical risk information. The mothers' comprehension and retention of this information were assessed by structured interview on two occasions, ∼3.6 weeks and ∼3.9 months postnotification. Results: At the initial interview, 73.1% of mothers gave a correct estimate of their child's genetic risk, 3.2% overestimated risk, 13.3% underestimated risk, and 10.3% could not recall risk at all. At the follow-up interview, fewer mothers (61.9%) correctly estimated their child's risk and more mothers (24.4%) underestimated their child's risk. Maternal accuracy was associated with maternal education, ethnic minority status, infant risk status, maternal ability to spontaneously recall both categorical and numerical risk estimates, and length of time since risk notification. Underestimation of risk was associated with maternal education, family history of diabetes, time since risk notification, and maternal anxiety about the baby's risk. Conclusion: The accuracy of mothers' recall of infant risk declines over time, with an increasing number of mothers underestimating the infant's risk. Effective risk communication strategies need to be developed and incorporated into genetic screening programs.

AB - Purpose: To assess accuracy of mothers' understanding of their newborns' genetic risk for type 1 diabetes and to identify predictors of the comprehension and retention of genetic information. Methods: Mothers of 435 newborns genetically screened at birth were informed of the infant's risk for type 1 diabetes using a standard script that provided both categorical and numerical risk information. The mothers' comprehension and retention of this information were assessed by structured interview on two occasions, ∼3.6 weeks and ∼3.9 months postnotification. Results: At the initial interview, 73.1% of mothers gave a correct estimate of their child's genetic risk, 3.2% overestimated risk, 13.3% underestimated risk, and 10.3% could not recall risk at all. At the follow-up interview, fewer mothers (61.9%) correctly estimated their child's risk and more mothers (24.4%) underestimated their child's risk. Maternal accuracy was associated with maternal education, ethnic minority status, infant risk status, maternal ability to spontaneously recall both categorical and numerical risk estimates, and length of time since risk notification. Underestimation of risk was associated with maternal education, family history of diabetes, time since risk notification, and maternal anxiety about the baby's risk. Conclusion: The accuracy of mothers' recall of infant risk declines over time, with an increasing number of mothers underestimating the infant's risk. Effective risk communication strategies need to be developed and incorporated into genetic screening programs.

KW - Genetic screening

KW - Newborn

KW - Parental understanding

KW - Risk communication

KW - Type 1 diabetes

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0043062874&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0043062874&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/01.GIM.0000055196.67008.1B

DO - 10.1097/01.GIM.0000055196.67008.1B

M3 - Article

C2 - 12644776

AN - SCOPUS:0043062874

VL - 5

SP - 77

EP - 83

JO - Genetics in Medicine

JF - Genetics in Medicine

SN - 1098-3600

IS - 2

ER -