Prospective comparison of emergency physician-performed venous ultrasound and CT venography for deep venous thrombosis

Stephen A Shiver, Matthew L Lyon, Michael Blaivas, Srikar Adhikari

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Venous thromboembolic disease is a major cause of mortality and morbidity. Objectives: The aim of this study is to compare emergency physician-performed ultrasound (EPPU) of the lower extremities with CT venography (CTV) in emergency department (ED) patients undergoing workup for pulmonary embolism (PE). Methods: This was a prospective study performed at a busy academic ED. Adult patients (>18) undergoing workup for PE were eligible for the study; enrollment was based on a convenience sample, during hours worked by the investigators. Study patients underwent EPPU of the lower extremities followed by CT angiogram (CTA) of the chest and CTV of the lower extremities. Sensitivity and specificity of the ultrasound examination were calculated using CTV as the gold standard. Results: A total of 61 patients were enrolled. Of 61 patients, 50 (82%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 72%-91%) had negative workups; 11 (18%; 95% CI, 8%-27%) were noted to have PE on CTA; 6 (10%; 95% CI, 2%-17%) were noted to have lower extremity deep venous thrombosis (DVT) on both EPPU and CTV evaluation; whereas 1 patient was found to have an external iliac DVT on CTV, which was not noted on EPPU. All patients with DVT (by either EPPU or CTV) were found to have PE on CTA. Sensitivity and specificity of EPPU when compared to CTV in the diagnosis of DVT was 86% (95% CI, 42%-99%) and 100% (95% CI, 91%-100%), respectively. Conclusions: Emergency physician-performed ultrasound produces results consistent with CTV in the diagnosis of femoropopliteal DVT. More proximal clots are not evaluated with EPPU and thus may result in a false negative.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)354-358
Number of pages5
JournalAmerican Journal of Emergency Medicine
Volume28
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2010

Fingerprint

Phlebography
Venous Thrombosis
Emergencies
Physicians
Pulmonary Embolism
Confidence Intervals
Lower Extremity
Angiography
Hospital Emergency Service
Sensitivity and Specificity
Thorax
Research Personnel
Prospective Studies
Morbidity
Mortality

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

Prospective comparison of emergency physician-performed venous ultrasound and CT venography for deep venous thrombosis. / Shiver, Stephen A; Lyon, Matthew L; Blaivas, Michael; Adhikari, Srikar.

In: American Journal of Emergency Medicine, Vol. 28, No. 3, 01.03.2010, p. 354-358.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{cd676f4904a5417385fff0f60336127f,
title = "Prospective comparison of emergency physician-performed venous ultrasound and CT venography for deep venous thrombosis",
abstract = "Background: Venous thromboembolic disease is a major cause of mortality and morbidity. Objectives: The aim of this study is to compare emergency physician-performed ultrasound (EPPU) of the lower extremities with CT venography (CTV) in emergency department (ED) patients undergoing workup for pulmonary embolism (PE). Methods: This was a prospective study performed at a busy academic ED. Adult patients (>18) undergoing workup for PE were eligible for the study; enrollment was based on a convenience sample, during hours worked by the investigators. Study patients underwent EPPU of the lower extremities followed by CT angiogram (CTA) of the chest and CTV of the lower extremities. Sensitivity and specificity of the ultrasound examination were calculated using CTV as the gold standard. Results: A total of 61 patients were enrolled. Of 61 patients, 50 (82{\%}; 95{\%} confidence interval [CI], 72{\%}-91{\%}) had negative workups; 11 (18{\%}; 95{\%} CI, 8{\%}-27{\%}) were noted to have PE on CTA; 6 (10{\%}; 95{\%} CI, 2{\%}-17{\%}) were noted to have lower extremity deep venous thrombosis (DVT) on both EPPU and CTV evaluation; whereas 1 patient was found to have an external iliac DVT on CTV, which was not noted on EPPU. All patients with DVT (by either EPPU or CTV) were found to have PE on CTA. Sensitivity and specificity of EPPU when compared to CTV in the diagnosis of DVT was 86{\%} (95{\%} CI, 42{\%}-99{\%}) and 100{\%} (95{\%} CI, 91{\%}-100{\%}), respectively. Conclusions: Emergency physician-performed ultrasound produces results consistent with CTV in the diagnosis of femoropopliteal DVT. More proximal clots are not evaluated with EPPU and thus may result in a false negative.",
author = "Shiver, {Stephen A} and Lyon, {Matthew L} and Michael Blaivas and Srikar Adhikari",
year = "2010",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ajem.2009.01.009",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "28",
pages = "354--358",
journal = "American Journal of Emergency Medicine",
issn = "0735-6757",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Prospective comparison of emergency physician-performed venous ultrasound and CT venography for deep venous thrombosis

AU - Shiver, Stephen A

AU - Lyon, Matthew L

AU - Blaivas, Michael

AU - Adhikari, Srikar

PY - 2010/3/1

Y1 - 2010/3/1

N2 - Background: Venous thromboembolic disease is a major cause of mortality and morbidity. Objectives: The aim of this study is to compare emergency physician-performed ultrasound (EPPU) of the lower extremities with CT venography (CTV) in emergency department (ED) patients undergoing workup for pulmonary embolism (PE). Methods: This was a prospective study performed at a busy academic ED. Adult patients (>18) undergoing workup for PE were eligible for the study; enrollment was based on a convenience sample, during hours worked by the investigators. Study patients underwent EPPU of the lower extremities followed by CT angiogram (CTA) of the chest and CTV of the lower extremities. Sensitivity and specificity of the ultrasound examination were calculated using CTV as the gold standard. Results: A total of 61 patients were enrolled. Of 61 patients, 50 (82%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 72%-91%) had negative workups; 11 (18%; 95% CI, 8%-27%) were noted to have PE on CTA; 6 (10%; 95% CI, 2%-17%) were noted to have lower extremity deep venous thrombosis (DVT) on both EPPU and CTV evaluation; whereas 1 patient was found to have an external iliac DVT on CTV, which was not noted on EPPU. All patients with DVT (by either EPPU or CTV) were found to have PE on CTA. Sensitivity and specificity of EPPU when compared to CTV in the diagnosis of DVT was 86% (95% CI, 42%-99%) and 100% (95% CI, 91%-100%), respectively. Conclusions: Emergency physician-performed ultrasound produces results consistent with CTV in the diagnosis of femoropopliteal DVT. More proximal clots are not evaluated with EPPU and thus may result in a false negative.

AB - Background: Venous thromboembolic disease is a major cause of mortality and morbidity. Objectives: The aim of this study is to compare emergency physician-performed ultrasound (EPPU) of the lower extremities with CT venography (CTV) in emergency department (ED) patients undergoing workup for pulmonary embolism (PE). Methods: This was a prospective study performed at a busy academic ED. Adult patients (>18) undergoing workup for PE were eligible for the study; enrollment was based on a convenience sample, during hours worked by the investigators. Study patients underwent EPPU of the lower extremities followed by CT angiogram (CTA) of the chest and CTV of the lower extremities. Sensitivity and specificity of the ultrasound examination were calculated using CTV as the gold standard. Results: A total of 61 patients were enrolled. Of 61 patients, 50 (82%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 72%-91%) had negative workups; 11 (18%; 95% CI, 8%-27%) were noted to have PE on CTA; 6 (10%; 95% CI, 2%-17%) were noted to have lower extremity deep venous thrombosis (DVT) on both EPPU and CTV evaluation; whereas 1 patient was found to have an external iliac DVT on CTV, which was not noted on EPPU. All patients with DVT (by either EPPU or CTV) were found to have PE on CTA. Sensitivity and specificity of EPPU when compared to CTV in the diagnosis of DVT was 86% (95% CI, 42%-99%) and 100% (95% CI, 91%-100%), respectively. Conclusions: Emergency physician-performed ultrasound produces results consistent with CTV in the diagnosis of femoropopliteal DVT. More proximal clots are not evaluated with EPPU and thus may result in a false negative.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77649196903&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77649196903&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ajem.2009.01.009

DO - 10.1016/j.ajem.2009.01.009

M3 - Article

C2 - 20223396

AN - SCOPUS:77649196903

VL - 28

SP - 354

EP - 358

JO - American Journal of Emergency Medicine

JF - American Journal of Emergency Medicine

SN - 0735-6757

IS - 3

ER -