Prospective validation of the brain injury guidelines: Managing traumatic brain injury without neurosurgical consultation

Bellal Joseph, Hassan Aziz, Viraj Pandit, Narong Kulvatunyou, Moutamn Sadoun, Andrew Tang, Terence OKeeffe, Lynn Gries, Donald J. Green, Randall S. Friese, Michael G. Lemole, Peter Rhee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: To optimize neurosurgical resources, guidelines were developed at our institution, allowing the acute care surgeons to independently manage traumatic intracranial hemorrhage less than or equal to 4 mm. The aim of our study was to evaluate our established Brain Injury Guidelines (BIG 1 category) for managing patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) without neurosurgical consultation.

Methods: We formulated the BIG based on a 4-year retrospective chart reviewof all TBI patients presenting at our Level 1 trauma center. We then prospectively implemented our BIG 1 category to identify TBI patients that were to be managed without neurosurgical consultation (No-NC). Propensity scoring matched patients with No-NC to a similar cohort of patients managed with NC before the implementation of our BIG in a 1:1 ratio for demographics, severity of injury, and type and size of intracranial hemorrhage. Primary outcome measure was need for neurosurgical intervention and 30-day readmission rates.

Results: A total of 254 TBI patients (127 of NC and 127 of No-NC patients) were included in the analysis. The mean (SD) age was 40.8 (22.7) years, 63.4% (n = 161) were male, median Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score was 15 (range, 13Y15), and median head Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) score was 2 (range, 2Y3). There was no neurosurgical intervention or 30-day readmission in both the groups. In the No-NC group, 3.9% of the patients had postdischarge emergency department visits compared with 4.7% of the NC group (p = 0.5). All patients were discharged home from the emergency department.

Conclusion: We validated our BIG and demonstrated that acute care surgeons can effectively care for minimally injured TBI patients with good outcomes.Anational multi-institutional prospective evaluation iswarranted.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)984-988
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery
Volume77
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 11 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Brain Injuries
Referral and Consultation
Guidelines
Hospital Emergency Service
Traumatic Intracranial Hemorrhage
Abbreviated Injury Scale
Traumatic Brain Injury
Glasgow Coma Scale
Intracranial Hemorrhages
Trauma Centers
Craniocerebral Trauma
Demography
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Wounds and Injuries

Keywords

  • Acute care surgeons
  • Brain injury guidelines
  • Management of traumatic brain injury
  • Neurosurgical consultation
  • Neurosurgical intervention

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Cite this

Prospective validation of the brain injury guidelines : Managing traumatic brain injury without neurosurgical consultation. / Joseph, Bellal; Aziz, Hassan; Pandit, Viraj; Kulvatunyou, Narong; Sadoun, Moutamn; Tang, Andrew; OKeeffe, Terence; Gries, Lynn; Green, Donald J.; Friese, Randall S.; Lemole, Michael G.; Rhee, Peter.

In: Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, Vol. 77, No. 6, 11.12.2014, p. 984-988.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Joseph, B, Aziz, H, Pandit, V, Kulvatunyou, N, Sadoun, M, Tang, A, OKeeffe, T, Gries, L, Green, DJ, Friese, RS, Lemole, MG & Rhee, P 2014, 'Prospective validation of the brain injury guidelines: Managing traumatic brain injury without neurosurgical consultation', Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, vol. 77, no. 6, pp. 984-988. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000000428
Joseph, Bellal ; Aziz, Hassan ; Pandit, Viraj ; Kulvatunyou, Narong ; Sadoun, Moutamn ; Tang, Andrew ; OKeeffe, Terence ; Gries, Lynn ; Green, Donald J. ; Friese, Randall S. ; Lemole, Michael G. ; Rhee, Peter. / Prospective validation of the brain injury guidelines : Managing traumatic brain injury without neurosurgical consultation. In: Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery. 2014 ; Vol. 77, No. 6. pp. 984-988.
@article{ce7987b643b44296990b088ff22dbdcf,
title = "Prospective validation of the brain injury guidelines: Managing traumatic brain injury without neurosurgical consultation",
abstract = "Background: To optimize neurosurgical resources, guidelines were developed at our institution, allowing the acute care surgeons to independently manage traumatic intracranial hemorrhage less than or equal to 4 mm. The aim of our study was to evaluate our established Brain Injury Guidelines (BIG 1 category) for managing patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) without neurosurgical consultation.Methods: We formulated the BIG based on a 4-year retrospective chart reviewof all TBI patients presenting at our Level 1 trauma center. We then prospectively implemented our BIG 1 category to identify TBI patients that were to be managed without neurosurgical consultation (No-NC). Propensity scoring matched patients with No-NC to a similar cohort of patients managed with NC before the implementation of our BIG in a 1:1 ratio for demographics, severity of injury, and type and size of intracranial hemorrhage. Primary outcome measure was need for neurosurgical intervention and 30-day readmission rates.Results: A total of 254 TBI patients (127 of NC and 127 of No-NC patients) were included in the analysis. The mean (SD) age was 40.8 (22.7) years, 63.4{\%} (n = 161) were male, median Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score was 15 (range, 13Y15), and median head Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) score was 2 (range, 2Y3). There was no neurosurgical intervention or 30-day readmission in both the groups. In the No-NC group, 3.9{\%} of the patients had postdischarge emergency department visits compared with 4.7{\%} of the NC group (p = 0.5). All patients were discharged home from the emergency department.Conclusion: We validated our BIG and demonstrated that acute care surgeons can effectively care for minimally injured TBI patients with good outcomes.Anational multi-institutional prospective evaluation iswarranted.",
keywords = "Acute care surgeons, Brain injury guidelines, Management of traumatic brain injury, Neurosurgical consultation, Neurosurgical intervention",
author = "Bellal Joseph and Hassan Aziz and Viraj Pandit and Narong Kulvatunyou and Moutamn Sadoun and Andrew Tang and Terence OKeeffe and Lynn Gries and Green, {Donald J.} and Friese, {Randall S.} and Lemole, {Michael G.} and Peter Rhee",
year = "2014",
month = "12",
day = "11",
doi = "10.1097/TA.0000000000000428",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "77",
pages = "984--988",
journal = "Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery",
issn = "2163-0755",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Prospective validation of the brain injury guidelines

T2 - Managing traumatic brain injury without neurosurgical consultation

AU - Joseph, Bellal

AU - Aziz, Hassan

AU - Pandit, Viraj

AU - Kulvatunyou, Narong

AU - Sadoun, Moutamn

AU - Tang, Andrew

AU - OKeeffe, Terence

AU - Gries, Lynn

AU - Green, Donald J.

AU - Friese, Randall S.

AU - Lemole, Michael G.

AU - Rhee, Peter

PY - 2014/12/11

Y1 - 2014/12/11

N2 - Background: To optimize neurosurgical resources, guidelines were developed at our institution, allowing the acute care surgeons to independently manage traumatic intracranial hemorrhage less than or equal to 4 mm. The aim of our study was to evaluate our established Brain Injury Guidelines (BIG 1 category) for managing patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) without neurosurgical consultation.Methods: We formulated the BIG based on a 4-year retrospective chart reviewof all TBI patients presenting at our Level 1 trauma center. We then prospectively implemented our BIG 1 category to identify TBI patients that were to be managed without neurosurgical consultation (No-NC). Propensity scoring matched patients with No-NC to a similar cohort of patients managed with NC before the implementation of our BIG in a 1:1 ratio for demographics, severity of injury, and type and size of intracranial hemorrhage. Primary outcome measure was need for neurosurgical intervention and 30-day readmission rates.Results: A total of 254 TBI patients (127 of NC and 127 of No-NC patients) were included in the analysis. The mean (SD) age was 40.8 (22.7) years, 63.4% (n = 161) were male, median Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score was 15 (range, 13Y15), and median head Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) score was 2 (range, 2Y3). There was no neurosurgical intervention or 30-day readmission in both the groups. In the No-NC group, 3.9% of the patients had postdischarge emergency department visits compared with 4.7% of the NC group (p = 0.5). All patients were discharged home from the emergency department.Conclusion: We validated our BIG and demonstrated that acute care surgeons can effectively care for minimally injured TBI patients with good outcomes.Anational multi-institutional prospective evaluation iswarranted.

AB - Background: To optimize neurosurgical resources, guidelines were developed at our institution, allowing the acute care surgeons to independently manage traumatic intracranial hemorrhage less than or equal to 4 mm. The aim of our study was to evaluate our established Brain Injury Guidelines (BIG 1 category) for managing patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) without neurosurgical consultation.Methods: We formulated the BIG based on a 4-year retrospective chart reviewof all TBI patients presenting at our Level 1 trauma center. We then prospectively implemented our BIG 1 category to identify TBI patients that were to be managed without neurosurgical consultation (No-NC). Propensity scoring matched patients with No-NC to a similar cohort of patients managed with NC before the implementation of our BIG in a 1:1 ratio for demographics, severity of injury, and type and size of intracranial hemorrhage. Primary outcome measure was need for neurosurgical intervention and 30-day readmission rates.Results: A total of 254 TBI patients (127 of NC and 127 of No-NC patients) were included in the analysis. The mean (SD) age was 40.8 (22.7) years, 63.4% (n = 161) were male, median Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score was 15 (range, 13Y15), and median head Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) score was 2 (range, 2Y3). There was no neurosurgical intervention or 30-day readmission in both the groups. In the No-NC group, 3.9% of the patients had postdischarge emergency department visits compared with 4.7% of the NC group (p = 0.5). All patients were discharged home from the emergency department.Conclusion: We validated our BIG and demonstrated that acute care surgeons can effectively care for minimally injured TBI patients with good outcomes.Anational multi-institutional prospective evaluation iswarranted.

KW - Acute care surgeons

KW - Brain injury guidelines

KW - Management of traumatic brain injury

KW - Neurosurgical consultation

KW - Neurosurgical intervention

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84917690514&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84917690514&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/TA.0000000000000428

DO - 10.1097/TA.0000000000000428

M3 - Article

C2 - 25423541

AN - SCOPUS:84917690514

VL - 77

SP - 984

EP - 988

JO - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery

JF - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery

SN - 2163-0755

IS - 6

ER -