Protecting America's Secrets while Maintaining Academic Freedom

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, and the subsequent anthrax mail attacks, have had a profound impact on Americans' personal and professional lives and have sparked an active debate regarding the delicate balance between the need for national security and the pursuit of academic freedom. Although academic freedom can be defined in many ways, there are four primary tenets of freedom in an academic environment: freedom to research, freedom to publish, freedom to teach, and freedom to speak. Each of these tenets has come under attack in the wake of September 11, 2001. In this report the author further defines academic freedom and reflects upon recent events that have had a real or perceived impact on this freedom, including (1) attempts to categorize and restrict some research as "sensitive," (2) implementation of export control laws and select agent regulations, (3) limitations on the publication of research findings, (4) prohibition of certain foreign nationals from collaborating with U.S. researchers and receiving education and training in U.S. colleges and universities, and (5) restraint of faculty free speech. The author offers some suggestions as to how academia might achieve a proper balance between protecting our national security while promoting and maintaining academic freedom.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)333-342
Number of pages10
JournalAcademic Medicine
Volume79
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2004
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

September 11, 2001
national security
research freedom
regulation
Law
event
university
education

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Cite this

Protecting America's Secrets while Maintaining Academic Freedom. / Keel, Brooks A.

In: Academic Medicine, Vol. 79, No. 4, 01.01.2004, p. 333-342.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{2f1ca3b998904c0e8f15611f787062cd,
title = "Protecting America's Secrets while Maintaining Academic Freedom",
abstract = "The terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, and the subsequent anthrax mail attacks, have had a profound impact on Americans' personal and professional lives and have sparked an active debate regarding the delicate balance between the need for national security and the pursuit of academic freedom. Although academic freedom can be defined in many ways, there are four primary tenets of freedom in an academic environment: freedom to research, freedom to publish, freedom to teach, and freedom to speak. Each of these tenets has come under attack in the wake of September 11, 2001. In this report the author further defines academic freedom and reflects upon recent events that have had a real or perceived impact on this freedom, including (1) attempts to categorize and restrict some research as {"}sensitive,{"} (2) implementation of export control laws and select agent regulations, (3) limitations on the publication of research findings, (4) prohibition of certain foreign nationals from collaborating with U.S. researchers and receiving education and training in U.S. colleges and universities, and (5) restraint of faculty free speech. The author offers some suggestions as to how academia might achieve a proper balance between protecting our national security while promoting and maintaining academic freedom.",
author = "Keel, {Brooks A.}",
year = "2004",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/00001888-200404000-00010",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "79",
pages = "333--342",
journal = "Academic Medicine",
issn = "1040-2446",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Protecting America's Secrets while Maintaining Academic Freedom

AU - Keel, Brooks A.

PY - 2004/1/1

Y1 - 2004/1/1

N2 - The terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, and the subsequent anthrax mail attacks, have had a profound impact on Americans' personal and professional lives and have sparked an active debate regarding the delicate balance between the need for national security and the pursuit of academic freedom. Although academic freedom can be defined in many ways, there are four primary tenets of freedom in an academic environment: freedom to research, freedom to publish, freedom to teach, and freedom to speak. Each of these tenets has come under attack in the wake of September 11, 2001. In this report the author further defines academic freedom and reflects upon recent events that have had a real or perceived impact on this freedom, including (1) attempts to categorize and restrict some research as "sensitive," (2) implementation of export control laws and select agent regulations, (3) limitations on the publication of research findings, (4) prohibition of certain foreign nationals from collaborating with U.S. researchers and receiving education and training in U.S. colleges and universities, and (5) restraint of faculty free speech. The author offers some suggestions as to how academia might achieve a proper balance between protecting our national security while promoting and maintaining academic freedom.

AB - The terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, and the subsequent anthrax mail attacks, have had a profound impact on Americans' personal and professional lives and have sparked an active debate regarding the delicate balance between the need for national security and the pursuit of academic freedom. Although academic freedom can be defined in many ways, there are four primary tenets of freedom in an academic environment: freedom to research, freedom to publish, freedom to teach, and freedom to speak. Each of these tenets has come under attack in the wake of September 11, 2001. In this report the author further defines academic freedom and reflects upon recent events that have had a real or perceived impact on this freedom, including (1) attempts to categorize and restrict some research as "sensitive," (2) implementation of export control laws and select agent regulations, (3) limitations on the publication of research findings, (4) prohibition of certain foreign nationals from collaborating with U.S. researchers and receiving education and training in U.S. colleges and universities, and (5) restraint of faculty free speech. The author offers some suggestions as to how academia might achieve a proper balance between protecting our national security while promoting and maintaining academic freedom.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=1842427657&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=1842427657&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/00001888-200404000-00010

DO - 10.1097/00001888-200404000-00010

M3 - Review article

C2 - 15044166

AN - SCOPUS:1842427657

VL - 79

SP - 333

EP - 342

JO - Academic Medicine

JF - Academic Medicine

SN - 1040-2446

IS - 4

ER -