Psychological and physical stress induce differential effects on human colonic motility

Satish Sanku Chander Rao, Renae A. Hatfield, Jerry M. Suls, Mindi J. Chamberlain

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

97 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: Stress modulates gut function, but whether the type of stressor influences colonic motor activity is unclear. The motor patterns and regional variations are also poorly understood. Our aim was to determine the effects of psychological and physical stress on colonic motility. Methods: Ambulatory colonic manometry was performed by placing a six-sensor probe up to the midtransverse colon, without sedation, in 12 healthy subjects. Five hours later, a dichotomous listening test (psychological stress) was performed, which was preceded by listening to a narrative passage (control); recovery entailed listening to relaxing music (1 h each). Subsequently, intermittent hand immersion in cold (4°C) water (physical stress) was performed, preceded by hand immersion in warm (37°C) water ( 1/2 -h each). Colonic pressure activity and cardiovascular responses were measured throughout the study. Results: When compared with the control period, both stressors induced a greater number of pressure waves (p < 0.05), and the area under the curve (p < 0.01), but only physical stress increased (p < 0.05) pulse rate and blood pressure. There were no regional differences in colonic motility. During recovery, the motor activity returned to baseline after physical stress, but remained high after psychological stress. Psychological stress induced more (p < 0.05) propagated contractions, whereas physical stress induced more (p < 0.05) simultaneous contractions. Conclusions: Both stressors enhanced colonic motor activity, but psychological stress induced a prolonged response with propagated activity and without appreciable autonomic response. Thus, colonic motor responses may vary depending on the stressor.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)985-990
Number of pages6
JournalAmerican Journal of Gastroenterology
Volume93
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 1998
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Psychological Stress
Motor Activity
Immersion
Hand
Blood Pressure
Pressure
Manometry
Music
Dehydration
Area Under Curve
Healthy Volunteers
Colon
Heart Rate
Water

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Hepatology
  • Gastroenterology

Cite this

Psychological and physical stress induce differential effects on human colonic motility. / Rao, Satish Sanku Chander; Hatfield, Renae A.; Suls, Jerry M.; Chamberlain, Mindi J.

In: American Journal of Gastroenterology, Vol. 93, No. 6, 01.06.1998, p. 985-990.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Rao, Satish Sanku Chander ; Hatfield, Renae A. ; Suls, Jerry M. ; Chamberlain, Mindi J. / Psychological and physical stress induce differential effects on human colonic motility. In: American Journal of Gastroenterology. 1998 ; Vol. 93, No. 6. pp. 985-990.
@article{37c48051b7124fad9a3d1183262b7073,
title = "Psychological and physical stress induce differential effects on human colonic motility",
abstract = "Objective: Stress modulates gut function, but whether the type of stressor influences colonic motor activity is unclear. The motor patterns and regional variations are also poorly understood. Our aim was to determine the effects of psychological and physical stress on colonic motility. Methods: Ambulatory colonic manometry was performed by placing a six-sensor probe up to the midtransverse colon, without sedation, in 12 healthy subjects. Five hours later, a dichotomous listening test (psychological stress) was performed, which was preceded by listening to a narrative passage (control); recovery entailed listening to relaxing music (1 h each). Subsequently, intermittent hand immersion in cold (4°C) water (physical stress) was performed, preceded by hand immersion in warm (37°C) water ( 1/2 -h each). Colonic pressure activity and cardiovascular responses were measured throughout the study. Results: When compared with the control period, both stressors induced a greater number of pressure waves (p < 0.05), and the area under the curve (p < 0.01), but only physical stress increased (p < 0.05) pulse rate and blood pressure. There were no regional differences in colonic motility. During recovery, the motor activity returned to baseline after physical stress, but remained high after psychological stress. Psychological stress induced more (p < 0.05) propagated contractions, whereas physical stress induced more (p < 0.05) simultaneous contractions. Conclusions: Both stressors enhanced colonic motor activity, but psychological stress induced a prolonged response with propagated activity and without appreciable autonomic response. Thus, colonic motor responses may vary depending on the stressor.",
author = "Rao, {Satish Sanku Chander} and Hatfield, {Renae A.} and Suls, {Jerry M.} and Chamberlain, {Mindi J.}",
year = "1998",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1572-0241.1998.00293.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "93",
pages = "985--990",
journal = "American Journal of Gastroenterology",
issn = "0002-9270",
publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Psychological and physical stress induce differential effects on human colonic motility

AU - Rao, Satish Sanku Chander

AU - Hatfield, Renae A.

AU - Suls, Jerry M.

AU - Chamberlain, Mindi J.

PY - 1998/6/1

Y1 - 1998/6/1

N2 - Objective: Stress modulates gut function, but whether the type of stressor influences colonic motor activity is unclear. The motor patterns and regional variations are also poorly understood. Our aim was to determine the effects of psychological and physical stress on colonic motility. Methods: Ambulatory colonic manometry was performed by placing a six-sensor probe up to the midtransverse colon, without sedation, in 12 healthy subjects. Five hours later, a dichotomous listening test (psychological stress) was performed, which was preceded by listening to a narrative passage (control); recovery entailed listening to relaxing music (1 h each). Subsequently, intermittent hand immersion in cold (4°C) water (physical stress) was performed, preceded by hand immersion in warm (37°C) water ( 1/2 -h each). Colonic pressure activity and cardiovascular responses were measured throughout the study. Results: When compared with the control period, both stressors induced a greater number of pressure waves (p < 0.05), and the area under the curve (p < 0.01), but only physical stress increased (p < 0.05) pulse rate and blood pressure. There were no regional differences in colonic motility. During recovery, the motor activity returned to baseline after physical stress, but remained high after psychological stress. Psychological stress induced more (p < 0.05) propagated contractions, whereas physical stress induced more (p < 0.05) simultaneous contractions. Conclusions: Both stressors enhanced colonic motor activity, but psychological stress induced a prolonged response with propagated activity and without appreciable autonomic response. Thus, colonic motor responses may vary depending on the stressor.

AB - Objective: Stress modulates gut function, but whether the type of stressor influences colonic motor activity is unclear. The motor patterns and regional variations are also poorly understood. Our aim was to determine the effects of psychological and physical stress on colonic motility. Methods: Ambulatory colonic manometry was performed by placing a six-sensor probe up to the midtransverse colon, without sedation, in 12 healthy subjects. Five hours later, a dichotomous listening test (psychological stress) was performed, which was preceded by listening to a narrative passage (control); recovery entailed listening to relaxing music (1 h each). Subsequently, intermittent hand immersion in cold (4°C) water (physical stress) was performed, preceded by hand immersion in warm (37°C) water ( 1/2 -h each). Colonic pressure activity and cardiovascular responses were measured throughout the study. Results: When compared with the control period, both stressors induced a greater number of pressure waves (p < 0.05), and the area under the curve (p < 0.01), but only physical stress increased (p < 0.05) pulse rate and blood pressure. There were no regional differences in colonic motility. During recovery, the motor activity returned to baseline after physical stress, but remained high after psychological stress. Psychological stress induced more (p < 0.05) propagated contractions, whereas physical stress induced more (p < 0.05) simultaneous contractions. Conclusions: Both stressors enhanced colonic motor activity, but psychological stress induced a prolonged response with propagated activity and without appreciable autonomic response. Thus, colonic motor responses may vary depending on the stressor.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032105412&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032105412&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1572-0241.1998.00293.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1572-0241.1998.00293.x

M3 - Article

VL - 93

SP - 985

EP - 990

JO - American Journal of Gastroenterology

JF - American Journal of Gastroenterology

SN - 0002-9270

IS - 6

ER -