Psychometric Properties of Reverse-Scored Items on the CES-D in a Sample of Ethnically Diverse Older Adults

Mike Carlson, Rand Wilcox, Chih Ping Chou, Megan Chang, Frances Margaret Yang, Jeanine Blanchard, Abbey Marterella, Ann Kuo, Florence Clark

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

37 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Reverse-scored items on assessment scales increase cognitive processing demands and may therefore lead to measurement problems for older adult respondents. In this study, the objective was to examine possible psychometric inadequacies of reverse-scored items on the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) when used to assess ethnically diverse older adults. Using baseline data from a gerontologic clinical trial (n = 460), we tested the hypotheses that the reversed items on the CES-D (a) are less reliable than nonreversed items, (b) disproportionately lead to intraindividually atypical responses that are psychometrically problematic, and (c) evidence improved measurement properties when an imputation procedure based on the scale mean is used to replace atypical responses. In general, the results supported the hypotheses. Relative to nonreversed CES-D items, the 4 reversed items were less internally consistent, were associated with lower item-scale correlations, and were more often answered atypically at an intraindividual level. Further, the atypical responses were negatively correlated with responses to psychometrically sound nonreversed items that had similar content. The use of imputation to replace atypical responses enhanced the predictive validity of the set of reverse-scored items. Among older adult respondents, reverse-scored items are associated with measurement difficulties. It is recommended that appropriate correction procedures such as item readministration or statistical imputation be applied to reduce the difficulties.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)558-562
Number of pages5
JournalPsychological Assessment
Volume23
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2011

Fingerprint

Psychometrics
Epidemiologic Studies
Depression
Clinical Trials
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • CES-D
  • Depression
  • Older adults
  • Reversed item format

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Psychology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Carlson, M., Wilcox, R., Chou, C. P., Chang, M., Yang, F. M., Blanchard, J., ... Clark, F. (2011). Psychometric Properties of Reverse-Scored Items on the CES-D in a Sample of Ethnically Diverse Older Adults. Psychological Assessment, 23(2), 558-562. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022484

Psychometric Properties of Reverse-Scored Items on the CES-D in a Sample of Ethnically Diverse Older Adults. / Carlson, Mike; Wilcox, Rand; Chou, Chih Ping; Chang, Megan; Yang, Frances Margaret; Blanchard, Jeanine; Marterella, Abbey; Kuo, Ann; Clark, Florence.

In: Psychological Assessment, Vol. 23, No. 2, 01.06.2011, p. 558-562.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Carlson, M, Wilcox, R, Chou, CP, Chang, M, Yang, FM, Blanchard, J, Marterella, A, Kuo, A & Clark, F 2011, 'Psychometric Properties of Reverse-Scored Items on the CES-D in a Sample of Ethnically Diverse Older Adults', Psychological Assessment, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 558-562. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022484
Carlson, Mike ; Wilcox, Rand ; Chou, Chih Ping ; Chang, Megan ; Yang, Frances Margaret ; Blanchard, Jeanine ; Marterella, Abbey ; Kuo, Ann ; Clark, Florence. / Psychometric Properties of Reverse-Scored Items on the CES-D in a Sample of Ethnically Diverse Older Adults. In: Psychological Assessment. 2011 ; Vol. 23, No. 2. pp. 558-562.
@article{4c070a31b80f4ff0b5f1a93fda428f0d,
title = "Psychometric Properties of Reverse-Scored Items on the CES-D in a Sample of Ethnically Diverse Older Adults",
abstract = "Reverse-scored items on assessment scales increase cognitive processing demands and may therefore lead to measurement problems for older adult respondents. In this study, the objective was to examine possible psychometric inadequacies of reverse-scored items on the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) when used to assess ethnically diverse older adults. Using baseline data from a gerontologic clinical trial (n = 460), we tested the hypotheses that the reversed items on the CES-D (a) are less reliable than nonreversed items, (b) disproportionately lead to intraindividually atypical responses that are psychometrically problematic, and (c) evidence improved measurement properties when an imputation procedure based on the scale mean is used to replace atypical responses. In general, the results supported the hypotheses. Relative to nonreversed CES-D items, the 4 reversed items were less internally consistent, were associated with lower item-scale correlations, and were more often answered atypically at an intraindividual level. Further, the atypical responses were negatively correlated with responses to psychometrically sound nonreversed items that had similar content. The use of imputation to replace atypical responses enhanced the predictive validity of the set of reverse-scored items. Among older adult respondents, reverse-scored items are associated with measurement difficulties. It is recommended that appropriate correction procedures such as item readministration or statistical imputation be applied to reduce the difficulties.",
keywords = "CES-D, Depression, Older adults, Reversed item format",
author = "Mike Carlson and Rand Wilcox and Chou, {Chih Ping} and Megan Chang and Yang, {Frances Margaret} and Jeanine Blanchard and Abbey Marterella and Ann Kuo and Florence Clark",
year = "2011",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1037/a0022484",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "23",
pages = "558--562",
journal = "Psychological Assessment",
issn = "1040-3590",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Psychometric Properties of Reverse-Scored Items on the CES-D in a Sample of Ethnically Diverse Older Adults

AU - Carlson, Mike

AU - Wilcox, Rand

AU - Chou, Chih Ping

AU - Chang, Megan

AU - Yang, Frances Margaret

AU - Blanchard, Jeanine

AU - Marterella, Abbey

AU - Kuo, Ann

AU - Clark, Florence

PY - 2011/6/1

Y1 - 2011/6/1

N2 - Reverse-scored items on assessment scales increase cognitive processing demands and may therefore lead to measurement problems for older adult respondents. In this study, the objective was to examine possible psychometric inadequacies of reverse-scored items on the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) when used to assess ethnically diverse older adults. Using baseline data from a gerontologic clinical trial (n = 460), we tested the hypotheses that the reversed items on the CES-D (a) are less reliable than nonreversed items, (b) disproportionately lead to intraindividually atypical responses that are psychometrically problematic, and (c) evidence improved measurement properties when an imputation procedure based on the scale mean is used to replace atypical responses. In general, the results supported the hypotheses. Relative to nonreversed CES-D items, the 4 reversed items were less internally consistent, were associated with lower item-scale correlations, and were more often answered atypically at an intraindividual level. Further, the atypical responses were negatively correlated with responses to psychometrically sound nonreversed items that had similar content. The use of imputation to replace atypical responses enhanced the predictive validity of the set of reverse-scored items. Among older adult respondents, reverse-scored items are associated with measurement difficulties. It is recommended that appropriate correction procedures such as item readministration or statistical imputation be applied to reduce the difficulties.

AB - Reverse-scored items on assessment scales increase cognitive processing demands and may therefore lead to measurement problems for older adult respondents. In this study, the objective was to examine possible psychometric inadequacies of reverse-scored items on the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) when used to assess ethnically diverse older adults. Using baseline data from a gerontologic clinical trial (n = 460), we tested the hypotheses that the reversed items on the CES-D (a) are less reliable than nonreversed items, (b) disproportionately lead to intraindividually atypical responses that are psychometrically problematic, and (c) evidence improved measurement properties when an imputation procedure based on the scale mean is used to replace atypical responses. In general, the results supported the hypotheses. Relative to nonreversed CES-D items, the 4 reversed items were less internally consistent, were associated with lower item-scale correlations, and were more often answered atypically at an intraindividual level. Further, the atypical responses were negatively correlated with responses to psychometrically sound nonreversed items that had similar content. The use of imputation to replace atypical responses enhanced the predictive validity of the set of reverse-scored items. Among older adult respondents, reverse-scored items are associated with measurement difficulties. It is recommended that appropriate correction procedures such as item readministration or statistical imputation be applied to reduce the difficulties.

KW - CES-D

KW - Depression

KW - Older adults

KW - Reversed item format

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79959319239&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79959319239&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/a0022484

DO - 10.1037/a0022484

M3 - Article

C2 - 21319906

AN - SCOPUS:79959319239

VL - 23

SP - 558

EP - 562

JO - Psychological Assessment

JF - Psychological Assessment

SN - 1040-3590

IS - 2

ER -