Public opinion: A powerful predictor of U.S. defense spending? A comment

Jurgen Brauer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

A recent paper in Defence Economics suggests that “a single variable, the public opinion balance,. when accompanied by a control variable measuring the proportion of responses in the ‘residuum’ (no opinion or keep the status quo), permits an accurate prediction of subsequent changes in the rate of change of U.S. defense outlays from the mid-1960s through the 1980s” (Higgs and Kilduff, 1993, p. 227). In contrast, this comment provides evidence that since 1986 the Higgs-Kilduff model frequently mispredicts the direction of U.S. defense spending. In addition, the average prediction error, and its variance, since 1986 consistently exceeds the average prediction error, and its variance, for the years prior to 1986.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)247-253
Number of pages7
JournalDefence and Peace Economics
Volume5
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 1994
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

public opinion
evidence
economics
Defense spending
Public opinion
Predictors
Prediction error
Defence economics
Proportion
Prediction
Status quo
Control variable

Keywords

  • Public opinion
  • U.S. defense expenditures

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Public opinion : A powerful predictor of U.S. defense spending? A comment. / Brauer, Jurgen.

In: Defence and Peace Economics, Vol. 5, No. 3, 01.07.1994, p. 247-253.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ac51f9354e47413a9b0b0e41f0ec2668,
title = "Public opinion: A powerful predictor of U.S. defense spending? A comment",
abstract = "A recent paper in Defence Economics suggests that “a single variable, the public opinion balance,. when accompanied by a control variable measuring the proportion of responses in the ‘residuum’ (no opinion or keep the status quo), permits an accurate prediction of subsequent changes in the rate of change of U.S. defense outlays from the mid-1960s through the 1980s” (Higgs and Kilduff, 1993, p. 227). In contrast, this comment provides evidence that since 1986 the Higgs-Kilduff model frequently mispredicts the direction of U.S. defense spending. In addition, the average prediction error, and its variance, since 1986 consistently exceeds the average prediction error, and its variance, for the years prior to 1986.",
keywords = "Public opinion, U.S. defense expenditures",
author = "Jurgen Brauer",
year = "1994",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/10430719408404795",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "5",
pages = "247--253",
journal = "Defence and Peace Economics",
issn = "1024-2694",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Public opinion

T2 - A powerful predictor of U.S. defense spending? A comment

AU - Brauer, Jurgen

PY - 1994/7/1

Y1 - 1994/7/1

N2 - A recent paper in Defence Economics suggests that “a single variable, the public opinion balance,. when accompanied by a control variable measuring the proportion of responses in the ‘residuum’ (no opinion or keep the status quo), permits an accurate prediction of subsequent changes in the rate of change of U.S. defense outlays from the mid-1960s through the 1980s” (Higgs and Kilduff, 1993, p. 227). In contrast, this comment provides evidence that since 1986 the Higgs-Kilduff model frequently mispredicts the direction of U.S. defense spending. In addition, the average prediction error, and its variance, since 1986 consistently exceeds the average prediction error, and its variance, for the years prior to 1986.

AB - A recent paper in Defence Economics suggests that “a single variable, the public opinion balance,. when accompanied by a control variable measuring the proportion of responses in the ‘residuum’ (no opinion or keep the status quo), permits an accurate prediction of subsequent changes in the rate of change of U.S. defense outlays from the mid-1960s through the 1980s” (Higgs and Kilduff, 1993, p. 227). In contrast, this comment provides evidence that since 1986 the Higgs-Kilduff model frequently mispredicts the direction of U.S. defense spending. In addition, the average prediction error, and its variance, since 1986 consistently exceeds the average prediction error, and its variance, for the years prior to 1986.

KW - Public opinion

KW - U.S. defense expenditures

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84948230377&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84948230377&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10430719408404795

DO - 10.1080/10430719408404795

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84948230377

VL - 5

SP - 247

EP - 253

JO - Defence and Peace Economics

JF - Defence and Peace Economics

SN - 1024-2694

IS - 3

ER -