Qualitative assessment of telemedicine network and computer-based telecolposcopy

Daron G. Ferris, Mark S. Litaker, Jill A. Miller, Michael S. Macfee, Debra Crawley, Diane Watson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective. To qualitatively assess telemedicine network and computer-based telecolposcopy. Materials and methods. A site expert and local colposcopist examined women presenting consecutively for colposcopic examination at 1 of 2 rural clinics. Images from the exam were transmitted to distant experts at a telemedicine center by an existing telemedicine network and computer-based telecolposcopy system. Colposcopists rated both systems with respect to complications, ease and confidence of procedure, and system resolution and visualization. Results. Rates of technically defective examinations were similar for network (25.1%) and computer-based (22.5%) telecolposcopy (p = .46). The ease of telecolposcopic examinations and colposcopists' confidence in and comfort with telecolposcopy were practically equal for both systems. Mean perceived quality of care was greater for network (3.92) compared with computer-based (3.82) telecolposcopy (Wilcoxon signed rank test, p = .03; Likert scale, 1 = minimal, 5 = maximum). Image resolution was rated better for computer-based (3.36) compared with network (3.07, p < .0001) telecolposcopy. However, visualization was better for the latter system in comparison (3.43 vs 3.07, p < .0001). Conclusions. The quality of telecolposcopy was considered above average based on all parameters evaluated for each type of telecolposcopy. Although a few significant differences were detected, colposcopists perceived network and computer-based telecolposcopy to be very similar by subjective assessment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)145-149
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Lower Genital Tract Disease
Volume6
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2002

Fingerprint

Telemedicine
Quality of Health Care
Nonparametric Statistics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

Qualitative assessment of telemedicine network and computer-based telecolposcopy. / Ferris, Daron G.; Litaker, Mark S.; Miller, Jill A.; Macfee, Michael S.; Crawley, Debra; Watson, Diane.

In: Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease, Vol. 6, No. 3, 01.01.2002, p. 145-149.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ferris, Daron G. ; Litaker, Mark S. ; Miller, Jill A. ; Macfee, Michael S. ; Crawley, Debra ; Watson, Diane. / Qualitative assessment of telemedicine network and computer-based telecolposcopy. In: Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease. 2002 ; Vol. 6, No. 3. pp. 145-149.
@article{581a97ce2ddc43af97da4e615e3d3ff1,
title = "Qualitative assessment of telemedicine network and computer-based telecolposcopy",
abstract = "Objective. To qualitatively assess telemedicine network and computer-based telecolposcopy. Materials and methods. A site expert and local colposcopist examined women presenting consecutively for colposcopic examination at 1 of 2 rural clinics. Images from the exam were transmitted to distant experts at a telemedicine center by an existing telemedicine network and computer-based telecolposcopy system. Colposcopists rated both systems with respect to complications, ease and confidence of procedure, and system resolution and visualization. Results. Rates of technically defective examinations were similar for network (25.1{\%}) and computer-based (22.5{\%}) telecolposcopy (p = .46). The ease of telecolposcopic examinations and colposcopists' confidence in and comfort with telecolposcopy were practically equal for both systems. Mean perceived quality of care was greater for network (3.92) compared with computer-based (3.82) telecolposcopy (Wilcoxon signed rank test, p = .03; Likert scale, 1 = minimal, 5 = maximum). Image resolution was rated better for computer-based (3.36) compared with network (3.07, p < .0001) telecolposcopy. However, visualization was better for the latter system in comparison (3.43 vs 3.07, p < .0001). Conclusions. The quality of telecolposcopy was considered above average based on all parameters evaluated for each type of telecolposcopy. Although a few significant differences were detected, colposcopists perceived network and computer-based telecolposcopy to be very similar by subjective assessment.",
author = "Ferris, {Daron G.} and Litaker, {Mark S.} and Miller, {Jill A.} and Macfee, {Michael S.} and Debra Crawley and Diane Watson",
year = "2002",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/00128360-200207000-00001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "6",
pages = "145--149",
journal = "Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease",
issn = "1089-2591",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Qualitative assessment of telemedicine network and computer-based telecolposcopy

AU - Ferris, Daron G.

AU - Litaker, Mark S.

AU - Miller, Jill A.

AU - Macfee, Michael S.

AU - Crawley, Debra

AU - Watson, Diane

PY - 2002/1/1

Y1 - 2002/1/1

N2 - Objective. To qualitatively assess telemedicine network and computer-based telecolposcopy. Materials and methods. A site expert and local colposcopist examined women presenting consecutively for colposcopic examination at 1 of 2 rural clinics. Images from the exam were transmitted to distant experts at a telemedicine center by an existing telemedicine network and computer-based telecolposcopy system. Colposcopists rated both systems with respect to complications, ease and confidence of procedure, and system resolution and visualization. Results. Rates of technically defective examinations were similar for network (25.1%) and computer-based (22.5%) telecolposcopy (p = .46). The ease of telecolposcopic examinations and colposcopists' confidence in and comfort with telecolposcopy were practically equal for both systems. Mean perceived quality of care was greater for network (3.92) compared with computer-based (3.82) telecolposcopy (Wilcoxon signed rank test, p = .03; Likert scale, 1 = minimal, 5 = maximum). Image resolution was rated better for computer-based (3.36) compared with network (3.07, p < .0001) telecolposcopy. However, visualization was better for the latter system in comparison (3.43 vs 3.07, p < .0001). Conclusions. The quality of telecolposcopy was considered above average based on all parameters evaluated for each type of telecolposcopy. Although a few significant differences were detected, colposcopists perceived network and computer-based telecolposcopy to be very similar by subjective assessment.

AB - Objective. To qualitatively assess telemedicine network and computer-based telecolposcopy. Materials and methods. A site expert and local colposcopist examined women presenting consecutively for colposcopic examination at 1 of 2 rural clinics. Images from the exam were transmitted to distant experts at a telemedicine center by an existing telemedicine network and computer-based telecolposcopy system. Colposcopists rated both systems with respect to complications, ease and confidence of procedure, and system resolution and visualization. Results. Rates of technically defective examinations were similar for network (25.1%) and computer-based (22.5%) telecolposcopy (p = .46). The ease of telecolposcopic examinations and colposcopists' confidence in and comfort with telecolposcopy were practically equal for both systems. Mean perceived quality of care was greater for network (3.92) compared with computer-based (3.82) telecolposcopy (Wilcoxon signed rank test, p = .03; Likert scale, 1 = minimal, 5 = maximum). Image resolution was rated better for computer-based (3.36) compared with network (3.07, p < .0001) telecolposcopy. However, visualization was better for the latter system in comparison (3.43 vs 3.07, p < .0001). Conclusions. The quality of telecolposcopy was considered above average based on all parameters evaluated for each type of telecolposcopy. Although a few significant differences were detected, colposcopists perceived network and computer-based telecolposcopy to be very similar by subjective assessment.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036067069&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036067069&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/00128360-200207000-00001

DO - 10.1097/00128360-200207000-00001

M3 - Article

C2 - 17051013

AN - SCOPUS:0036067069

VL - 6

SP - 145

EP - 149

JO - Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease

JF - Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease

SN - 1089-2591

IS - 3

ER -