Quantification of incidental dose to potential clinical target volume (CTV) under different stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) techniques for non-small cell lung cancer - Tumor motion and using internal target volume (ITV) could improve dose distribution in CTV

JianYue Jin, Munther Ajlouni, Qing Chen, Feng Ming Kong, Samuel Ryu, Benjamin Movsas

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: Clinical target volume (CTV), although present, is usually not considered during stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for non-small cell lung cancer. This study aimed to quantify the incidental dose to the potential CTV under different SBRT techniques. Materials and methods: Ten patients with various tumor motions were included in the study. Gated-4DCT was performed for all patients. Three treatment plans were generated. Plan A was based on free breathing gross tumor volume (GTV) from a regular CT. Plan B was based on internal target volume (ITV) from gated 4DCT. Plan C was a perfect gated treatment at the exhale phase. The hypothetical CTV was represented by three CTV shells (5, 10, and 15 mm). Time-averaged dose for different respiratory phases was calculated for 18 representative points in each shell. Results: The minimum doses for plans A, B, and C were 84 ± 20%, 94 ± 3%, and 80 ± 17% of the isocenter dose to the 5 mm shell, 72 ± 27%, 64 ± 7%, and 20 ± 11% to the 10 mm shell, and 38 ± 27%, 27 ± 17%, and 6 ± 7% to the 15 mm shell, respectively. The caudal and cranial ends of each shell usually had lower dose compared to the other points on the shell. Plan B had the most uniform and reasonable doses to the CTV shells, and patients with large respiratory motion had significantly higher minimum dose than patients with less motion. Conclusion: The potential CTV may incidentally receive adequate and relatively homogeneous doses when ITV is used and the patients have large respiratory motion. However, it could be underdosed for gated treatment or for patients with little motion.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)267-276
Number of pages10
JournalRadiotherapy and Oncology
Volume85
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2007

Fingerprint

Hospital Distribution Systems
Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma
Radiotherapy
Levonorgestrel
Neoplasms
Tumor Burden
Respiration
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • Incidental dose
  • Microscopic extension
  • Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)
  • Respiratory motion
  • Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Urology

Cite this

@article{d11d96b06cc3430b8f825ee8eacdaf37,
title = "Quantification of incidental dose to potential clinical target volume (CTV) under different stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) techniques for non-small cell lung cancer - Tumor motion and using internal target volume (ITV) could improve dose distribution in CTV",
abstract = "Purpose: Clinical target volume (CTV), although present, is usually not considered during stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for non-small cell lung cancer. This study aimed to quantify the incidental dose to the potential CTV under different SBRT techniques. Materials and methods: Ten patients with various tumor motions were included in the study. Gated-4DCT was performed for all patients. Three treatment plans were generated. Plan A was based on free breathing gross tumor volume (GTV) from a regular CT. Plan B was based on internal target volume (ITV) from gated 4DCT. Plan C was a perfect gated treatment at the exhale phase. The hypothetical CTV was represented by three CTV shells (5, 10, and 15 mm). Time-averaged dose for different respiratory phases was calculated for 18 representative points in each shell. Results: The minimum doses for plans A, B, and C were 84 ± 20{\%}, 94 ± 3{\%}, and 80 ± 17{\%} of the isocenter dose to the 5 mm shell, 72 ± 27{\%}, 64 ± 7{\%}, and 20 ± 11{\%} to the 10 mm shell, and 38 ± 27{\%}, 27 ± 17{\%}, and 6 ± 7{\%} to the 15 mm shell, respectively. The caudal and cranial ends of each shell usually had lower dose compared to the other points on the shell. Plan B had the most uniform and reasonable doses to the CTV shells, and patients with large respiratory motion had significantly higher minimum dose than patients with less motion. Conclusion: The potential CTV may incidentally receive adequate and relatively homogeneous doses when ITV is used and the patients have large respiratory motion. However, it could be underdosed for gated treatment or for patients with little motion.",
keywords = "Incidental dose, Microscopic extension, Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), Respiratory motion, Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT)",
author = "JianYue Jin and Munther Ajlouni and Qing Chen and Kong, {Feng Ming} and Samuel Ryu and Benjamin Movsas",
year = "2007",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.radonc.2007.09.004",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "85",
pages = "267--276",
journal = "Radiotherapy and Oncology",
issn = "0167-8140",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Quantification of incidental dose to potential clinical target volume (CTV) under different stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) techniques for non-small cell lung cancer - Tumor motion and using internal target volume (ITV) could improve dose distribution in CTV

AU - Jin, JianYue

AU - Ajlouni, Munther

AU - Chen, Qing

AU - Kong, Feng Ming

AU - Ryu, Samuel

AU - Movsas, Benjamin

PY - 2007/11/1

Y1 - 2007/11/1

N2 - Purpose: Clinical target volume (CTV), although present, is usually not considered during stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for non-small cell lung cancer. This study aimed to quantify the incidental dose to the potential CTV under different SBRT techniques. Materials and methods: Ten patients with various tumor motions were included in the study. Gated-4DCT was performed for all patients. Three treatment plans were generated. Plan A was based on free breathing gross tumor volume (GTV) from a regular CT. Plan B was based on internal target volume (ITV) from gated 4DCT. Plan C was a perfect gated treatment at the exhale phase. The hypothetical CTV was represented by three CTV shells (5, 10, and 15 mm). Time-averaged dose for different respiratory phases was calculated for 18 representative points in each shell. Results: The minimum doses for plans A, B, and C were 84 ± 20%, 94 ± 3%, and 80 ± 17% of the isocenter dose to the 5 mm shell, 72 ± 27%, 64 ± 7%, and 20 ± 11% to the 10 mm shell, and 38 ± 27%, 27 ± 17%, and 6 ± 7% to the 15 mm shell, respectively. The caudal and cranial ends of each shell usually had lower dose compared to the other points on the shell. Plan B had the most uniform and reasonable doses to the CTV shells, and patients with large respiratory motion had significantly higher minimum dose than patients with less motion. Conclusion: The potential CTV may incidentally receive adequate and relatively homogeneous doses when ITV is used and the patients have large respiratory motion. However, it could be underdosed for gated treatment or for patients with little motion.

AB - Purpose: Clinical target volume (CTV), although present, is usually not considered during stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for non-small cell lung cancer. This study aimed to quantify the incidental dose to the potential CTV under different SBRT techniques. Materials and methods: Ten patients with various tumor motions were included in the study. Gated-4DCT was performed for all patients. Three treatment plans were generated. Plan A was based on free breathing gross tumor volume (GTV) from a regular CT. Plan B was based on internal target volume (ITV) from gated 4DCT. Plan C was a perfect gated treatment at the exhale phase. The hypothetical CTV was represented by three CTV shells (5, 10, and 15 mm). Time-averaged dose for different respiratory phases was calculated for 18 representative points in each shell. Results: The minimum doses for plans A, B, and C were 84 ± 20%, 94 ± 3%, and 80 ± 17% of the isocenter dose to the 5 mm shell, 72 ± 27%, 64 ± 7%, and 20 ± 11% to the 10 mm shell, and 38 ± 27%, 27 ± 17%, and 6 ± 7% to the 15 mm shell, respectively. The caudal and cranial ends of each shell usually had lower dose compared to the other points on the shell. Plan B had the most uniform and reasonable doses to the CTV shells, and patients with large respiratory motion had significantly higher minimum dose than patients with less motion. Conclusion: The potential CTV may incidentally receive adequate and relatively homogeneous doses when ITV is used and the patients have large respiratory motion. However, it could be underdosed for gated treatment or for patients with little motion.

KW - Incidental dose

KW - Microscopic extension

KW - Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

KW - Respiratory motion

KW - Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT)

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=36349030205&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=36349030205&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.radonc.2007.09.004

DO - 10.1016/j.radonc.2007.09.004

M3 - Article

C2 - 17905457

AN - SCOPUS:36349030205

VL - 85

SP - 267

EP - 276

JO - Radiotherapy and Oncology

JF - Radiotherapy and Oncology

SN - 0167-8140

IS - 2

ER -