Quantitative analysis of retrieved glenoid liners

Katelyn Childs, Lynn A Crosby, Tarun Goswami

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Revision of orthopedic surgeries is often expensive and involves higher risk from complications. Since most total joint replacement devices use a polyethylene bearing, which serves as a weak link, the assessment of damage to the liner due to in vivo exposure is very important. The failures often are due to excessive polyethylene wear. The glenoid liners are complex and hemispherical in shape and present challenges while assessing the damage. Therefore, the study on the analysis of glenoid liners retrieved from revision surgery may lend insight into common wear patterns and improve future product designs. The purpose of this pilot study is to further develop the methods of segmenting a liner into four quadrants to quantify the damage in the liner. Different damage modes are identified and statistically analyzed. Multiple analysts were recruited to conduct the damage assessments. In this paper, four analysts evaluated nine glenoid liners, retrieved from revision surgery, two of whom had an engineering background and two of whom had a non-engineering background. Associated human factor mechanisms are reported in this paper. The wear patterns were quantified using the Hood/Gunther, Wasielewski, Brandt, and Lombardi methods. The quantitative assessments made by several observers were analyzed. A new, composite damage parameter was developed and applied to assess damage. Inter-observer reliability was assessed using a paired t-test. Data reported by four analysts showed a high standard deviation; however, only two analysts performed the tests in a significantly similar way and they had engineering backgrounds.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number3
JournalLubricants
Volume4
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2016

Fingerprint

Surgery
Wear of materials
Polyethylene
Polyethylenes
Bearings (structural)
Chemical analysis
Orthopedics
Human engineering
Product design
Composite materials

Keywords

  • Glenoid liners
  • Human factors issues in damage assessment
  • Retrieved liner analysis
  • Total composite damage

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Mechanical Engineering
  • Surfaces, Coatings and Films

Cite this

Quantitative analysis of retrieved glenoid liners. / Childs, Katelyn; Crosby, Lynn A; Goswami, Tarun.

In: Lubricants, Vol. 4, No. 1, 3, 01.03.2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Childs, Katelyn ; Crosby, Lynn A ; Goswami, Tarun. / Quantitative analysis of retrieved glenoid liners. In: Lubricants. 2016 ; Vol. 4, No. 1.
@article{d77d28e9d5fc4b6b8df3a4eff765fc91,
title = "Quantitative analysis of retrieved glenoid liners",
abstract = "Revision of orthopedic surgeries is often expensive and involves higher risk from complications. Since most total joint replacement devices use a polyethylene bearing, which serves as a weak link, the assessment of damage to the liner due to in vivo exposure is very important. The failures often are due to excessive polyethylene wear. The glenoid liners are complex and hemispherical in shape and present challenges while assessing the damage. Therefore, the study on the analysis of glenoid liners retrieved from revision surgery may lend insight into common wear patterns and improve future product designs. The purpose of this pilot study is to further develop the methods of segmenting a liner into four quadrants to quantify the damage in the liner. Different damage modes are identified and statistically analyzed. Multiple analysts were recruited to conduct the damage assessments. In this paper, four analysts evaluated nine glenoid liners, retrieved from revision surgery, two of whom had an engineering background and two of whom had a non-engineering background. Associated human factor mechanisms are reported in this paper. The wear patterns were quantified using the Hood/Gunther, Wasielewski, Brandt, and Lombardi methods. The quantitative assessments made by several observers were analyzed. A new, composite damage parameter was developed and applied to assess damage. Inter-observer reliability was assessed using a paired t-test. Data reported by four analysts showed a high standard deviation; however, only two analysts performed the tests in a significantly similar way and they had engineering backgrounds.",
keywords = "Glenoid liners, Human factors issues in damage assessment, Retrieved liner analysis, Total composite damage",
author = "Katelyn Childs and Crosby, {Lynn A} and Tarun Goswami",
year = "2016",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3390/lubricants4010003",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "4",
journal = "Lubricants",
issn = "2075-4442",
publisher = "MDPI AG",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Quantitative analysis of retrieved glenoid liners

AU - Childs, Katelyn

AU - Crosby, Lynn A

AU - Goswami, Tarun

PY - 2016/3/1

Y1 - 2016/3/1

N2 - Revision of orthopedic surgeries is often expensive and involves higher risk from complications. Since most total joint replacement devices use a polyethylene bearing, which serves as a weak link, the assessment of damage to the liner due to in vivo exposure is very important. The failures often are due to excessive polyethylene wear. The glenoid liners are complex and hemispherical in shape and present challenges while assessing the damage. Therefore, the study on the analysis of glenoid liners retrieved from revision surgery may lend insight into common wear patterns and improve future product designs. The purpose of this pilot study is to further develop the methods of segmenting a liner into four quadrants to quantify the damage in the liner. Different damage modes are identified and statistically analyzed. Multiple analysts were recruited to conduct the damage assessments. In this paper, four analysts evaluated nine glenoid liners, retrieved from revision surgery, two of whom had an engineering background and two of whom had a non-engineering background. Associated human factor mechanisms are reported in this paper. The wear patterns were quantified using the Hood/Gunther, Wasielewski, Brandt, and Lombardi methods. The quantitative assessments made by several observers were analyzed. A new, composite damage parameter was developed and applied to assess damage. Inter-observer reliability was assessed using a paired t-test. Data reported by four analysts showed a high standard deviation; however, only two analysts performed the tests in a significantly similar way and they had engineering backgrounds.

AB - Revision of orthopedic surgeries is often expensive and involves higher risk from complications. Since most total joint replacement devices use a polyethylene bearing, which serves as a weak link, the assessment of damage to the liner due to in vivo exposure is very important. The failures often are due to excessive polyethylene wear. The glenoid liners are complex and hemispherical in shape and present challenges while assessing the damage. Therefore, the study on the analysis of glenoid liners retrieved from revision surgery may lend insight into common wear patterns and improve future product designs. The purpose of this pilot study is to further develop the methods of segmenting a liner into four quadrants to quantify the damage in the liner. Different damage modes are identified and statistically analyzed. Multiple analysts were recruited to conduct the damage assessments. In this paper, four analysts evaluated nine glenoid liners, retrieved from revision surgery, two of whom had an engineering background and two of whom had a non-engineering background. Associated human factor mechanisms are reported in this paper. The wear patterns were quantified using the Hood/Gunther, Wasielewski, Brandt, and Lombardi methods. The quantitative assessments made by several observers were analyzed. A new, composite damage parameter was developed and applied to assess damage. Inter-observer reliability was assessed using a paired t-test. Data reported by four analysts showed a high standard deviation; however, only two analysts performed the tests in a significantly similar way and they had engineering backgrounds.

KW - Glenoid liners

KW - Human factors issues in damage assessment

KW - Retrieved liner analysis

KW - Total composite damage

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85029471573&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85029471573&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3390/lubricants4010003

DO - 10.3390/lubricants4010003

M3 - Article

VL - 4

JO - Lubricants

JF - Lubricants

SN - 2075-4442

IS - 1

M1 - 3

ER -