Quantitative assessment of procedural competence

A prospective study of training in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography

Paul S. Jowell, John Baillie, M. Stanley Branch, John Paul Affronti, Cynthia L. Browning, Barbara Phillips Bute

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

211 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a technically demanding procedure that can cause substantial complications. Competence in performing ERCP and the learning curve for achieving competence are poorly understood. Objective: To evaluate the number of supervised ERCPs that physicians must do to achieve procedural competence. Competence was defined as a 0.8 probability of successfully completing specific technical components of ERCP and an overall grading of competence as judged by the attending physician. Design: Prospective study. Setting: University training program for gastroenterologists. Participants: 17 gastroenterology fellows at various stages of training. Measures: Experienced therapeutic endoscopists prospectively graded gastroenterology fellows during 1796 consecutive ERCPs. Fellows were graded on their overall level of competence for the procedure and on specific technical components of ERCP. Results: Grading data were available for 1450 ERCPs (81%). The number of ERCPs done before adequate skill was achieved was 160 for cholangiography, 140 for pancreatography, 160 for deep cannulation of the pancreatic duct, 120 for stone extraction, and 60 for stent insertion. Fellows achieved overall competence after completing 180 to 200 ERCPs. The predicted probability of overall competence was 0.8 after 137 ERCPs and 0.9 after 185 ERCPs. Conclusions: At least 180 ERCPs were required before these gastroenterology fellows could be considered competent in ERCP. This number is much greater than that previously recommended, and these findings have substantial implications for training guidelines and issues of competence and certification in ERCP. The methods used to define and evaluate competence in ERCP could also be used to assess competence in other medical procedures.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)983-989
Number of pages7
JournalAnnals of Internal Medicine
Volume125
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1996

Fingerprint

Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography
Mental Competency
Prospective Studies
Gastroenterology
Physicians
Learning Curve
Cholangiography
Pancreatic Ducts
Certification
Catheterization
Stents

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Internal Medicine

Cite this

Quantitative assessment of procedural competence : A prospective study of training in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. / Jowell, Paul S.; Baillie, John; Branch, M. Stanley; Affronti, John Paul; Browning, Cynthia L.; Bute, Barbara Phillips.

In: Annals of Internal Medicine, Vol. 125, No. 12, 01.01.1996, p. 983-989.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Jowell, Paul S. ; Baillie, John ; Branch, M. Stanley ; Affronti, John Paul ; Browning, Cynthia L. ; Bute, Barbara Phillips. / Quantitative assessment of procedural competence : A prospective study of training in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. In: Annals of Internal Medicine. 1996 ; Vol. 125, No. 12. pp. 983-989.
@article{ebb65d5e56a349bbbb8757565149d181,
title = "Quantitative assessment of procedural competence: A prospective study of training in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography",
abstract = "Background: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a technically demanding procedure that can cause substantial complications. Competence in performing ERCP and the learning curve for achieving competence are poorly understood. Objective: To evaluate the number of supervised ERCPs that physicians must do to achieve procedural competence. Competence was defined as a 0.8 probability of successfully completing specific technical components of ERCP and an overall grading of competence as judged by the attending physician. Design: Prospective study. Setting: University training program for gastroenterologists. Participants: 17 gastroenterology fellows at various stages of training. Measures: Experienced therapeutic endoscopists prospectively graded gastroenterology fellows during 1796 consecutive ERCPs. Fellows were graded on their overall level of competence for the procedure and on specific technical components of ERCP. Results: Grading data were available for 1450 ERCPs (81{\%}). The number of ERCPs done before adequate skill was achieved was 160 for cholangiography, 140 for pancreatography, 160 for deep cannulation of the pancreatic duct, 120 for stone extraction, and 60 for stent insertion. Fellows achieved overall competence after completing 180 to 200 ERCPs. The predicted probability of overall competence was 0.8 after 137 ERCPs and 0.9 after 185 ERCPs. Conclusions: At least 180 ERCPs were required before these gastroenterology fellows could be considered competent in ERCP. This number is much greater than that previously recommended, and these findings have substantial implications for training guidelines and issues of competence and certification in ERCP. The methods used to define and evaluate competence in ERCP could also be used to assess competence in other medical procedures.",
author = "Jowell, {Paul S.} and John Baillie and Branch, {M. Stanley} and Affronti, {John Paul} and Browning, {Cynthia L.} and Bute, {Barbara Phillips}",
year = "1996",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.7326/0003-4819-125-12-199612150-00009",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "125",
pages = "983--989",
journal = "Annals of Internal Medicine",
issn = "0003-4819",
publisher = "American College of Physicians",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Quantitative assessment of procedural competence

T2 - A prospective study of training in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography

AU - Jowell, Paul S.

AU - Baillie, John

AU - Branch, M. Stanley

AU - Affronti, John Paul

AU - Browning, Cynthia L.

AU - Bute, Barbara Phillips

PY - 1996/1/1

Y1 - 1996/1/1

N2 - Background: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a technically demanding procedure that can cause substantial complications. Competence in performing ERCP and the learning curve for achieving competence are poorly understood. Objective: To evaluate the number of supervised ERCPs that physicians must do to achieve procedural competence. Competence was defined as a 0.8 probability of successfully completing specific technical components of ERCP and an overall grading of competence as judged by the attending physician. Design: Prospective study. Setting: University training program for gastroenterologists. Participants: 17 gastroenterology fellows at various stages of training. Measures: Experienced therapeutic endoscopists prospectively graded gastroenterology fellows during 1796 consecutive ERCPs. Fellows were graded on their overall level of competence for the procedure and on specific technical components of ERCP. Results: Grading data were available for 1450 ERCPs (81%). The number of ERCPs done before adequate skill was achieved was 160 for cholangiography, 140 for pancreatography, 160 for deep cannulation of the pancreatic duct, 120 for stone extraction, and 60 for stent insertion. Fellows achieved overall competence after completing 180 to 200 ERCPs. The predicted probability of overall competence was 0.8 after 137 ERCPs and 0.9 after 185 ERCPs. Conclusions: At least 180 ERCPs were required before these gastroenterology fellows could be considered competent in ERCP. This number is much greater than that previously recommended, and these findings have substantial implications for training guidelines and issues of competence and certification in ERCP. The methods used to define and evaluate competence in ERCP could also be used to assess competence in other medical procedures.

AB - Background: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a technically demanding procedure that can cause substantial complications. Competence in performing ERCP and the learning curve for achieving competence are poorly understood. Objective: To evaluate the number of supervised ERCPs that physicians must do to achieve procedural competence. Competence was defined as a 0.8 probability of successfully completing specific technical components of ERCP and an overall grading of competence as judged by the attending physician. Design: Prospective study. Setting: University training program for gastroenterologists. Participants: 17 gastroenterology fellows at various stages of training. Measures: Experienced therapeutic endoscopists prospectively graded gastroenterology fellows during 1796 consecutive ERCPs. Fellows were graded on their overall level of competence for the procedure and on specific technical components of ERCP. Results: Grading data were available for 1450 ERCPs (81%). The number of ERCPs done before adequate skill was achieved was 160 for cholangiography, 140 for pancreatography, 160 for deep cannulation of the pancreatic duct, 120 for stone extraction, and 60 for stent insertion. Fellows achieved overall competence after completing 180 to 200 ERCPs. The predicted probability of overall competence was 0.8 after 137 ERCPs and 0.9 after 185 ERCPs. Conclusions: At least 180 ERCPs were required before these gastroenterology fellows could be considered competent in ERCP. This number is much greater than that previously recommended, and these findings have substantial implications for training guidelines and issues of competence and certification in ERCP. The methods used to define and evaluate competence in ERCP could also be used to assess competence in other medical procedures.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030465339&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030465339&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.7326/0003-4819-125-12-199612150-00009

DO - 10.7326/0003-4819-125-12-199612150-00009

M3 - Article

VL - 125

SP - 983

EP - 989

JO - Annals of Internal Medicine

JF - Annals of Internal Medicine

SN - 0003-4819

IS - 12

ER -