Racial/ethnic differences in responses to the everyday discrimination scale

A differential item functioning analysis

Tené T. Lewis, Frances Margaret Yang, Elizabeth A. Jacobs, George Fitchett

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

54 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The authors examined the impact of race/ethnicity on responses to the Everyday Discrimination Scale, one of the most widely used discrimination scales in epidemiologic and public health research. Participants were 3,295 middle-aged US women (African-American, Caucasian, Chinese, Hispanic, and Japanese) from the Study of Women's Health Across the Nation (SWAN) baseline examination (1996-1997). Multiple-indicator, multiple-cause models were used to examine differential item functioning (DIF) on the Everyday Discrimination Scale by race/ethnicity. After adjustment for age, education, and language of interview, meaningful DIF was observed for 3 (out of 10) items: "receiving poorer service in restaurants or stores," "being treated as if you are dishonest," and "being treated with less courtesy than other people" (all P's < 0.001). Consequently, the "profile" of everyday discrimination differed slightly for women of different racial/ethnic groups, with certain "public" experiences appearing to have more salience for African-American and Chinese women and "dishonesty" having more salience for racial/ethnic minority women overall. "Courtesy" appeared to have more salience for Hispanic women only in comparison with African-American women. Findings suggest that the Everyday Discrimination Scale could potentially be used across racial/ethnic groups as originally intended. However, researchers should use caution with items that demonstrated DIF.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)391-401
Number of pages11
JournalAmerican journal of epidemiology
Volume175
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2012

Fingerprint

African Americans
Hispanic Americans
Ethnic Groups
Restaurants
Women's Health
Language
Public Health
Research Personnel
Interviews
Education
Research

Keywords

  • African Americans
  • Asian Americans
  • European continental ancestry group
  • Hispanic Americans
  • bias (epidemiology)
  • prejudice
  • psychometrics
  • questionnaires

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Epidemiology

Cite this

Racial/ethnic differences in responses to the everyday discrimination scale : A differential item functioning analysis. / Lewis, Tené T.; Yang, Frances Margaret; Jacobs, Elizabeth A.; Fitchett, George.

In: American journal of epidemiology, Vol. 175, No. 5, 01.03.2012, p. 391-401.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lewis, Tené T. ; Yang, Frances Margaret ; Jacobs, Elizabeth A. ; Fitchett, George. / Racial/ethnic differences in responses to the everyday discrimination scale : A differential item functioning analysis. In: American journal of epidemiology. 2012 ; Vol. 175, No. 5. pp. 391-401.
@article{79882442671a4cfc823cbd07f541805d,
title = "Racial/ethnic differences in responses to the everyday discrimination scale: A differential item functioning analysis",
abstract = "The authors examined the impact of race/ethnicity on responses to the Everyday Discrimination Scale, one of the most widely used discrimination scales in epidemiologic and public health research. Participants were 3,295 middle-aged US women (African-American, Caucasian, Chinese, Hispanic, and Japanese) from the Study of Women's Health Across the Nation (SWAN) baseline examination (1996-1997). Multiple-indicator, multiple-cause models were used to examine differential item functioning (DIF) on the Everyday Discrimination Scale by race/ethnicity. After adjustment for age, education, and language of interview, meaningful DIF was observed for 3 (out of 10) items: {"}receiving poorer service in restaurants or stores,{"} {"}being treated as if you are dishonest,{"} and {"}being treated with less courtesy than other people{"} (all P's < 0.001). Consequently, the {"}profile{"} of everyday discrimination differed slightly for women of different racial/ethnic groups, with certain {"}public{"} experiences appearing to have more salience for African-American and Chinese women and {"}dishonesty{"} having more salience for racial/ethnic minority women overall. {"}Courtesy{"} appeared to have more salience for Hispanic women only in comparison with African-American women. Findings suggest that the Everyday Discrimination Scale could potentially be used across racial/ethnic groups as originally intended. However, researchers should use caution with items that demonstrated DIF.",
keywords = "African Americans, Asian Americans, European continental ancestry group, Hispanic Americans, bias (epidemiology), prejudice, psychometrics, questionnaires",
author = "Lewis, {Ten{\'e} T.} and Yang, {Frances Margaret} and Jacobs, {Elizabeth A.} and George Fitchett",
year = "2012",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/aje/kwr287",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "175",
pages = "391--401",
journal = "American Journal of Epidemiology",
issn = "0002-9262",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Racial/ethnic differences in responses to the everyday discrimination scale

T2 - A differential item functioning analysis

AU - Lewis, Tené T.

AU - Yang, Frances Margaret

AU - Jacobs, Elizabeth A.

AU - Fitchett, George

PY - 2012/3/1

Y1 - 2012/3/1

N2 - The authors examined the impact of race/ethnicity on responses to the Everyday Discrimination Scale, one of the most widely used discrimination scales in epidemiologic and public health research. Participants were 3,295 middle-aged US women (African-American, Caucasian, Chinese, Hispanic, and Japanese) from the Study of Women's Health Across the Nation (SWAN) baseline examination (1996-1997). Multiple-indicator, multiple-cause models were used to examine differential item functioning (DIF) on the Everyday Discrimination Scale by race/ethnicity. After adjustment for age, education, and language of interview, meaningful DIF was observed for 3 (out of 10) items: "receiving poorer service in restaurants or stores," "being treated as if you are dishonest," and "being treated with less courtesy than other people" (all P's < 0.001). Consequently, the "profile" of everyday discrimination differed slightly for women of different racial/ethnic groups, with certain "public" experiences appearing to have more salience for African-American and Chinese women and "dishonesty" having more salience for racial/ethnic minority women overall. "Courtesy" appeared to have more salience for Hispanic women only in comparison with African-American women. Findings suggest that the Everyday Discrimination Scale could potentially be used across racial/ethnic groups as originally intended. However, researchers should use caution with items that demonstrated DIF.

AB - The authors examined the impact of race/ethnicity on responses to the Everyday Discrimination Scale, one of the most widely used discrimination scales in epidemiologic and public health research. Participants were 3,295 middle-aged US women (African-American, Caucasian, Chinese, Hispanic, and Japanese) from the Study of Women's Health Across the Nation (SWAN) baseline examination (1996-1997). Multiple-indicator, multiple-cause models were used to examine differential item functioning (DIF) on the Everyday Discrimination Scale by race/ethnicity. After adjustment for age, education, and language of interview, meaningful DIF was observed for 3 (out of 10) items: "receiving poorer service in restaurants or stores," "being treated as if you are dishonest," and "being treated with less courtesy than other people" (all P's < 0.001). Consequently, the "profile" of everyday discrimination differed slightly for women of different racial/ethnic groups, with certain "public" experiences appearing to have more salience for African-American and Chinese women and "dishonesty" having more salience for racial/ethnic minority women overall. "Courtesy" appeared to have more salience for Hispanic women only in comparison with African-American women. Findings suggest that the Everyday Discrimination Scale could potentially be used across racial/ethnic groups as originally intended. However, researchers should use caution with items that demonstrated DIF.

KW - African Americans

KW - Asian Americans

KW - European continental ancestry group

KW - Hispanic Americans

KW - bias (epidemiology)

KW - prejudice

KW - psychometrics

KW - questionnaires

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84857613112&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84857613112&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/aje/kwr287

DO - 10.1093/aje/kwr287

M3 - Article

VL - 175

SP - 391

EP - 401

JO - American Journal of Epidemiology

JF - American Journal of Epidemiology

SN - 0002-9262

IS - 5

ER -