Radiology benefit managers: Cost saving or cost shifting?

David W. Lee, James V Rawson, Sally W. Wade

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

26 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose Radiology benefit managers (RBMs) are widely used by private payers to manage the utilization of imaging services through prior authorization, and they have been proposed for use in the Medicare program. The authors created a framework for evaluating the impact of key parameters on the ability of RBMs to lower costs and used decision-analytic modeling to simulate the net impact of RBMs on health care costs under uncertainty from a societal perspective. Methods The authors' model of a "typical" RBM's prior authorization process used base-case values for each parameter (utilization rate and costs for MR, CT, and PET imaging; physician and staff time spent in complying with RBM requirements; approval and denial rates; and RBM fees to insurers) drawn from published data and the experience of a large, academic institution. Different values were tested in the sensitivity analysis to account for uncertainty in the parameter estimates. A hypothetical 100,000-member private health plan with an imaging utilization rate of 135 per 1,000 members per year was assumed. Results Under the authors' base-case scenario, in which RBMs have no net impact on costs, they estimated that 28% ($182,066/$640,263) of the projected RBM-related savings are shifted to providers. RBMs were cost saving in 45% of simulations, and 95% of simulations fell between a cost decrease of $397,880 and a cost increase of $341,991. The probability of an initial approval by the RBM, the RBM's fee, and the imaging utilization rate and associated charges had the largest influence on the results. Conclusions The authors' models shows that RBMs shift significant costs to physicians and that their net impact on societal costs depends on parameters for which supporting data are incomplete.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)393-401
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of the American College of Radiology
Volume8
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2011

Fingerprint

Cost Allocation
Radiology
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Costs and Cost Analysis
Fees and Charges
Uncertainty
Physicians
Insurance Carriers
Decision Support Techniques
Medicare
Health Care Costs

Keywords

  • Utilization review
  • economic model
  • health policy
  • medical imaging

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Radiology benefit managers : Cost saving or cost shifting? / Lee, David W.; Rawson, James V; Wade, Sally W.

In: Journal of the American College of Radiology, Vol. 8, No. 6, 01.01.2011, p. 393-401.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lee, David W. ; Rawson, James V ; Wade, Sally W. / Radiology benefit managers : Cost saving or cost shifting?. In: Journal of the American College of Radiology. 2011 ; Vol. 8, No. 6. pp. 393-401.
@article{929f4bdac1034313b3894d0fa4f523d8,
title = "Radiology benefit managers: Cost saving or cost shifting?",
abstract = "Purpose Radiology benefit managers (RBMs) are widely used by private payers to manage the utilization of imaging services through prior authorization, and they have been proposed for use in the Medicare program. The authors created a framework for evaluating the impact of key parameters on the ability of RBMs to lower costs and used decision-analytic modeling to simulate the net impact of RBMs on health care costs under uncertainty from a societal perspective. Methods The authors' model of a {"}typical{"} RBM's prior authorization process used base-case values for each parameter (utilization rate and costs for MR, CT, and PET imaging; physician and staff time spent in complying with RBM requirements; approval and denial rates; and RBM fees to insurers) drawn from published data and the experience of a large, academic institution. Different values were tested in the sensitivity analysis to account for uncertainty in the parameter estimates. A hypothetical 100,000-member private health plan with an imaging utilization rate of 135 per 1,000 members per year was assumed. Results Under the authors' base-case scenario, in which RBMs have no net impact on costs, they estimated that 28{\%} ($182,066/$640,263) of the projected RBM-related savings are shifted to providers. RBMs were cost saving in 45{\%} of simulations, and 95{\%} of simulations fell between a cost decrease of $397,880 and a cost increase of $341,991. The probability of an initial approval by the RBM, the RBM's fee, and the imaging utilization rate and associated charges had the largest influence on the results. Conclusions The authors' models shows that RBMs shift significant costs to physicians and that their net impact on societal costs depends on parameters for which supporting data are incomplete.",
keywords = "Utilization review, economic model, health policy, medical imaging",
author = "Lee, {David W.} and Rawson, {James V} and Wade, {Sally W.}",
year = "2011",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jacr.2010.11.016",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "8",
pages = "393--401",
journal = "Journal of the American College of Radiology",
issn = "1558-349X",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Radiology benefit managers

T2 - Cost saving or cost shifting?

AU - Lee, David W.

AU - Rawson, James V

AU - Wade, Sally W.

PY - 2011/1/1

Y1 - 2011/1/1

N2 - Purpose Radiology benefit managers (RBMs) are widely used by private payers to manage the utilization of imaging services through prior authorization, and they have been proposed for use in the Medicare program. The authors created a framework for evaluating the impact of key parameters on the ability of RBMs to lower costs and used decision-analytic modeling to simulate the net impact of RBMs on health care costs under uncertainty from a societal perspective. Methods The authors' model of a "typical" RBM's prior authorization process used base-case values for each parameter (utilization rate and costs for MR, CT, and PET imaging; physician and staff time spent in complying with RBM requirements; approval and denial rates; and RBM fees to insurers) drawn from published data and the experience of a large, academic institution. Different values were tested in the sensitivity analysis to account for uncertainty in the parameter estimates. A hypothetical 100,000-member private health plan with an imaging utilization rate of 135 per 1,000 members per year was assumed. Results Under the authors' base-case scenario, in which RBMs have no net impact on costs, they estimated that 28% ($182,066/$640,263) of the projected RBM-related savings are shifted to providers. RBMs were cost saving in 45% of simulations, and 95% of simulations fell between a cost decrease of $397,880 and a cost increase of $341,991. The probability of an initial approval by the RBM, the RBM's fee, and the imaging utilization rate and associated charges had the largest influence on the results. Conclusions The authors' models shows that RBMs shift significant costs to physicians and that their net impact on societal costs depends on parameters for which supporting data are incomplete.

AB - Purpose Radiology benefit managers (RBMs) are widely used by private payers to manage the utilization of imaging services through prior authorization, and they have been proposed for use in the Medicare program. The authors created a framework for evaluating the impact of key parameters on the ability of RBMs to lower costs and used decision-analytic modeling to simulate the net impact of RBMs on health care costs under uncertainty from a societal perspective. Methods The authors' model of a "typical" RBM's prior authorization process used base-case values for each parameter (utilization rate and costs for MR, CT, and PET imaging; physician and staff time spent in complying with RBM requirements; approval and denial rates; and RBM fees to insurers) drawn from published data and the experience of a large, academic institution. Different values were tested in the sensitivity analysis to account for uncertainty in the parameter estimates. A hypothetical 100,000-member private health plan with an imaging utilization rate of 135 per 1,000 members per year was assumed. Results Under the authors' base-case scenario, in which RBMs have no net impact on costs, they estimated that 28% ($182,066/$640,263) of the projected RBM-related savings are shifted to providers. RBMs were cost saving in 45% of simulations, and 95% of simulations fell between a cost decrease of $397,880 and a cost increase of $341,991. The probability of an initial approval by the RBM, the RBM's fee, and the imaging utilization rate and associated charges had the largest influence on the results. Conclusions The authors' models shows that RBMs shift significant costs to physicians and that their net impact on societal costs depends on parameters for which supporting data are incomplete.

KW - Utilization review

KW - economic model

KW - health policy

KW - medical imaging

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84928096036&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84928096036&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jacr.2010.11.016

DO - 10.1016/j.jacr.2010.11.016

M3 - Article

C2 - 21636053

AN - SCOPUS:84928096036

VL - 8

SP - 393

EP - 401

JO - Journal of the American College of Radiology

JF - Journal of the American College of Radiology

SN - 1558-349X

IS - 6

ER -