Rate of detection of unsuspected pregnancies after implementation of mandatory point-of-care urine pregnancy testing prior to hysterosalpingography

Keith Herr, Courtney Coursey Moreno, Corinne Fantz, Pardeep Mittal, William C. Small, Fred Murphy, Kimberly E. Applegate

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to determine the rate of detection of unsuspected pregnancies after the implementation of mandatory point-of-care urine pregnancy testing before hysterosalpingography (HSG). Methods: At the authors' institution, HSGs are scheduled to occur during days 8 to 12 of the menstrual cycle. Upon arrival in the radiology department, all women undergo point-of-care urine pregnancy testing before HSG (at a cost of $1.25 per test). Urine pregnancy test results were retrospectively reviewed. Results: Four hundred ten women (mean age, 25.9 years; range, 22-50 years) underwent point-of-care urine pregnancy testing before HSG between October 2010 and July 2012. Study indications were infertility evaluation (90.7% [372 of 410]) and tubal patency assessment after placement of tubal occlusive devices (9.3% [38 of 410]). Two positive urine pregnancy test results (0.5%) were recorded. One positive result was deemed a false-positive because the patient had received an intramuscular injection of β-human chorionic gonadotropin before the scheduled HSG, and follow-up laboratory testing showed declining β-human chorionic gonadotropin levels. The second positive result was a true-positive, and the patient was determined to be 4.5 weeks pregnant on the date of the scheduled HSG. Conclusions: One of 410 women presenting for HSG was found to have an unsuspected early pregnancy, which was detected with a point-of-care urine pregnancy test. Consideration should be given to routine pregnancy testing of women before HSG because scheduling on the basis of menstrual cycle dates can be unreliable.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)533-537
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of the American College of Radiology
Volume10
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2013

Fingerprint

Point-of-Care Systems
Hysterosalpingography
Urine
Pregnancy
Pregnancy Tests
Chorionic Gonadotropin
Menstrual Cycle
Intramuscular Injections
Radiology
Infertility
Costs and Cost Analysis
Equipment and Supplies

Keywords

  • Hysterosalpingography
  • infertility
  • pregnancy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Rate of detection of unsuspected pregnancies after implementation of mandatory point-of-care urine pregnancy testing prior to hysterosalpingography. / Herr, Keith; Moreno, Courtney Coursey; Fantz, Corinne; Mittal, Pardeep; Small, William C.; Murphy, Fred; Applegate, Kimberly E.

In: Journal of the American College of Radiology, Vol. 10, No. 7, 01.01.2013, p. 533-537.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Herr, Keith ; Moreno, Courtney Coursey ; Fantz, Corinne ; Mittal, Pardeep ; Small, William C. ; Murphy, Fred ; Applegate, Kimberly E. / Rate of detection of unsuspected pregnancies after implementation of mandatory point-of-care urine pregnancy testing prior to hysterosalpingography. In: Journal of the American College of Radiology. 2013 ; Vol. 10, No. 7. pp. 533-537.
@article{8f4c4283e66845cfaa2b14d5eefe59c0,
title = "Rate of detection of unsuspected pregnancies after implementation of mandatory point-of-care urine pregnancy testing prior to hysterosalpingography",
abstract = "Purpose: The aim of this study was to determine the rate of detection of unsuspected pregnancies after the implementation of mandatory point-of-care urine pregnancy testing before hysterosalpingography (HSG). Methods: At the authors' institution, HSGs are scheduled to occur during days 8 to 12 of the menstrual cycle. Upon arrival in the radiology department, all women undergo point-of-care urine pregnancy testing before HSG (at a cost of $1.25 per test). Urine pregnancy test results were retrospectively reviewed. Results: Four hundred ten women (mean age, 25.9 years; range, 22-50 years) underwent point-of-care urine pregnancy testing before HSG between October 2010 and July 2012. Study indications were infertility evaluation (90.7{\%} [372 of 410]) and tubal patency assessment after placement of tubal occlusive devices (9.3{\%} [38 of 410]). Two positive urine pregnancy test results (0.5{\%}) were recorded. One positive result was deemed a false-positive because the patient had received an intramuscular injection of β-human chorionic gonadotropin before the scheduled HSG, and follow-up laboratory testing showed declining β-human chorionic gonadotropin levels. The second positive result was a true-positive, and the patient was determined to be 4.5 weeks pregnant on the date of the scheduled HSG. Conclusions: One of 410 women presenting for HSG was found to have an unsuspected early pregnancy, which was detected with a point-of-care urine pregnancy test. Consideration should be given to routine pregnancy testing of women before HSG because scheduling on the basis of menstrual cycle dates can be unreliable.",
keywords = "Hysterosalpingography, infertility, pregnancy",
author = "Keith Herr and Moreno, {Courtney Coursey} and Corinne Fantz and Pardeep Mittal and Small, {William C.} and Fred Murphy and Applegate, {Kimberly E.}",
year = "2013",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jacr.2013.01.011",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "10",
pages = "533--537",
journal = "Journal of the American College of Radiology",
issn = "1558-349X",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Rate of detection of unsuspected pregnancies after implementation of mandatory point-of-care urine pregnancy testing prior to hysterosalpingography

AU - Herr, Keith

AU - Moreno, Courtney Coursey

AU - Fantz, Corinne

AU - Mittal, Pardeep

AU - Small, William C.

AU - Murphy, Fred

AU - Applegate, Kimberly E.

PY - 2013/1/1

Y1 - 2013/1/1

N2 - Purpose: The aim of this study was to determine the rate of detection of unsuspected pregnancies after the implementation of mandatory point-of-care urine pregnancy testing before hysterosalpingography (HSG). Methods: At the authors' institution, HSGs are scheduled to occur during days 8 to 12 of the menstrual cycle. Upon arrival in the radiology department, all women undergo point-of-care urine pregnancy testing before HSG (at a cost of $1.25 per test). Urine pregnancy test results were retrospectively reviewed. Results: Four hundred ten women (mean age, 25.9 years; range, 22-50 years) underwent point-of-care urine pregnancy testing before HSG between October 2010 and July 2012. Study indications were infertility evaluation (90.7% [372 of 410]) and tubal patency assessment after placement of tubal occlusive devices (9.3% [38 of 410]). Two positive urine pregnancy test results (0.5%) were recorded. One positive result was deemed a false-positive because the patient had received an intramuscular injection of β-human chorionic gonadotropin before the scheduled HSG, and follow-up laboratory testing showed declining β-human chorionic gonadotropin levels. The second positive result was a true-positive, and the patient was determined to be 4.5 weeks pregnant on the date of the scheduled HSG. Conclusions: One of 410 women presenting for HSG was found to have an unsuspected early pregnancy, which was detected with a point-of-care urine pregnancy test. Consideration should be given to routine pregnancy testing of women before HSG because scheduling on the basis of menstrual cycle dates can be unreliable.

AB - Purpose: The aim of this study was to determine the rate of detection of unsuspected pregnancies after the implementation of mandatory point-of-care urine pregnancy testing before hysterosalpingography (HSG). Methods: At the authors' institution, HSGs are scheduled to occur during days 8 to 12 of the menstrual cycle. Upon arrival in the radiology department, all women undergo point-of-care urine pregnancy testing before HSG (at a cost of $1.25 per test). Urine pregnancy test results were retrospectively reviewed. Results: Four hundred ten women (mean age, 25.9 years; range, 22-50 years) underwent point-of-care urine pregnancy testing before HSG between October 2010 and July 2012. Study indications were infertility evaluation (90.7% [372 of 410]) and tubal patency assessment after placement of tubal occlusive devices (9.3% [38 of 410]). Two positive urine pregnancy test results (0.5%) were recorded. One positive result was deemed a false-positive because the patient had received an intramuscular injection of β-human chorionic gonadotropin before the scheduled HSG, and follow-up laboratory testing showed declining β-human chorionic gonadotropin levels. The second positive result was a true-positive, and the patient was determined to be 4.5 weeks pregnant on the date of the scheduled HSG. Conclusions: One of 410 women presenting for HSG was found to have an unsuspected early pregnancy, which was detected with a point-of-care urine pregnancy test. Consideration should be given to routine pregnancy testing of women before HSG because scheduling on the basis of menstrual cycle dates can be unreliable.

KW - Hysterosalpingography

KW - infertility

KW - pregnancy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84928100026&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84928100026&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jacr.2013.01.011

DO - 10.1016/j.jacr.2013.01.011

M3 - Article

VL - 10

SP - 533

EP - 537

JO - Journal of the American College of Radiology

JF - Journal of the American College of Radiology

SN - 1558-349X

IS - 7

ER -