Rate of removal of root structure by the use of the Prophy-Jet device.

S. E. Galloway, David Henry Pashley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

37 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The effects of a constant blast from the Prophy-Jet directed at enamel, dentin, and cementum over 5-, 10-, 15-, 20-, 30-, 40-, 50- and 60-second periods were evaluated to determine what effects the spray had on tooth structure. There was no visible effect on enamel when the spray was directed at the surface for as long as 60 seconds. It was shown, however, that as little as 5 seconds of continuous spray caused a substantial loss of structure when the spray was directed at dentin and cementum. This structural loss was linearly related to the amount of time the area was subjected to the spray. Substitution of flour of pumice for the Prophy-Jet powder resulted in approximately the same rate of loss of root structure. The results suggest that the manufacturers should provide more explicit warnings regarding the abrasiveness of the device on exposed dentin and cementum areas.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)464-469
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Periodontology
Volume58
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1987

Fingerprint

Dental Cementum
Dentin
Dental Enamel
Equipment and Supplies
Flour
Powders
Tooth

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Periodontics

Cite this

Rate of removal of root structure by the use of the Prophy-Jet device. / Galloway, S. E.; Pashley, David Henry.

In: Journal of Periodontology, Vol. 58, No. 7, 01.01.1987, p. 464-469.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Galloway, S. E. ; Pashley, David Henry. / Rate of removal of root structure by the use of the Prophy-Jet device. In: Journal of Periodontology. 1987 ; Vol. 58, No. 7. pp. 464-469.
@article{eb8679ece9ed4de2b13323b39640fae2,
title = "Rate of removal of root structure by the use of the Prophy-Jet device.",
abstract = "The effects of a constant blast from the Prophy-Jet directed at enamel, dentin, and cementum over 5-, 10-, 15-, 20-, 30-, 40-, 50- and 60-second periods were evaluated to determine what effects the spray had on tooth structure. There was no visible effect on enamel when the spray was directed at the surface for as long as 60 seconds. It was shown, however, that as little as 5 seconds of continuous spray caused a substantial loss of structure when the spray was directed at dentin and cementum. This structural loss was linearly related to the amount of time the area was subjected to the spray. Substitution of flour of pumice for the Prophy-Jet powder resulted in approximately the same rate of loss of root structure. The results suggest that the manufacturers should provide more explicit warnings regarding the abrasiveness of the device on exposed dentin and cementum areas.",
author = "Galloway, {S. E.} and Pashley, {David Henry}",
year = "1987",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1902/jop.1987.58.7.464",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "58",
pages = "464--469",
journal = "Journal of Periodontology",
issn = "0022-3492",
publisher = "American Academy of Periodontology",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Rate of removal of root structure by the use of the Prophy-Jet device.

AU - Galloway, S. E.

AU - Pashley, David Henry

PY - 1987/1/1

Y1 - 1987/1/1

N2 - The effects of a constant blast from the Prophy-Jet directed at enamel, dentin, and cementum over 5-, 10-, 15-, 20-, 30-, 40-, 50- and 60-second periods were evaluated to determine what effects the spray had on tooth structure. There was no visible effect on enamel when the spray was directed at the surface for as long as 60 seconds. It was shown, however, that as little as 5 seconds of continuous spray caused a substantial loss of structure when the spray was directed at dentin and cementum. This structural loss was linearly related to the amount of time the area was subjected to the spray. Substitution of flour of pumice for the Prophy-Jet powder resulted in approximately the same rate of loss of root structure. The results suggest that the manufacturers should provide more explicit warnings regarding the abrasiveness of the device on exposed dentin and cementum areas.

AB - The effects of a constant blast from the Prophy-Jet directed at enamel, dentin, and cementum over 5-, 10-, 15-, 20-, 30-, 40-, 50- and 60-second periods were evaluated to determine what effects the spray had on tooth structure. There was no visible effect on enamel when the spray was directed at the surface for as long as 60 seconds. It was shown, however, that as little as 5 seconds of continuous spray caused a substantial loss of structure when the spray was directed at dentin and cementum. This structural loss was linearly related to the amount of time the area was subjected to the spray. Substitution of flour of pumice for the Prophy-Jet powder resulted in approximately the same rate of loss of root structure. The results suggest that the manufacturers should provide more explicit warnings regarding the abrasiveness of the device on exposed dentin and cementum areas.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0023376552&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0023376552&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1902/jop.1987.58.7.464

DO - 10.1902/jop.1987.58.7.464

M3 - Article

VL - 58

SP - 464

EP - 469

JO - Journal of Periodontology

JF - Journal of Periodontology

SN - 0022-3492

IS - 7

ER -