Re-evaluation of the role of image guidance in minimally invasive pituitary surgery: Benefits and outcomes

Samip N. Patel, A. Samy Youssef, Fernando L. Vale, Tapan A. Padhya

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the utility of performing endonasal transsphenoidal pituitary surgery with computer-based neuronavigation, and to examine the efficacy of computer-based neuronavigation compared to fluoroscopy. Patients: We conducted a retrospective review of patients who underwent pituitary surgery between September 1998 and September 2008. Of 120 consecutive patients, 70 met inclusion criteria and were fully examined. The inclusion criteria were that patients had undergone endonasal transsphenoidal pituitary surgery performed by the same neurosurgeon at the same institution. Nineteen of the patients were treated using intraoperative fluoroscopy and 48 were treated using the BrainLAB VectorVision neuronavigation system. Preparation times, surgical times and associated complications were analyzed. Results: Our results indicate that image guidance reduces the overall operating room time and complication rate. Average preparation time for fluoroscopy and computer-based neuronavigation was 70.3 and 67.3min, respectively (p=0.3299). Average surgical time with fluoroscopy and BrainLAB was 131 and 107.9min, respectively (p=0.0079). The results were also analyzed with regard to other parameters such as associated complications, age and diagnoses. Conclusion: Computer guided endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery provides a three-dimensional image to the surgeon, allowing for greater visual accuracy and surgical precision and a faster procedure without radiation exposure or the need for additional personnel.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)47-53
Number of pages7
JournalComputer Aided Surgery
Volume16
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2011

Fingerprint

Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures
Neuronavigation
Surgery
Fluoroscopy
Operative Time
Operating rooms
Three-Dimensional Imaging
Operating Rooms
Personnel
Radiation

Keywords

  • Fluoroscopy
  • Pituitary
  • endoscopic
  • image guidance
  • transsphenoidal

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Re-evaluation of the role of image guidance in minimally invasive pituitary surgery : Benefits and outcomes. / Patel, Samip N.; Youssef, A. Samy; Vale, Fernando L.; Padhya, Tapan A.

In: Computer Aided Surgery, Vol. 16, No. 2, 01.03.2011, p. 47-53.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{89a8a3a8ca4e41d099c5d7be9f3d3878,
title = "Re-evaluation of the role of image guidance in minimally invasive pituitary surgery: Benefits and outcomes",
abstract = "Objective: To evaluate the utility of performing endonasal transsphenoidal pituitary surgery with computer-based neuronavigation, and to examine the efficacy of computer-based neuronavigation compared to fluoroscopy. Patients: We conducted a retrospective review of patients who underwent pituitary surgery between September 1998 and September 2008. Of 120 consecutive patients, 70 met inclusion criteria and were fully examined. The inclusion criteria were that patients had undergone endonasal transsphenoidal pituitary surgery performed by the same neurosurgeon at the same institution. Nineteen of the patients were treated using intraoperative fluoroscopy and 48 were treated using the BrainLAB VectorVision neuronavigation system. Preparation times, surgical times and associated complications were analyzed. Results: Our results indicate that image guidance reduces the overall operating room time and complication rate. Average preparation time for fluoroscopy and computer-based neuronavigation was 70.3 and 67.3min, respectively (p=0.3299). Average surgical time with fluoroscopy and BrainLAB was 131 and 107.9min, respectively (p=0.0079). The results were also analyzed with regard to other parameters such as associated complications, age and diagnoses. Conclusion: Computer guided endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery provides a three-dimensional image to the surgeon, allowing for greater visual accuracy and surgical precision and a faster procedure without radiation exposure or the need for additional personnel.",
keywords = "Fluoroscopy, Pituitary, endoscopic, image guidance, transsphenoidal",
author = "Patel, {Samip N.} and Youssef, {A. Samy} and Vale, {Fernando L.} and Padhya, {Tapan A.}",
year = "2011",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3109/10929088.2011.552954",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "16",
pages = "47--53",
journal = "Computer Assisted Surgery",
issn = "1092-9088",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Re-evaluation of the role of image guidance in minimally invasive pituitary surgery

T2 - Benefits and outcomes

AU - Patel, Samip N.

AU - Youssef, A. Samy

AU - Vale, Fernando L.

AU - Padhya, Tapan A.

PY - 2011/3/1

Y1 - 2011/3/1

N2 - Objective: To evaluate the utility of performing endonasal transsphenoidal pituitary surgery with computer-based neuronavigation, and to examine the efficacy of computer-based neuronavigation compared to fluoroscopy. Patients: We conducted a retrospective review of patients who underwent pituitary surgery between September 1998 and September 2008. Of 120 consecutive patients, 70 met inclusion criteria and were fully examined. The inclusion criteria were that patients had undergone endonasal transsphenoidal pituitary surgery performed by the same neurosurgeon at the same institution. Nineteen of the patients were treated using intraoperative fluoroscopy and 48 were treated using the BrainLAB VectorVision neuronavigation system. Preparation times, surgical times and associated complications were analyzed. Results: Our results indicate that image guidance reduces the overall operating room time and complication rate. Average preparation time for fluoroscopy and computer-based neuronavigation was 70.3 and 67.3min, respectively (p=0.3299). Average surgical time with fluoroscopy and BrainLAB was 131 and 107.9min, respectively (p=0.0079). The results were also analyzed with regard to other parameters such as associated complications, age and diagnoses. Conclusion: Computer guided endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery provides a three-dimensional image to the surgeon, allowing for greater visual accuracy and surgical precision and a faster procedure without radiation exposure or the need for additional personnel.

AB - Objective: To evaluate the utility of performing endonasal transsphenoidal pituitary surgery with computer-based neuronavigation, and to examine the efficacy of computer-based neuronavigation compared to fluoroscopy. Patients: We conducted a retrospective review of patients who underwent pituitary surgery between September 1998 and September 2008. Of 120 consecutive patients, 70 met inclusion criteria and were fully examined. The inclusion criteria were that patients had undergone endonasal transsphenoidal pituitary surgery performed by the same neurosurgeon at the same institution. Nineteen of the patients were treated using intraoperative fluoroscopy and 48 were treated using the BrainLAB VectorVision neuronavigation system. Preparation times, surgical times and associated complications were analyzed. Results: Our results indicate that image guidance reduces the overall operating room time and complication rate. Average preparation time for fluoroscopy and computer-based neuronavigation was 70.3 and 67.3min, respectively (p=0.3299). Average surgical time with fluoroscopy and BrainLAB was 131 and 107.9min, respectively (p=0.0079). The results were also analyzed with regard to other parameters such as associated complications, age and diagnoses. Conclusion: Computer guided endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery provides a three-dimensional image to the surgeon, allowing for greater visual accuracy and surgical precision and a faster procedure without radiation exposure or the need for additional personnel.

KW - Fluoroscopy

KW - Pituitary

KW - endoscopic

KW - image guidance

KW - transsphenoidal

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79951834188&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79951834188&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3109/10929088.2011.552954

DO - 10.3109/10929088.2011.552954

M3 - Article

C2 - 21291344

AN - SCOPUS:79951834188

VL - 16

SP - 47

EP - 53

JO - Computer Assisted Surgery

JF - Computer Assisted Surgery

SN - 1092-9088

IS - 2

ER -