Reconceptualizing exploitation

New directions for an old concept in social stratification

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Rent theory has taken off in stratification research, and a conceptualization of exploitation derived from rent theory has become popular in models of economic inequality. Some have argued that rent theory provides a more appropriate foundation for scientifically studying exploitation and economic inequality than neo-Marxian conceptualizations rooted in the labor theory of value. This article develops a critique of the rent-based conceptualization of exploitation, and two possible directions for reformulating the concept. I argue that rent-based exploitation fails to identify either a normatively or empirically defensible baseline condition that identifies when exploitation is absent and how much exists when it is present. To develop a more useful baseline, social scientists can either ground the concept in the normative worldviews of economic actors (positive approach) or in the normative commitments of the analyst himself or herself (normative approach). I use the social scientific literatures on distributive justice and fairness norms and the philosophical literature on exploitation and distributive justice to develop these alternatives, and conclude by discussing the strengths and weaknesses of each approach.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)213-221
Number of pages9
JournalSocial Currents
Volume2
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2015

Fingerprint

social stratification
exploitation
rent
distributive justice
labor theory of value
economics
technical literature
worldview
social scientist
fairness
commitment

Keywords

  • Economic sociology
  • Inequality
  • Marxist sociology
  • Occupations and work
  • Organizations
  • Poverty and mobility
  • Theory

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences(all)

Cite this

Reconceptualizing exploitation : New directions for an old concept in social stratification. / Avent-Holt, Dustin R.

In: Social Currents, Vol. 2, No. 3, 2015, p. 213-221.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{31a4493c310a4ffcab7ab5be906f3229,
title = "Reconceptualizing exploitation: New directions for an old concept in social stratification",
abstract = "Rent theory has taken off in stratification research, and a conceptualization of exploitation derived from rent theory has become popular in models of economic inequality. Some have argued that rent theory provides a more appropriate foundation for scientifically studying exploitation and economic inequality than neo-Marxian conceptualizations rooted in the labor theory of value. This article develops a critique of the rent-based conceptualization of exploitation, and two possible directions for reformulating the concept. I argue that rent-based exploitation fails to identify either a normatively or empirically defensible baseline condition that identifies when exploitation is absent and how much exists when it is present. To develop a more useful baseline, social scientists can either ground the concept in the normative worldviews of economic actors (positive approach) or in the normative commitments of the analyst himself or herself (normative approach). I use the social scientific literatures on distributive justice and fairness norms and the philosophical literature on exploitation and distributive justice to develop these alternatives, and conclude by discussing the strengths and weaknesses of each approach.",
keywords = "Economic sociology, Inequality, Marxist sociology, Occupations and work, Organizations, Poverty and mobility, Theory",
author = "Avent-Holt, {Dustin R}",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1177/2329496515589854",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "2",
pages = "213--221",
journal = "Social Currents",
issn = "2329-4965",
publisher = "Sage Publications",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reconceptualizing exploitation

T2 - New directions for an old concept in social stratification

AU - Avent-Holt, Dustin R

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Rent theory has taken off in stratification research, and a conceptualization of exploitation derived from rent theory has become popular in models of economic inequality. Some have argued that rent theory provides a more appropriate foundation for scientifically studying exploitation and economic inequality than neo-Marxian conceptualizations rooted in the labor theory of value. This article develops a critique of the rent-based conceptualization of exploitation, and two possible directions for reformulating the concept. I argue that rent-based exploitation fails to identify either a normatively or empirically defensible baseline condition that identifies when exploitation is absent and how much exists when it is present. To develop a more useful baseline, social scientists can either ground the concept in the normative worldviews of economic actors (positive approach) or in the normative commitments of the analyst himself or herself (normative approach). I use the social scientific literatures on distributive justice and fairness norms and the philosophical literature on exploitation and distributive justice to develop these alternatives, and conclude by discussing the strengths and weaknesses of each approach.

AB - Rent theory has taken off in stratification research, and a conceptualization of exploitation derived from rent theory has become popular in models of economic inequality. Some have argued that rent theory provides a more appropriate foundation for scientifically studying exploitation and economic inequality than neo-Marxian conceptualizations rooted in the labor theory of value. This article develops a critique of the rent-based conceptualization of exploitation, and two possible directions for reformulating the concept. I argue that rent-based exploitation fails to identify either a normatively or empirically defensible baseline condition that identifies when exploitation is absent and how much exists when it is present. To develop a more useful baseline, social scientists can either ground the concept in the normative worldviews of economic actors (positive approach) or in the normative commitments of the analyst himself or herself (normative approach). I use the social scientific literatures on distributive justice and fairness norms and the philosophical literature on exploitation and distributive justice to develop these alternatives, and conclude by discussing the strengths and weaknesses of each approach.

KW - Economic sociology

KW - Inequality

KW - Marxist sociology

KW - Occupations and work

KW - Organizations

KW - Poverty and mobility

KW - Theory

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85028075804&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85028075804&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/2329496515589854

DO - 10.1177/2329496515589854

M3 - Article

VL - 2

SP - 213

EP - 221

JO - Social Currents

JF - Social Currents

SN - 2329-4965

IS - 3

ER -