REDUCE-PCP study

Radiographs in the emergency department utilization criteria evaluation-pediatric chest pain

Justin Neff, Melanie Anderson, Trent Stephenson, Joe Young, Halim Hennes, Robert E Suter

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Many emergency physicians order chest x-rays (CXRs) for pediatric patients who present with a chief complaint of chest pain despite a paucity of research to support this testing, which exposes patients to radiation, cost, and delays. Objectives: This study aimed to begin development of a decision making tool that will allow emergency physicians to selectively obtain CXR films in pediatric patients presenting with chest pain. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of 400 consecutive pediatric patients with a chief complaint of chest pain and reviewed charts to determine how many received a CXR and which clinical characteristics were present in all patients. Chest radiograph findings were graded for significance as follows: (1) no or minor clinical significance: normal result in the CXR film without effect on the immediate evaluation of a patient; (2) moderate clinical significance: only impact on plan for follow-up; and (3) major clinical significance: result in the CXR film directly affects immediate management. We then evaluated each chart for historical or examination findings that might identify criteria associated with positive radiographic findings to propose a set of criteria that could lead to the development of a decision rule that allows a reduced utilization while having a high sensitivity for clinically significant positive findings on CXR film. Results: Of the 400 pediatric patients reviewed, 63.5% (n = 254) received a CXR in the emergency department (ED). Of those receiving a CXR, only 8.26% (n = 21) had a finding that affected either ED management or follow-up planning. The criteria that would have identified all patients with positive results in the CXR films were abnormal vital signs, shortness of breath, palpitations, presence of comorbidities, abnormal or unilateral breath sounds, history of trauma, murmur, or cough. Conclusions: This pilot study demonstrates the potential for a decision rule to eliminate both cost and radiation exposure by using defined criteria to determine the need for a CXR in pediatric ED patients. We identified 8 simple criteria that would have identified all children who benefited from a CXR in this study. The next phase of this study will prospectively evaluate the utility of each of the criteria as part of a draft decision rule.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)451-454
Number of pages4
JournalPediatric Emergency Care
Volume28
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Chest Pain
Hospital Emergency Service
Thorax
Pediatrics
X-Rays
Emergencies
Physicians
Costs and Cost Analysis
Vital Signs
Cough
Dyspnea
Comorbidity
Decision Making
Cohort Studies
Retrospective Studies
Radiation

Keywords

  • chest pain
  • radiographs
  • utilization

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

REDUCE-PCP study : Radiographs in the emergency department utilization criteria evaluation-pediatric chest pain. / Neff, Justin; Anderson, Melanie; Stephenson, Trent; Young, Joe; Hennes, Halim; Suter, Robert E.

In: Pediatric Emergency Care, Vol. 28, No. 5, 01.05.2012, p. 451-454.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Neff, Justin ; Anderson, Melanie ; Stephenson, Trent ; Young, Joe ; Hennes, Halim ; Suter, Robert E. / REDUCE-PCP study : Radiographs in the emergency department utilization criteria evaluation-pediatric chest pain. In: Pediatric Emergency Care. 2012 ; Vol. 28, No. 5. pp. 451-454.
@article{7dafc9e958d642088915651f022cb88f,
title = "REDUCE-PCP study: Radiographs in the emergency department utilization criteria evaluation-pediatric chest pain",
abstract = "Background: Many emergency physicians order chest x-rays (CXRs) for pediatric patients who present with a chief complaint of chest pain despite a paucity of research to support this testing, which exposes patients to radiation, cost, and delays. Objectives: This study aimed to begin development of a decision making tool that will allow emergency physicians to selectively obtain CXR films in pediatric patients presenting with chest pain. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of 400 consecutive pediatric patients with a chief complaint of chest pain and reviewed charts to determine how many received a CXR and which clinical characteristics were present in all patients. Chest radiograph findings were graded for significance as follows: (1) no or minor clinical significance: normal result in the CXR film without effect on the immediate evaluation of a patient; (2) moderate clinical significance: only impact on plan for follow-up; and (3) major clinical significance: result in the CXR film directly affects immediate management. We then evaluated each chart for historical or examination findings that might identify criteria associated with positive radiographic findings to propose a set of criteria that could lead to the development of a decision rule that allows a reduced utilization while having a high sensitivity for clinically significant positive findings on CXR film. Results: Of the 400 pediatric patients reviewed, 63.5{\%} (n = 254) received a CXR in the emergency department (ED). Of those receiving a CXR, only 8.26{\%} (n = 21) had a finding that affected either ED management or follow-up planning. The criteria that would have identified all patients with positive results in the CXR films were abnormal vital signs, shortness of breath, palpitations, presence of comorbidities, abnormal or unilateral breath sounds, history of trauma, murmur, or cough. Conclusions: This pilot study demonstrates the potential for a decision rule to eliminate both cost and radiation exposure by using defined criteria to determine the need for a CXR in pediatric ED patients. We identified 8 simple criteria that would have identified all children who benefited from a CXR in this study. The next phase of this study will prospectively evaluate the utility of each of the criteria as part of a draft decision rule.",
keywords = "chest pain, radiographs, utilization",
author = "Justin Neff and Melanie Anderson and Trent Stephenson and Joe Young and Halim Hennes and Suter, {Robert E}",
year = "2012",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/PEC.0b013e31825355b5",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "28",
pages = "451--454",
journal = "Pediatric Emergency Care",
issn = "0749-5161",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - REDUCE-PCP study

T2 - Radiographs in the emergency department utilization criteria evaluation-pediatric chest pain

AU - Neff, Justin

AU - Anderson, Melanie

AU - Stephenson, Trent

AU - Young, Joe

AU - Hennes, Halim

AU - Suter, Robert E

PY - 2012/5/1

Y1 - 2012/5/1

N2 - Background: Many emergency physicians order chest x-rays (CXRs) for pediatric patients who present with a chief complaint of chest pain despite a paucity of research to support this testing, which exposes patients to radiation, cost, and delays. Objectives: This study aimed to begin development of a decision making tool that will allow emergency physicians to selectively obtain CXR films in pediatric patients presenting with chest pain. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of 400 consecutive pediatric patients with a chief complaint of chest pain and reviewed charts to determine how many received a CXR and which clinical characteristics were present in all patients. Chest radiograph findings were graded for significance as follows: (1) no or minor clinical significance: normal result in the CXR film without effect on the immediate evaluation of a patient; (2) moderate clinical significance: only impact on plan for follow-up; and (3) major clinical significance: result in the CXR film directly affects immediate management. We then evaluated each chart for historical or examination findings that might identify criteria associated with positive radiographic findings to propose a set of criteria that could lead to the development of a decision rule that allows a reduced utilization while having a high sensitivity for clinically significant positive findings on CXR film. Results: Of the 400 pediatric patients reviewed, 63.5% (n = 254) received a CXR in the emergency department (ED). Of those receiving a CXR, only 8.26% (n = 21) had a finding that affected either ED management or follow-up planning. The criteria that would have identified all patients with positive results in the CXR films were abnormal vital signs, shortness of breath, palpitations, presence of comorbidities, abnormal or unilateral breath sounds, history of trauma, murmur, or cough. Conclusions: This pilot study demonstrates the potential for a decision rule to eliminate both cost and radiation exposure by using defined criteria to determine the need for a CXR in pediatric ED patients. We identified 8 simple criteria that would have identified all children who benefited from a CXR in this study. The next phase of this study will prospectively evaluate the utility of each of the criteria as part of a draft decision rule.

AB - Background: Many emergency physicians order chest x-rays (CXRs) for pediatric patients who present with a chief complaint of chest pain despite a paucity of research to support this testing, which exposes patients to radiation, cost, and delays. Objectives: This study aimed to begin development of a decision making tool that will allow emergency physicians to selectively obtain CXR films in pediatric patients presenting with chest pain. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of 400 consecutive pediatric patients with a chief complaint of chest pain and reviewed charts to determine how many received a CXR and which clinical characteristics were present in all patients. Chest radiograph findings were graded for significance as follows: (1) no or minor clinical significance: normal result in the CXR film without effect on the immediate evaluation of a patient; (2) moderate clinical significance: only impact on plan for follow-up; and (3) major clinical significance: result in the CXR film directly affects immediate management. We then evaluated each chart for historical or examination findings that might identify criteria associated with positive radiographic findings to propose a set of criteria that could lead to the development of a decision rule that allows a reduced utilization while having a high sensitivity for clinically significant positive findings on CXR film. Results: Of the 400 pediatric patients reviewed, 63.5% (n = 254) received a CXR in the emergency department (ED). Of those receiving a CXR, only 8.26% (n = 21) had a finding that affected either ED management or follow-up planning. The criteria that would have identified all patients with positive results in the CXR films were abnormal vital signs, shortness of breath, palpitations, presence of comorbidities, abnormal or unilateral breath sounds, history of trauma, murmur, or cough. Conclusions: This pilot study demonstrates the potential for a decision rule to eliminate both cost and radiation exposure by using defined criteria to determine the need for a CXR in pediatric ED patients. We identified 8 simple criteria that would have identified all children who benefited from a CXR in this study. The next phase of this study will prospectively evaluate the utility of each of the criteria as part of a draft decision rule.

KW - chest pain

KW - radiographs

KW - utilization

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84861094873&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84861094873&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/PEC.0b013e31825355b5

DO - 10.1097/PEC.0b013e31825355b5

M3 - Article

VL - 28

SP - 451

EP - 454

JO - Pediatric Emergency Care

JF - Pediatric Emergency Care

SN - 0749-5161

IS - 5

ER -