Relationship of various infection control interventions to the prevalence of multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa among U.S. hospitals

Victor R. Buford, Vibha Kumar, Bernice Roberts Kennedy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background Health care–associated infections caused by antibiotic-resistant gram-negative bacteria, such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa, are an emerging and increasingly important public health threat. However, there are very few studies that examine the relationships between antimicrobial resistance strategies and interventions and the prevalence of antibiotic-resistant and multidrug-resistant strains of Pseudomonas. Methods The membership of the Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology was invited to participate in a Web-based survey of U.S. acute care hospital infection preventionists. Results A final sample of 225 completed responses was analyzed using correlational techniques. Resistance to gentamicin (r = 0.17, P = .01), imipenem (r = 0.18, P = .02), ceftazidime (r = 0.20, P = .03), and ciprofloxacin (r = 0.15, P = .03) all showed significant direct associations with epidemiologic investigation using molecular testing. A significant inverse relationship was found between resistance to ceftazidime and effective efforts in the identification and isolation of infected patients (r = −0.18, P = .02). Conclusions The finding of significant direct relationships between antimicrobial resistance and epidemiologic investigations using molecular testing suggests that the increased burden of resistance is associated with molecular testing rather than the intervention driving down rates. Effective identification and isolation of infected patients appeared to be associated with lower resistance rates. Further research is needed to uncover causal relationships.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)381-386
Number of pages6
JournalAmerican Journal of Infection Control
Volume44
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2016

Fingerprint

Patient Isolation
Ceftazidime
Infection Control
Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Anti-Bacterial Agents
Imipenem
Ciprofloxacin
Cross Infection
Pseudomonas
Gentamicins
Gram-Negative Bacteria
Public Health
Health
Infection
Research
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • antimicrobial resistance
  • infection control interventions
  • molecular diagnostics
  • Pseudomonas aeruginosa

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Epidemiology
  • Health Policy
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Infectious Diseases

Cite this

Relationship of various infection control interventions to the prevalence of multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa among U.S. hospitals. / Buford, Victor R.; Kumar, Vibha; Kennedy, Bernice Roberts.

In: American Journal of Infection Control, Vol. 44, No. 4, 01.04.2016, p. 381-386.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{676cd82deadd48ebb71c88ac47ee5bcb,
title = "Relationship of various infection control interventions to the prevalence of multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa among U.S. hospitals",
abstract = "Background Health care–associated infections caused by antibiotic-resistant gram-negative bacteria, such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa, are an emerging and increasingly important public health threat. However, there are very few studies that examine the relationships between antimicrobial resistance strategies and interventions and the prevalence of antibiotic-resistant and multidrug-resistant strains of Pseudomonas. Methods The membership of the Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology was invited to participate in a Web-based survey of U.S. acute care hospital infection preventionists. Results A final sample of 225 completed responses was analyzed using correlational techniques. Resistance to gentamicin (r = 0.17, P = .01), imipenem (r = 0.18, P = .02), ceftazidime (r = 0.20, P = .03), and ciprofloxacin (r = 0.15, P = .03) all showed significant direct associations with epidemiologic investigation using molecular testing. A significant inverse relationship was found between resistance to ceftazidime and effective efforts in the identification and isolation of infected patients (r = −0.18, P = .02). Conclusions The finding of significant direct relationships between antimicrobial resistance and epidemiologic investigations using molecular testing suggests that the increased burden of resistance is associated with molecular testing rather than the intervention driving down rates. Effective identification and isolation of infected patients appeared to be associated with lower resistance rates. Further research is needed to uncover causal relationships.",
keywords = "antimicrobial resistance, infection control interventions, molecular diagnostics, Pseudomonas aeruginosa",
author = "Buford, {Victor R.} and Vibha Kumar and Kennedy, {Bernice Roberts}",
year = "2016",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ajic.2015.10.033",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "44",
pages = "381--386",
journal = "American Journal of Infection Control",
issn = "0196-6553",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Relationship of various infection control interventions to the prevalence of multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa among U.S. hospitals

AU - Buford, Victor R.

AU - Kumar, Vibha

AU - Kennedy, Bernice Roberts

PY - 2016/4/1

Y1 - 2016/4/1

N2 - Background Health care–associated infections caused by antibiotic-resistant gram-negative bacteria, such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa, are an emerging and increasingly important public health threat. However, there are very few studies that examine the relationships between antimicrobial resistance strategies and interventions and the prevalence of antibiotic-resistant and multidrug-resistant strains of Pseudomonas. Methods The membership of the Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology was invited to participate in a Web-based survey of U.S. acute care hospital infection preventionists. Results A final sample of 225 completed responses was analyzed using correlational techniques. Resistance to gentamicin (r = 0.17, P = .01), imipenem (r = 0.18, P = .02), ceftazidime (r = 0.20, P = .03), and ciprofloxacin (r = 0.15, P = .03) all showed significant direct associations with epidemiologic investigation using molecular testing. A significant inverse relationship was found between resistance to ceftazidime and effective efforts in the identification and isolation of infected patients (r = −0.18, P = .02). Conclusions The finding of significant direct relationships between antimicrobial resistance and epidemiologic investigations using molecular testing suggests that the increased burden of resistance is associated with molecular testing rather than the intervention driving down rates. Effective identification and isolation of infected patients appeared to be associated with lower resistance rates. Further research is needed to uncover causal relationships.

AB - Background Health care–associated infections caused by antibiotic-resistant gram-negative bacteria, such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa, are an emerging and increasingly important public health threat. However, there are very few studies that examine the relationships between antimicrobial resistance strategies and interventions and the prevalence of antibiotic-resistant and multidrug-resistant strains of Pseudomonas. Methods The membership of the Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology was invited to participate in a Web-based survey of U.S. acute care hospital infection preventionists. Results A final sample of 225 completed responses was analyzed using correlational techniques. Resistance to gentamicin (r = 0.17, P = .01), imipenem (r = 0.18, P = .02), ceftazidime (r = 0.20, P = .03), and ciprofloxacin (r = 0.15, P = .03) all showed significant direct associations with epidemiologic investigation using molecular testing. A significant inverse relationship was found between resistance to ceftazidime and effective efforts in the identification and isolation of infected patients (r = −0.18, P = .02). Conclusions The finding of significant direct relationships between antimicrobial resistance and epidemiologic investigations using molecular testing suggests that the increased burden of resistance is associated with molecular testing rather than the intervention driving down rates. Effective identification and isolation of infected patients appeared to be associated with lower resistance rates. Further research is needed to uncover causal relationships.

KW - antimicrobial resistance

KW - infection control interventions

KW - molecular diagnostics

KW - Pseudomonas aeruginosa

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84955485849&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84955485849&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ajic.2015.10.033

DO - 10.1016/j.ajic.2015.10.033

M3 - Article

VL - 44

SP - 381

EP - 386

JO - American Journal of Infection Control

JF - American Journal of Infection Control

SN - 0196-6553

IS - 4

ER -