Reliability of psychophysiological responding as a function of trait anxiety

John G. Arena, Steve H Hobbs

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study examined the temporal stability of three psychophysiological responses (frontal electromyographic activity, hand surface temperature, and heart rate) recorded over four sessions (days 1, 2, 8, and 28) on 34 subjects, 17 with high Spielberger Trait Anxiety Inventory scores and 17 with low scores. Each session consisted of a 20-minute adaptation period, a baseline condition, and two stressors (one cognitive, the other physical). Two forms of reliability coefficients were employed, intraclass correlations and Pearson Product Moment; the two types of reliability coefficients arrived at the same conclusions. Results indicated that reliability coefficients for the two anxiety groups did not differ on frontal EMG or heart rate responses; however, hand surface temperature responding was considerably less reliable for high anxious individuals than low anxious individuals. Reliability coefficients on absolute scores were, for the most part, reliable. Treating the responses as relative measures (percent change from baseline or simple change scores from baseline) produced smaller and less reliable coefficients. Magnitudes of the three physiological responses did not significantly differ as a function of high or low trait anxiety. Findings are discussed in terms of their clinical, as well as basic psychophysiological, importance.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)19-37
Number of pages19
JournalBiofeedback and Self-Regulation
Volume20
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 1995

Fingerprint

anxiety
Anxiety
Hand
Heart Rate
surface temperature
heart rate
Temperature
hands
Reproducibility of Results
physiological response
Equipment and Supplies

Keywords

  • anxiety
  • electromyogram
  • heart rate
  • human
  • reliability
  • skin temperature

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)

Cite this

Reliability of psychophysiological responding as a function of trait anxiety. / Arena, John G.; Hobbs, Steve H.

In: Biofeedback and Self-Regulation, Vol. 20, No. 1, 01.03.1995, p. 19-37.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Arena, John G. ; Hobbs, Steve H. / Reliability of psychophysiological responding as a function of trait anxiety. In: Biofeedback and Self-Regulation. 1995 ; Vol. 20, No. 1. pp. 19-37.
@article{cef925547eb54a8ca8f1ba3216392891,
title = "Reliability of psychophysiological responding as a function of trait anxiety",
abstract = "This study examined the temporal stability of three psychophysiological responses (frontal electromyographic activity, hand surface temperature, and heart rate) recorded over four sessions (days 1, 2, 8, and 28) on 34 subjects, 17 with high Spielberger Trait Anxiety Inventory scores and 17 with low scores. Each session consisted of a 20-minute adaptation period, a baseline condition, and two stressors (one cognitive, the other physical). Two forms of reliability coefficients were employed, intraclass correlations and Pearson Product Moment; the two types of reliability coefficients arrived at the same conclusions. Results indicated that reliability coefficients for the two anxiety groups did not differ on frontal EMG or heart rate responses; however, hand surface temperature responding was considerably less reliable for high anxious individuals than low anxious individuals. Reliability coefficients on absolute scores were, for the most part, reliable. Treating the responses as relative measures (percent change from baseline or simple change scores from baseline) produced smaller and less reliable coefficients. Magnitudes of the three physiological responses did not significantly differ as a function of high or low trait anxiety. Findings are discussed in terms of their clinical, as well as basic psychophysiological, importance.",
keywords = "anxiety, electromyogram, heart rate, human, reliability, skin temperature",
author = "Arena, {John G.} and Hobbs, {Steve H}",
year = "1995",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/BF01712764",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
pages = "19--37",
journal = "Applied Psychophysiology Biofeedback",
issn = "1090-0586",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reliability of psychophysiological responding as a function of trait anxiety

AU - Arena, John G.

AU - Hobbs, Steve H

PY - 1995/3/1

Y1 - 1995/3/1

N2 - This study examined the temporal stability of three psychophysiological responses (frontal electromyographic activity, hand surface temperature, and heart rate) recorded over four sessions (days 1, 2, 8, and 28) on 34 subjects, 17 with high Spielberger Trait Anxiety Inventory scores and 17 with low scores. Each session consisted of a 20-minute adaptation period, a baseline condition, and two stressors (one cognitive, the other physical). Two forms of reliability coefficients were employed, intraclass correlations and Pearson Product Moment; the two types of reliability coefficients arrived at the same conclusions. Results indicated that reliability coefficients for the two anxiety groups did not differ on frontal EMG or heart rate responses; however, hand surface temperature responding was considerably less reliable for high anxious individuals than low anxious individuals. Reliability coefficients on absolute scores were, for the most part, reliable. Treating the responses as relative measures (percent change from baseline or simple change scores from baseline) produced smaller and less reliable coefficients. Magnitudes of the three physiological responses did not significantly differ as a function of high or low trait anxiety. Findings are discussed in terms of their clinical, as well as basic psychophysiological, importance.

AB - This study examined the temporal stability of three psychophysiological responses (frontal electromyographic activity, hand surface temperature, and heart rate) recorded over four sessions (days 1, 2, 8, and 28) on 34 subjects, 17 with high Spielberger Trait Anxiety Inventory scores and 17 with low scores. Each session consisted of a 20-minute adaptation period, a baseline condition, and two stressors (one cognitive, the other physical). Two forms of reliability coefficients were employed, intraclass correlations and Pearson Product Moment; the two types of reliability coefficients arrived at the same conclusions. Results indicated that reliability coefficients for the two anxiety groups did not differ on frontal EMG or heart rate responses; however, hand surface temperature responding was considerably less reliable for high anxious individuals than low anxious individuals. Reliability coefficients on absolute scores were, for the most part, reliable. Treating the responses as relative measures (percent change from baseline or simple change scores from baseline) produced smaller and less reliable coefficients. Magnitudes of the three physiological responses did not significantly differ as a function of high or low trait anxiety. Findings are discussed in terms of their clinical, as well as basic psychophysiological, importance.

KW - anxiety

KW - electromyogram

KW - heart rate

KW - human

KW - reliability

KW - skin temperature

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0029267612&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0029267612&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/BF01712764

DO - 10.1007/BF01712764

M3 - Article

C2 - 7786924

AN - SCOPUS:0029267612

VL - 20

SP - 19

EP - 37

JO - Applied Psychophysiology Biofeedback

JF - Applied Psychophysiology Biofeedback

SN - 1090-0586

IS - 1

ER -