Remote Access Robotic Facelift Thyroidectomy: A Multi-institutional Experience

William S. Duke, F. Christopher Holsinger, Emad Kandil, Jeremy D. Richmon, Michael C. Singer, David J Terris

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Robotic facelift thyroidectomy (RFT) was developed as a new surgical approach to the thyroid gland using a remote incision site. Early favorable results led to this confirmatory multi-institutional experience. Methods: Prospectively collected data on consecutive patients undergoing RFT in five North American academic endocrine surgical practices were compiled. Surgical indications, operative times, final pathology, nodule size, complications, and postoperative management (drain use and length of hospital stay) were evaluated. Results: A total of 102 RFT procedures were undertaken in 90 patients. All but one of the patients (98.9 %) were female, and the mean age was 41.9 ± 13.1 years (range 12–69 years). The indication for surgery was nodular disease in 91.2 % of cases; 8.8 % were completion procedures performed for a diagnosis of cancer. The mean size of the largest nodule was 1.9 cm (range 0–5.6 cm). The mean total operative time for a thyroid lobectomy was 162 min (range 82–265 min). No permanent complications occurred. There were 4 cases (3.9 %) of transient recurrent laryngeal nerve weakness, no cases of hypocalcemia, and 3 (2.9 %) hematomas. There were no conversions to an anterior cervical approach. The majority of patients were managed on an outpatient basis (61.8 %) and without a drain (65.7 %). Conclusions: RFT is technically feasible and safe in selected patients. RFT can continue to be offered to carefully selected patients as a way to avoid a visible cervical scar. Future prospective studies to compare this novel approach to other remote access approaches are warranted.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)116-121
Number of pages6
JournalWorld Journal of Surgery
Volume41
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2017

Fingerprint

Rhytidoplasty
Thyroidectomy
Robotics
Operative Time
Length of Stay
Thyroid Gland
Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve
Hypocalcemia
Hematoma
Cicatrix
Outpatients
Prospective Studies
Pathology
Neoplasms

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Remote Access Robotic Facelift Thyroidectomy : A Multi-institutional Experience. / Duke, William S.; Holsinger, F. Christopher; Kandil, Emad; Richmon, Jeremy D.; Singer, Michael C.; Terris, David J.

In: World Journal of Surgery, Vol. 41, No. 1, 01.01.2017, p. 116-121.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Duke, William S. ; Holsinger, F. Christopher ; Kandil, Emad ; Richmon, Jeremy D. ; Singer, Michael C. ; Terris, David J. / Remote Access Robotic Facelift Thyroidectomy : A Multi-institutional Experience. In: World Journal of Surgery. 2017 ; Vol. 41, No. 1. pp. 116-121.
@article{5458db3c2a8c42739c0dd0f023e39334,
title = "Remote Access Robotic Facelift Thyroidectomy: A Multi-institutional Experience",
abstract = "Background: Robotic facelift thyroidectomy (RFT) was developed as a new surgical approach to the thyroid gland using a remote incision site. Early favorable results led to this confirmatory multi-institutional experience. Methods: Prospectively collected data on consecutive patients undergoing RFT in five North American academic endocrine surgical practices were compiled. Surgical indications, operative times, final pathology, nodule size, complications, and postoperative management (drain use and length of hospital stay) were evaluated. Results: A total of 102 RFT procedures were undertaken in 90 patients. All but one of the patients (98.9 {\%}) were female, and the mean age was 41.9 ± 13.1 years (range 12–69 years). The indication for surgery was nodular disease in 91.2 {\%} of cases; 8.8 {\%} were completion procedures performed for a diagnosis of cancer. The mean size of the largest nodule was 1.9 cm (range 0–5.6 cm). The mean total operative time for a thyroid lobectomy was 162 min (range 82–265 min). No permanent complications occurred. There were 4 cases (3.9 {\%}) of transient recurrent laryngeal nerve weakness, no cases of hypocalcemia, and 3 (2.9 {\%}) hematomas. There were no conversions to an anterior cervical approach. The majority of patients were managed on an outpatient basis (61.8 {\%}) and without a drain (65.7 {\%}). Conclusions: RFT is technically feasible and safe in selected patients. RFT can continue to be offered to carefully selected patients as a way to avoid a visible cervical scar. Future prospective studies to compare this novel approach to other remote access approaches are warranted.",
author = "Duke, {William S.} and Holsinger, {F. Christopher} and Emad Kandil and Richmon, {Jeremy D.} and Singer, {Michael C.} and Terris, {David J}",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s00268-016-3738-0",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "41",
pages = "116--121",
journal = "World Journal of Surgery",
issn = "0364-2313",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Remote Access Robotic Facelift Thyroidectomy

T2 - A Multi-institutional Experience

AU - Duke, William S.

AU - Holsinger, F. Christopher

AU - Kandil, Emad

AU - Richmon, Jeremy D.

AU - Singer, Michael C.

AU - Terris, David J

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - Background: Robotic facelift thyroidectomy (RFT) was developed as a new surgical approach to the thyroid gland using a remote incision site. Early favorable results led to this confirmatory multi-institutional experience. Methods: Prospectively collected data on consecutive patients undergoing RFT in five North American academic endocrine surgical practices were compiled. Surgical indications, operative times, final pathology, nodule size, complications, and postoperative management (drain use and length of hospital stay) were evaluated. Results: A total of 102 RFT procedures were undertaken in 90 patients. All but one of the patients (98.9 %) were female, and the mean age was 41.9 ± 13.1 years (range 12–69 years). The indication for surgery was nodular disease in 91.2 % of cases; 8.8 % were completion procedures performed for a diagnosis of cancer. The mean size of the largest nodule was 1.9 cm (range 0–5.6 cm). The mean total operative time for a thyroid lobectomy was 162 min (range 82–265 min). No permanent complications occurred. There were 4 cases (3.9 %) of transient recurrent laryngeal nerve weakness, no cases of hypocalcemia, and 3 (2.9 %) hematomas. There were no conversions to an anterior cervical approach. The majority of patients were managed on an outpatient basis (61.8 %) and without a drain (65.7 %). Conclusions: RFT is technically feasible and safe in selected patients. RFT can continue to be offered to carefully selected patients as a way to avoid a visible cervical scar. Future prospective studies to compare this novel approach to other remote access approaches are warranted.

AB - Background: Robotic facelift thyroidectomy (RFT) was developed as a new surgical approach to the thyroid gland using a remote incision site. Early favorable results led to this confirmatory multi-institutional experience. Methods: Prospectively collected data on consecutive patients undergoing RFT in five North American academic endocrine surgical practices were compiled. Surgical indications, operative times, final pathology, nodule size, complications, and postoperative management (drain use and length of hospital stay) were evaluated. Results: A total of 102 RFT procedures were undertaken in 90 patients. All but one of the patients (98.9 %) were female, and the mean age was 41.9 ± 13.1 years (range 12–69 years). The indication for surgery was nodular disease in 91.2 % of cases; 8.8 % were completion procedures performed for a diagnosis of cancer. The mean size of the largest nodule was 1.9 cm (range 0–5.6 cm). The mean total operative time for a thyroid lobectomy was 162 min (range 82–265 min). No permanent complications occurred. There were 4 cases (3.9 %) of transient recurrent laryngeal nerve weakness, no cases of hypocalcemia, and 3 (2.9 %) hematomas. There were no conversions to an anterior cervical approach. The majority of patients were managed on an outpatient basis (61.8 %) and without a drain (65.7 %). Conclusions: RFT is technically feasible and safe in selected patients. RFT can continue to be offered to carefully selected patients as a way to avoid a visible cervical scar. Future prospective studies to compare this novel approach to other remote access approaches are warranted.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84991107811&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84991107811&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00268-016-3738-0

DO - 10.1007/s00268-016-3738-0

M3 - Article

C2 - 27738835

AN - SCOPUS:84991107811

VL - 41

SP - 116

EP - 121

JO - World Journal of Surgery

JF - World Journal of Surgery

SN - 0364-2313

IS - 1

ER -