Research collaboration experiences, good and bad

Dispatches from the front lines

Barry Bozeman, Monica Gaughan, Jan Youtie, Catherine P Slade, Heather Rimes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The scant literature on individual scientists collaboration dynamics is used to develop a provisional model of research collaboration effectiveness. It incorporates external, collaborator, and team management factors, forming the basis for our theoretically informed qualitative analysis. We use this provisional model to guide semi-structured interview themes, deriving data from 60 US academic researchers, selected from a range of scientific and engineering disciplines as well as one social sciences discipline (economics). We present our findings in the form of respondent quotations related to the provisional model. We then conduct a further content analysis on the organizing constructs of respondent-assessed good and bad collaboration responses. The results of this second thematic coding of the interview data form the basis for the refinement of our model to include additional indicators, and to discuss some preliminary expectations about the associative relationships among the external, collaborator, and team management factors that contribute to scientist collaboration.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)226-244
Number of pages19
JournalScience and Public Policy
Volume43
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2016

Fingerprint

experience
qualitative analysis
interview
management
quotation
coding
content analysis
social science
engineering
economics
literature
indicator
analysis

Keywords

  • Collaboration effectiveness
  • Collaboration team dynamics
  • Research collaboration

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Public Administration
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Cite this

Research collaboration experiences, good and bad : Dispatches from the front lines. / Bozeman, Barry; Gaughan, Monica; Youtie, Jan; Slade, Catherine P; Rimes, Heather.

In: Science and Public Policy, Vol. 43, No. 2, 01.04.2016, p. 226-244.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bozeman, Barry ; Gaughan, Monica ; Youtie, Jan ; Slade, Catherine P ; Rimes, Heather. / Research collaboration experiences, good and bad : Dispatches from the front lines. In: Science and Public Policy. 2016 ; Vol. 43, No. 2. pp. 226-244.
@article{771a5d7dadc0486f9c9d83bc1fbb7479,
title = "Research collaboration experiences, good and bad: Dispatches from the front lines",
abstract = "The scant literature on individual scientists collaboration dynamics is used to develop a provisional model of research collaboration effectiveness. It incorporates external, collaborator, and team management factors, forming the basis for our theoretically informed qualitative analysis. We use this provisional model to guide semi-structured interview themes, deriving data from 60 US academic researchers, selected from a range of scientific and engineering disciplines as well as one social sciences discipline (economics). We present our findings in the form of respondent quotations related to the provisional model. We then conduct a further content analysis on the organizing constructs of respondent-assessed good and bad collaboration responses. The results of this second thematic coding of the interview data form the basis for the refinement of our model to include additional indicators, and to discuss some preliminary expectations about the associative relationships among the external, collaborator, and team management factors that contribute to scientist collaboration.",
keywords = "Collaboration effectiveness, Collaboration team dynamics, Research collaboration",
author = "Barry Bozeman and Monica Gaughan and Jan Youtie and Slade, {Catherine P} and Heather Rimes",
year = "2016",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/scipol/scv035",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "43",
pages = "226--244",
journal = "Science and Public Policy",
issn = "0302-3427",
publisher = "Beech Tree Publishing",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Research collaboration experiences, good and bad

T2 - Dispatches from the front lines

AU - Bozeman, Barry

AU - Gaughan, Monica

AU - Youtie, Jan

AU - Slade, Catherine P

AU - Rimes, Heather

PY - 2016/4/1

Y1 - 2016/4/1

N2 - The scant literature on individual scientists collaboration dynamics is used to develop a provisional model of research collaboration effectiveness. It incorporates external, collaborator, and team management factors, forming the basis for our theoretically informed qualitative analysis. We use this provisional model to guide semi-structured interview themes, deriving data from 60 US academic researchers, selected from a range of scientific and engineering disciplines as well as one social sciences discipline (economics). We present our findings in the form of respondent quotations related to the provisional model. We then conduct a further content analysis on the organizing constructs of respondent-assessed good and bad collaboration responses. The results of this second thematic coding of the interview data form the basis for the refinement of our model to include additional indicators, and to discuss some preliminary expectations about the associative relationships among the external, collaborator, and team management factors that contribute to scientist collaboration.

AB - The scant literature on individual scientists collaboration dynamics is used to develop a provisional model of research collaboration effectiveness. It incorporates external, collaborator, and team management factors, forming the basis for our theoretically informed qualitative analysis. We use this provisional model to guide semi-structured interview themes, deriving data from 60 US academic researchers, selected from a range of scientific and engineering disciplines as well as one social sciences discipline (economics). We present our findings in the form of respondent quotations related to the provisional model. We then conduct a further content analysis on the organizing constructs of respondent-assessed good and bad collaboration responses. The results of this second thematic coding of the interview data form the basis for the refinement of our model to include additional indicators, and to discuss some preliminary expectations about the associative relationships among the external, collaborator, and team management factors that contribute to scientist collaboration.

KW - Collaboration effectiveness

KW - Collaboration team dynamics

KW - Research collaboration

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84964749530&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84964749530&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/scipol/scv035

DO - 10.1093/scipol/scv035

M3 - Article

VL - 43

SP - 226

EP - 244

JO - Science and Public Policy

JF - Science and Public Policy

SN - 0302-3427

IS - 2

ER -