Research collaboration in universities and academic entrepreneurship

The-state-of-the-art

Barry Bozeman, Daniel Fay, Catherine P Slade

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

167 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

There is abundant evidence that research collaboration has become the norm in every field of scientific and technical research. We provide a critical overview of the literature on research collaboration, focusing particularly on individual-level collaborations among university researchers, but we also give attention to university researchers' collaborations with researchers in other sectors, including industry. We consider collaborations aimed chiefly at expanding the base of knowledge (knowledge-focused collaborations) as well as ones focused on production of economic value and wealth (property-focused collaborations), the latter including most academic entrepreneurship research collaborations. To help organize our review we develop a framework for analysis, one that considers attributes of collaborators, collaborative process and organization characteristics as the affect collaboration choices and outcomes. In addition, we develop and use a "Propositional Table for Research Collaboration Literature," presented as an "Appendix" to this study. We conclude with some suggestions for possible improvement in research on collaboration including: (1) more attention to multiple levels of analysis and the interactions among them; (2) more careful measurement of impacts as opposed to outputs; (3) more studies on 'malpractice' in collaboration, including exploitation; (4) increased attention to collaborators' motives and the social psychology of collaborative teams.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-67
Number of pages67
JournalJournal of Technology Transfer
Volume38
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2013

Fingerprint

Academic entrepreneurship
Research collaboration
Economics
Industry
Levels of analysis
Entrepreneurship research
Exploitation
Wealth
Collaborative process
Social Psychology
Malpractice
Interaction
Economic value

Keywords

  • Academic entrepreneurship
  • Contributorship
  • Knowledge transfer
  • Research collaboration
  • Research effectiveness
  • Research productivity
  • Technology transfer

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business and International Management
  • Accounting
  • Engineering(all)

Cite this

Research collaboration in universities and academic entrepreneurship : The-state-of-the-art. / Bozeman, Barry; Fay, Daniel; Slade, Catherine P.

In: Journal of Technology Transfer, Vol. 38, No. 1, 01.01.2013, p. 1-67.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{5386f3337b064b4a96cc5c7eb52f5cea,
title = "Research collaboration in universities and academic entrepreneurship: The-state-of-the-art",
abstract = "There is abundant evidence that research collaboration has become the norm in every field of scientific and technical research. We provide a critical overview of the literature on research collaboration, focusing particularly on individual-level collaborations among university researchers, but we also give attention to university researchers' collaborations with researchers in other sectors, including industry. We consider collaborations aimed chiefly at expanding the base of knowledge (knowledge-focused collaborations) as well as ones focused on production of economic value and wealth (property-focused collaborations), the latter including most academic entrepreneurship research collaborations. To help organize our review we develop a framework for analysis, one that considers attributes of collaborators, collaborative process and organization characteristics as the affect collaboration choices and outcomes. In addition, we develop and use a {"}Propositional Table for Research Collaboration Literature,{"} presented as an {"}Appendix{"} to this study. We conclude with some suggestions for possible improvement in research on collaboration including: (1) more attention to multiple levels of analysis and the interactions among them; (2) more careful measurement of impacts as opposed to outputs; (3) more studies on 'malpractice' in collaboration, including exploitation; (4) increased attention to collaborators' motives and the social psychology of collaborative teams.",
keywords = "Academic entrepreneurship, Contributorship, Knowledge transfer, Research collaboration, Research effectiveness, Research productivity, Technology transfer",
author = "Barry Bozeman and Daniel Fay and Slade, {Catherine P}",
year = "2013",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s10961-012-9281-8",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "38",
pages = "1--67",
journal = "Journal of Technology Transfer",
issn = "0892-9912",
publisher = "Kluwer Academic Publishers",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Research collaboration in universities and academic entrepreneurship

T2 - The-state-of-the-art

AU - Bozeman, Barry

AU - Fay, Daniel

AU - Slade, Catherine P

PY - 2013/1/1

Y1 - 2013/1/1

N2 - There is abundant evidence that research collaboration has become the norm in every field of scientific and technical research. We provide a critical overview of the literature on research collaboration, focusing particularly on individual-level collaborations among university researchers, but we also give attention to university researchers' collaborations with researchers in other sectors, including industry. We consider collaborations aimed chiefly at expanding the base of knowledge (knowledge-focused collaborations) as well as ones focused on production of economic value and wealth (property-focused collaborations), the latter including most academic entrepreneurship research collaborations. To help organize our review we develop a framework for analysis, one that considers attributes of collaborators, collaborative process and organization characteristics as the affect collaboration choices and outcomes. In addition, we develop and use a "Propositional Table for Research Collaboration Literature," presented as an "Appendix" to this study. We conclude with some suggestions for possible improvement in research on collaboration including: (1) more attention to multiple levels of analysis and the interactions among them; (2) more careful measurement of impacts as opposed to outputs; (3) more studies on 'malpractice' in collaboration, including exploitation; (4) increased attention to collaborators' motives and the social psychology of collaborative teams.

AB - There is abundant evidence that research collaboration has become the norm in every field of scientific and technical research. We provide a critical overview of the literature on research collaboration, focusing particularly on individual-level collaborations among university researchers, but we also give attention to university researchers' collaborations with researchers in other sectors, including industry. We consider collaborations aimed chiefly at expanding the base of knowledge (knowledge-focused collaborations) as well as ones focused on production of economic value and wealth (property-focused collaborations), the latter including most academic entrepreneurship research collaborations. To help organize our review we develop a framework for analysis, one that considers attributes of collaborators, collaborative process and organization characteristics as the affect collaboration choices and outcomes. In addition, we develop and use a "Propositional Table for Research Collaboration Literature," presented as an "Appendix" to this study. We conclude with some suggestions for possible improvement in research on collaboration including: (1) more attention to multiple levels of analysis and the interactions among them; (2) more careful measurement of impacts as opposed to outputs; (3) more studies on 'malpractice' in collaboration, including exploitation; (4) increased attention to collaborators' motives and the social psychology of collaborative teams.

KW - Academic entrepreneurship

KW - Contributorship

KW - Knowledge transfer

KW - Research collaboration

KW - Research effectiveness

KW - Research productivity

KW - Technology transfer

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84872359434&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84872359434&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10961-012-9281-8

DO - 10.1007/s10961-012-9281-8

M3 - Review article

VL - 38

SP - 1

EP - 67

JO - Journal of Technology Transfer

JF - Journal of Technology Transfer

SN - 0892-9912

IS - 1

ER -