Resident satisfaction with radiation oncology training

Awad A. Ahmed, Stephen J Ramey, Mary K. Dean, Stella K. Yoo, Emma Holliday, Curtiland Deville, Cristiane Takita, Neha Vapiwala, Lynn D. Wilson, Reshma Jagsi, Charles R. Thomas, Raphael Yechieli

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: Residency training environments can differ significantly; therefore, resident satisfaction may vary widely among programs. Here, we sought to examine several variables in program satisfaction through a survey of radiation oncology (RO) trainees in the United States. Methods and materials: An anonymous, institutional review board-approved, internet-based survey was developed and distributed to U.S. residents in RO in September 2016. This email-based survey assessed program-specific factors with regard to workload, work-life balance, and education as well as resident-specific factors such as marital status and postgraduate year. Binomial multivariable regression assessed the correlations between these factors and the endpoint of resident-reported likelihood of selecting an alternative RO residency program if given the choice again. Results: A total of 215 residents completed the required survey sections, representing 29.3% of U.S. RO residents. When asked whether residency allowed for an adequate balance between work and personal life, the majority of residents (75.6%) agreed or strongly agreed, but a minority (9.3%) did not feel that residency allowed for sufficient time for personal life. The majority of residents (69.7%) indicated that they would choose the same residency program again, but 12.2% would have made a different choice. Almost three-fourths of residents (73.0%) felt that faculty and staff cared about the educational success of residents, but 9.27% did not. Binomial multivariable regression revealed that senior residents (odds ratio: 6.70; 95% confidence interval, 2.20-22.4) were more likely to desire a different residency program. In contrast, residents who reported constructive feedback use by the residency program (odds ratio:0.22; 95% confidence interval, 0.06-0.91) were more satisfied with their program choice. Conclusions: Most RO residents reported satisfaction with their choice of residency program, but seniors had higher rates of dissatisfaction. Possible interventions to improve professional satisfaction include incorporating constructive resident feedback to enhance the program. The potential impact of job market pressures on seniors should be further explored.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)234-239
Number of pages6
JournalAdvances in Radiation Oncology
Volume3
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2018

Fingerprint

Radiation Oncology
Internship and Residency
Odds Ratio
Confidence Intervals
Research Ethics Committees
Marital Status
Workload
Internet
Education
Pressure
Surveys and Questionnaires

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Ahmed, A. A., Ramey, S. J., Dean, M. K., Yoo, S. K., Holliday, E., Deville, C., ... Yechieli, R. (2018). Resident satisfaction with radiation oncology training. Advances in Radiation Oncology, 3(3), 234-239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2018.03.003

Resident satisfaction with radiation oncology training. / Ahmed, Awad A.; Ramey, Stephen J; Dean, Mary K.; Yoo, Stella K.; Holliday, Emma; Deville, Curtiland; Takita, Cristiane; Vapiwala, Neha; Wilson, Lynn D.; Jagsi, Reshma; Thomas, Charles R.; Yechieli, Raphael.

In: Advances in Radiation Oncology, Vol. 3, No. 3, 01.07.2018, p. 234-239.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ahmed, AA, Ramey, SJ, Dean, MK, Yoo, SK, Holliday, E, Deville, C, Takita, C, Vapiwala, N, Wilson, LD, Jagsi, R, Thomas, CR & Yechieli, R 2018, 'Resident satisfaction with radiation oncology training', Advances in Radiation Oncology, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 234-239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2018.03.003
Ahmed, Awad A. ; Ramey, Stephen J ; Dean, Mary K. ; Yoo, Stella K. ; Holliday, Emma ; Deville, Curtiland ; Takita, Cristiane ; Vapiwala, Neha ; Wilson, Lynn D. ; Jagsi, Reshma ; Thomas, Charles R. ; Yechieli, Raphael. / Resident satisfaction with radiation oncology training. In: Advances in Radiation Oncology. 2018 ; Vol. 3, No. 3. pp. 234-239.
@article{0efcfce53612482c81d3946e2a43b9fd,
title = "Resident satisfaction with radiation oncology training",
abstract = "Purpose: Residency training environments can differ significantly; therefore, resident satisfaction may vary widely among programs. Here, we sought to examine several variables in program satisfaction through a survey of radiation oncology (RO) trainees in the United States. Methods and materials: An anonymous, institutional review board-approved, internet-based survey was developed and distributed to U.S. residents in RO in September 2016. This email-based survey assessed program-specific factors with regard to workload, work-life balance, and education as well as resident-specific factors such as marital status and postgraduate year. Binomial multivariable regression assessed the correlations between these factors and the endpoint of resident-reported likelihood of selecting an alternative RO residency program if given the choice again. Results: A total of 215 residents completed the required survey sections, representing 29.3{\%} of U.S. RO residents. When asked whether residency allowed for an adequate balance between work and personal life, the majority of residents (75.6{\%}) agreed or strongly agreed, but a minority (9.3{\%}) did not feel that residency allowed for sufficient time for personal life. The majority of residents (69.7{\%}) indicated that they would choose the same residency program again, but 12.2{\%} would have made a different choice. Almost three-fourths of residents (73.0{\%}) felt that faculty and staff cared about the educational success of residents, but 9.27{\%} did not. Binomial multivariable regression revealed that senior residents (odds ratio: 6.70; 95{\%} confidence interval, 2.20-22.4) were more likely to desire a different residency program. In contrast, residents who reported constructive feedback use by the residency program (odds ratio:0.22; 95{\%} confidence interval, 0.06-0.91) were more satisfied with their program choice. Conclusions: Most RO residents reported satisfaction with their choice of residency program, but seniors had higher rates of dissatisfaction. Possible interventions to improve professional satisfaction include incorporating constructive resident feedback to enhance the program. The potential impact of job market pressures on seniors should be further explored.",
author = "Ahmed, {Awad A.} and Ramey, {Stephen J} and Dean, {Mary K.} and Yoo, {Stella K.} and Emma Holliday and Curtiland Deville and Cristiane Takita and Neha Vapiwala and Wilson, {Lynn D.} and Reshma Jagsi and Thomas, {Charles R.} and Raphael Yechieli",
year = "2018",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.adro.2018.03.003",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "3",
pages = "234--239",
journal = "Advances in Radiation Oncology",
issn = "2452-1094",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Resident satisfaction with radiation oncology training

AU - Ahmed, Awad A.

AU - Ramey, Stephen J

AU - Dean, Mary K.

AU - Yoo, Stella K.

AU - Holliday, Emma

AU - Deville, Curtiland

AU - Takita, Cristiane

AU - Vapiwala, Neha

AU - Wilson, Lynn D.

AU - Jagsi, Reshma

AU - Thomas, Charles R.

AU - Yechieli, Raphael

PY - 2018/7/1

Y1 - 2018/7/1

N2 - Purpose: Residency training environments can differ significantly; therefore, resident satisfaction may vary widely among programs. Here, we sought to examine several variables in program satisfaction through a survey of radiation oncology (RO) trainees in the United States. Methods and materials: An anonymous, institutional review board-approved, internet-based survey was developed and distributed to U.S. residents in RO in September 2016. This email-based survey assessed program-specific factors with regard to workload, work-life balance, and education as well as resident-specific factors such as marital status and postgraduate year. Binomial multivariable regression assessed the correlations between these factors and the endpoint of resident-reported likelihood of selecting an alternative RO residency program if given the choice again. Results: A total of 215 residents completed the required survey sections, representing 29.3% of U.S. RO residents. When asked whether residency allowed for an adequate balance between work and personal life, the majority of residents (75.6%) agreed or strongly agreed, but a minority (9.3%) did not feel that residency allowed for sufficient time for personal life. The majority of residents (69.7%) indicated that they would choose the same residency program again, but 12.2% would have made a different choice. Almost three-fourths of residents (73.0%) felt that faculty and staff cared about the educational success of residents, but 9.27% did not. Binomial multivariable regression revealed that senior residents (odds ratio: 6.70; 95% confidence interval, 2.20-22.4) were more likely to desire a different residency program. In contrast, residents who reported constructive feedback use by the residency program (odds ratio:0.22; 95% confidence interval, 0.06-0.91) were more satisfied with their program choice. Conclusions: Most RO residents reported satisfaction with their choice of residency program, but seniors had higher rates of dissatisfaction. Possible interventions to improve professional satisfaction include incorporating constructive resident feedback to enhance the program. The potential impact of job market pressures on seniors should be further explored.

AB - Purpose: Residency training environments can differ significantly; therefore, resident satisfaction may vary widely among programs. Here, we sought to examine several variables in program satisfaction through a survey of radiation oncology (RO) trainees in the United States. Methods and materials: An anonymous, institutional review board-approved, internet-based survey was developed and distributed to U.S. residents in RO in September 2016. This email-based survey assessed program-specific factors with regard to workload, work-life balance, and education as well as resident-specific factors such as marital status and postgraduate year. Binomial multivariable regression assessed the correlations between these factors and the endpoint of resident-reported likelihood of selecting an alternative RO residency program if given the choice again. Results: A total of 215 residents completed the required survey sections, representing 29.3% of U.S. RO residents. When asked whether residency allowed for an adequate balance between work and personal life, the majority of residents (75.6%) agreed or strongly agreed, but a minority (9.3%) did not feel that residency allowed for sufficient time for personal life. The majority of residents (69.7%) indicated that they would choose the same residency program again, but 12.2% would have made a different choice. Almost three-fourths of residents (73.0%) felt that faculty and staff cared about the educational success of residents, but 9.27% did not. Binomial multivariable regression revealed that senior residents (odds ratio: 6.70; 95% confidence interval, 2.20-22.4) were more likely to desire a different residency program. In contrast, residents who reported constructive feedback use by the residency program (odds ratio:0.22; 95% confidence interval, 0.06-0.91) were more satisfied with their program choice. Conclusions: Most RO residents reported satisfaction with their choice of residency program, but seniors had higher rates of dissatisfaction. Possible interventions to improve professional satisfaction include incorporating constructive resident feedback to enhance the program. The potential impact of job market pressures on seniors should be further explored.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85048101639&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85048101639&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.adro.2018.03.003

DO - 10.1016/j.adro.2018.03.003

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85048101639

VL - 3

SP - 234

EP - 239

JO - Advances in Radiation Oncology

JF - Advances in Radiation Oncology

SN - 2452-1094

IS - 3

ER -