Robotic facelift thyroidectomy: I. Preclinical simulation and morphometric assessment

Michael C. Singer, Melanie W. Seybt, David J Terris

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

44 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: Robotic thyroidectomy was introduced in the United States despite scant preclinical data. We pursued a systematic preclinical investigation of a new remote access, robotic thyroidectomy technique via a facelift incision, and sought to define differences in extent of dissection associated with this approach and a second, popular robotic thyroidectomy technique. Design: Surgical simulation and morphometric analysis in fresh human cadavers. Methods: Eleven specimens were obtained to complete four experiments designed to address two specific aims: to develop a reproducible surgical protocol for robotic removal of the thyroid through a facelift incision, and to quantify the extent of dissection required with two robotic thyroidectomy techniques. Results: The feasibility of the facelift approach was determined using an endoscopic technique, and two lobectomies were accomplished. Inanimate study of the optimal robotic positioning to facilitate resection was then completed. Three additional cadavers were used to develop a reproducible surgical protocol and define a stepwise algorithm of dissection. Seven specimens were used to simulate 28 robotic thyroidectomy dissection pockets. The mean area of dissection required for robotic facelift thyroidectomy was 39.2 ± 6.6 cm2 compared with 63.5 ± 9.6 cm2 for robotic axillary thyroidectomy, representing a difference of 38.3% (P <.0001). Conclusions: We have described and refined a reproducible surgical protocol for accomplishing a new robotic facelift thyroidectomy, and then quantified the reduced dissection required when comparing it with a transaxillary technique. Cautious clinical implementation to explore safety and feasibility appears to be justified.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1631-1635
Number of pages5
JournalLaryngoscope
Volume121
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2011

Fingerprint

Rhytidoplasty
Thyroidectomy
Robotics
Dissection
Cadaver
Thyroid Gland

Keywords

  • Robotic
  • cosmetic
  • endoscopic
  • facelift
  • remote access
  • thyroidectomy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology

Cite this

Robotic facelift thyroidectomy : I. Preclinical simulation and morphometric assessment. / Singer, Michael C.; Seybt, Melanie W.; Terris, David J.

In: Laryngoscope, Vol. 121, No. 8, 01.08.2011, p. 1631-1635.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Singer, Michael C. ; Seybt, Melanie W. ; Terris, David J. / Robotic facelift thyroidectomy : I. Preclinical simulation and morphometric assessment. In: Laryngoscope. 2011 ; Vol. 121, No. 8. pp. 1631-1635.
@article{2344515bdd4a4b90adada500ecc8a61c,
title = "Robotic facelift thyroidectomy: I. Preclinical simulation and morphometric assessment",
abstract = "Objectives: Robotic thyroidectomy was introduced in the United States despite scant preclinical data. We pursued a systematic preclinical investigation of a new remote access, robotic thyroidectomy technique via a facelift incision, and sought to define differences in extent of dissection associated with this approach and a second, popular robotic thyroidectomy technique. Design: Surgical simulation and morphometric analysis in fresh human cadavers. Methods: Eleven specimens were obtained to complete four experiments designed to address two specific aims: to develop a reproducible surgical protocol for robotic removal of the thyroid through a facelift incision, and to quantify the extent of dissection required with two robotic thyroidectomy techniques. Results: The feasibility of the facelift approach was determined using an endoscopic technique, and two lobectomies were accomplished. Inanimate study of the optimal robotic positioning to facilitate resection was then completed. Three additional cadavers were used to develop a reproducible surgical protocol and define a stepwise algorithm of dissection. Seven specimens were used to simulate 28 robotic thyroidectomy dissection pockets. The mean area of dissection required for robotic facelift thyroidectomy was 39.2 ± 6.6 cm2 compared with 63.5 ± 9.6 cm2 for robotic axillary thyroidectomy, representing a difference of 38.3{\%} (P <.0001). Conclusions: We have described and refined a reproducible surgical protocol for accomplishing a new robotic facelift thyroidectomy, and then quantified the reduced dissection required when comparing it with a transaxillary technique. Cautious clinical implementation to explore safety and feasibility appears to be justified.",
keywords = "Robotic, cosmetic, endoscopic, facelift, remote access, thyroidectomy",
author = "Singer, {Michael C.} and Seybt, {Melanie W.} and Terris, {David J}",
year = "2011",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/lary.21831",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "121",
pages = "1631--1635",
journal = "Laryngoscope",
issn = "0023-852X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Robotic facelift thyroidectomy

T2 - I. Preclinical simulation and morphometric assessment

AU - Singer, Michael C.

AU - Seybt, Melanie W.

AU - Terris, David J

PY - 2011/8/1

Y1 - 2011/8/1

N2 - Objectives: Robotic thyroidectomy was introduced in the United States despite scant preclinical data. We pursued a systematic preclinical investigation of a new remote access, robotic thyroidectomy technique via a facelift incision, and sought to define differences in extent of dissection associated with this approach and a second, popular robotic thyroidectomy technique. Design: Surgical simulation and morphometric analysis in fresh human cadavers. Methods: Eleven specimens were obtained to complete four experiments designed to address two specific aims: to develop a reproducible surgical protocol for robotic removal of the thyroid through a facelift incision, and to quantify the extent of dissection required with two robotic thyroidectomy techniques. Results: The feasibility of the facelift approach was determined using an endoscopic technique, and two lobectomies were accomplished. Inanimate study of the optimal robotic positioning to facilitate resection was then completed. Three additional cadavers were used to develop a reproducible surgical protocol and define a stepwise algorithm of dissection. Seven specimens were used to simulate 28 robotic thyroidectomy dissection pockets. The mean area of dissection required for robotic facelift thyroidectomy was 39.2 ± 6.6 cm2 compared with 63.5 ± 9.6 cm2 for robotic axillary thyroidectomy, representing a difference of 38.3% (P <.0001). Conclusions: We have described and refined a reproducible surgical protocol for accomplishing a new robotic facelift thyroidectomy, and then quantified the reduced dissection required when comparing it with a transaxillary technique. Cautious clinical implementation to explore safety and feasibility appears to be justified.

AB - Objectives: Robotic thyroidectomy was introduced in the United States despite scant preclinical data. We pursued a systematic preclinical investigation of a new remote access, robotic thyroidectomy technique via a facelift incision, and sought to define differences in extent of dissection associated with this approach and a second, popular robotic thyroidectomy technique. Design: Surgical simulation and morphometric analysis in fresh human cadavers. Methods: Eleven specimens were obtained to complete four experiments designed to address two specific aims: to develop a reproducible surgical protocol for robotic removal of the thyroid through a facelift incision, and to quantify the extent of dissection required with two robotic thyroidectomy techniques. Results: The feasibility of the facelift approach was determined using an endoscopic technique, and two lobectomies were accomplished. Inanimate study of the optimal robotic positioning to facilitate resection was then completed. Three additional cadavers were used to develop a reproducible surgical protocol and define a stepwise algorithm of dissection. Seven specimens were used to simulate 28 robotic thyroidectomy dissection pockets. The mean area of dissection required for robotic facelift thyroidectomy was 39.2 ± 6.6 cm2 compared with 63.5 ± 9.6 cm2 for robotic axillary thyroidectomy, representing a difference of 38.3% (P <.0001). Conclusions: We have described and refined a reproducible surgical protocol for accomplishing a new robotic facelift thyroidectomy, and then quantified the reduced dissection required when comparing it with a transaxillary technique. Cautious clinical implementation to explore safety and feasibility appears to be justified.

KW - Robotic

KW - cosmetic

KW - endoscopic

KW - facelift

KW - remote access

KW - thyroidectomy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79960953002&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79960953002&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/lary.21831

DO - 10.1002/lary.21831

M3 - Article

C2 - 21692075

AN - SCOPUS:79960953002

VL - 121

SP - 1631

EP - 1635

JO - Laryngoscope

JF - Laryngoscope

SN - 0023-852X

IS - 8

ER -