Robotic facelift thyroidectomy: II. Clinical feasibility and safety

David J Terris, Michael C. Singer, Melanie W. Seybt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

91 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: A number of remote access thyroidectomy techniques have been described in the last several years. These approaches are technically challenging, can be performed on only a limited patient population, and have been associated with significant complications. We describe a novel robotic facelift approach for thyroidectomy and report our initial clinical experience. Design: Planned analysis of a prospectively maintained database with institutional review board approval. Methods: Robotic facelift thyroidectomy (RFT) was performed on all patients. Demographic and surgical data were obtained and analyzed. Data collected included patient age, gender, body mass index (BMI), pathology, complications, and duration of surgery. Results: A total of 18 RFT procedures were undertaken in 14 patients. There were 13 females and 1 male, with a mean age of 33.7 ± 18.1 years (range: 12-70). The mean BMI was 26.9 ± 4.5. The procedures included 13 lobectomies, one bilateral thyroidectomy, and 3 completion thyroidectomies. All but the first procedure was performed on an outpatient basis without use of a drain. There were no conversions to open surgery, no permanent nerve injuries, and no cases of hypoparathyroidism. Operative times ranged from 97 to 193 minutes. Conclusions: RFT is a feasible remote access thyroidectomy approach. It appears from our initial experience that it may be performed in a safe and reproducible manner without a drain and on an outpatient basis. Additional clinical experience is warranted to further validate this technique.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1636-1641
Number of pages6
JournalLaryngoscope
Volume121
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2011

Fingerprint

Rhytidoplasty
Thyroidectomy
Robotics
Safety
Body Mass Index
Outpatients
Conversion to Open Surgery
Hypoparathyroidism
Research Ethics Committees
Operative Time
Demography
Databases
Pathology

Keywords

  • cosmetic
  • endoscopic
  • facelift
  • remote access
  • Robotic
  • thyroidectomy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology

Cite this

Robotic facelift thyroidectomy : II. Clinical feasibility and safety. / Terris, David J; Singer, Michael C.; Seybt, Melanie W.

In: Laryngoscope, Vol. 121, No. 8, 01.08.2011, p. 1636-1641.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Terris, David J ; Singer, Michael C. ; Seybt, Melanie W. / Robotic facelift thyroidectomy : II. Clinical feasibility and safety. In: Laryngoscope. 2011 ; Vol. 121, No. 8. pp. 1636-1641.
@article{291b543446a449538b30971b0658c883,
title = "Robotic facelift thyroidectomy: II. Clinical feasibility and safety",
abstract = "Objectives: A number of remote access thyroidectomy techniques have been described in the last several years. These approaches are technically challenging, can be performed on only a limited patient population, and have been associated with significant complications. We describe a novel robotic facelift approach for thyroidectomy and report our initial clinical experience. Design: Planned analysis of a prospectively maintained database with institutional review board approval. Methods: Robotic facelift thyroidectomy (RFT) was performed on all patients. Demographic and surgical data were obtained and analyzed. Data collected included patient age, gender, body mass index (BMI), pathology, complications, and duration of surgery. Results: A total of 18 RFT procedures were undertaken in 14 patients. There were 13 females and 1 male, with a mean age of 33.7 ± 18.1 years (range: 12-70). The mean BMI was 26.9 ± 4.5. The procedures included 13 lobectomies, one bilateral thyroidectomy, and 3 completion thyroidectomies. All but the first procedure was performed on an outpatient basis without use of a drain. There were no conversions to open surgery, no permanent nerve injuries, and no cases of hypoparathyroidism. Operative times ranged from 97 to 193 minutes. Conclusions: RFT is a feasible remote access thyroidectomy approach. It appears from our initial experience that it may be performed in a safe and reproducible manner without a drain and on an outpatient basis. Additional clinical experience is warranted to further validate this technique.",
keywords = "cosmetic, endoscopic, facelift, remote access, Robotic, thyroidectomy",
author = "Terris, {David J} and Singer, {Michael C.} and Seybt, {Melanie W.}",
year = "2011",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/lary.21832",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "121",
pages = "1636--1641",
journal = "Laryngoscope",
issn = "0023-852X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Robotic facelift thyroidectomy

T2 - II. Clinical feasibility and safety

AU - Terris, David J

AU - Singer, Michael C.

AU - Seybt, Melanie W.

PY - 2011/8/1

Y1 - 2011/8/1

N2 - Objectives: A number of remote access thyroidectomy techniques have been described in the last several years. These approaches are technically challenging, can be performed on only a limited patient population, and have been associated with significant complications. We describe a novel robotic facelift approach for thyroidectomy and report our initial clinical experience. Design: Planned analysis of a prospectively maintained database with institutional review board approval. Methods: Robotic facelift thyroidectomy (RFT) was performed on all patients. Demographic and surgical data were obtained and analyzed. Data collected included patient age, gender, body mass index (BMI), pathology, complications, and duration of surgery. Results: A total of 18 RFT procedures were undertaken in 14 patients. There were 13 females and 1 male, with a mean age of 33.7 ± 18.1 years (range: 12-70). The mean BMI was 26.9 ± 4.5. The procedures included 13 lobectomies, one bilateral thyroidectomy, and 3 completion thyroidectomies. All but the first procedure was performed on an outpatient basis without use of a drain. There were no conversions to open surgery, no permanent nerve injuries, and no cases of hypoparathyroidism. Operative times ranged from 97 to 193 minutes. Conclusions: RFT is a feasible remote access thyroidectomy approach. It appears from our initial experience that it may be performed in a safe and reproducible manner without a drain and on an outpatient basis. Additional clinical experience is warranted to further validate this technique.

AB - Objectives: A number of remote access thyroidectomy techniques have been described in the last several years. These approaches are technically challenging, can be performed on only a limited patient population, and have been associated with significant complications. We describe a novel robotic facelift approach for thyroidectomy and report our initial clinical experience. Design: Planned analysis of a prospectively maintained database with institutional review board approval. Methods: Robotic facelift thyroidectomy (RFT) was performed on all patients. Demographic and surgical data were obtained and analyzed. Data collected included patient age, gender, body mass index (BMI), pathology, complications, and duration of surgery. Results: A total of 18 RFT procedures were undertaken in 14 patients. There were 13 females and 1 male, with a mean age of 33.7 ± 18.1 years (range: 12-70). The mean BMI was 26.9 ± 4.5. The procedures included 13 lobectomies, one bilateral thyroidectomy, and 3 completion thyroidectomies. All but the first procedure was performed on an outpatient basis without use of a drain. There were no conversions to open surgery, no permanent nerve injuries, and no cases of hypoparathyroidism. Operative times ranged from 97 to 193 minutes. Conclusions: RFT is a feasible remote access thyroidectomy approach. It appears from our initial experience that it may be performed in a safe and reproducible manner without a drain and on an outpatient basis. Additional clinical experience is warranted to further validate this technique.

KW - cosmetic

KW - endoscopic

KW - facelift

KW - remote access

KW - Robotic

KW - thyroidectomy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79960940781&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79960940781&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/lary.21832

DO - 10.1002/lary.21832

M3 - Article

C2 - 21721012

AN - SCOPUS:79960940781

VL - 121

SP - 1636

EP - 1641

JO - Laryngoscope

JF - Laryngoscope

SN - 0023-852X

IS - 8

ER -