Search for a two-input model for future investigations of 'synaptic tagging' in freely moving animals in vivo

Hadir Hassan, Sabine Martina Frey, Julietta Uta Frey

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Processes of "synaptic tagging" guarantee synaptic input specificity after the induction of a protein synthesis-dependent late long-term potentiation (late-LTP). Distinct high-frequency stimulation can set a transient "synaptic tag" at the activated synapses, which captures plasticity-related proteins (PRPs) synthesized synapse-non-specifically in dendritic branches/compartments or the somata. Thus, only those synapses, which expressed a "tag", are also able to express late-LTP. Additionally, it was shown that the synthesis of PRPs is triggered by heterosynaptic, non-glutamatergic requirements during LTP-induction in tissue from adult animals. All these experiments were performed in hippocampal slices in vitro so far. Two questions now arise: first, is it possible to describe processes of 'synaptic tagging' in the intact, freely moving animal and second, is the stimulation of glutamatergic inputs sufficient to induce 'tagging' or is the co-activation of a modulatory-heterosynaptic input, also required for the process? We have first developed a technique, which allows us now to induce distinct forms of LTP at the ipsilateral CA1 site by specifically stimulating glutamatergic hippocampal structures at the contralateral site in the intact, freely moving rat. Thus, the used stimulation protocol allowed us to activate two separate synaptic inputs to the same neuronal stimulation, a pre-requisite for tagging-experiments to be investigated in vivo.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)220-228
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Neuroscience Methods
Volume152
Issue number1-2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 15 2006

Fingerprint

Synapses
Long-Term Potentiation
Proteins
Carisoprodol
In Vitro Techniques

Keywords

  • Contralateral CA1
  • Contralateral CA3
  • Hippocampus
  • In vivo
  • Ipsilateral CA1
  • Late-LTP
  • Long-term potentiation
  • Two-input model

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

Search for a two-input model for future investigations of 'synaptic tagging' in freely moving animals in vivo. / Hassan, Hadir; Frey, Sabine Martina; Frey, Julietta Uta.

In: Journal of Neuroscience Methods, Vol. 152, No. 1-2, 15.04.2006, p. 220-228.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hassan, Hadir ; Frey, Sabine Martina ; Frey, Julietta Uta. / Search for a two-input model for future investigations of 'synaptic tagging' in freely moving animals in vivo. In: Journal of Neuroscience Methods. 2006 ; Vol. 152, No. 1-2. pp. 220-228.
@article{a1ff251503d347e9a01eac6a016a71fb,
title = "Search for a two-input model for future investigations of 'synaptic tagging' in freely moving animals in vivo",
abstract = "Processes of {"}synaptic tagging{"} guarantee synaptic input specificity after the induction of a protein synthesis-dependent late long-term potentiation (late-LTP). Distinct high-frequency stimulation can set a transient {"}synaptic tag{"} at the activated synapses, which captures plasticity-related proteins (PRPs) synthesized synapse-non-specifically in dendritic branches/compartments or the somata. Thus, only those synapses, which expressed a {"}tag{"}, are also able to express late-LTP. Additionally, it was shown that the synthesis of PRPs is triggered by heterosynaptic, non-glutamatergic requirements during LTP-induction in tissue from adult animals. All these experiments were performed in hippocampal slices in vitro so far. Two questions now arise: first, is it possible to describe processes of 'synaptic tagging' in the intact, freely moving animal and second, is the stimulation of glutamatergic inputs sufficient to induce 'tagging' or is the co-activation of a modulatory-heterosynaptic input, also required for the process? We have first developed a technique, which allows us now to induce distinct forms of LTP at the ipsilateral CA1 site by specifically stimulating glutamatergic hippocampal structures at the contralateral site in the intact, freely moving rat. Thus, the used stimulation protocol allowed us to activate two separate synaptic inputs to the same neuronal stimulation, a pre-requisite for tagging-experiments to be investigated in vivo.",
keywords = "Contralateral CA1, Contralateral CA3, Hippocampus, In vivo, Ipsilateral CA1, Late-LTP, Long-term potentiation, Two-input model",
author = "Hadir Hassan and Frey, {Sabine Martina} and Frey, {Julietta Uta}",
year = "2006",
month = "4",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1016/j.jneumeth.2005.09.005",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "152",
pages = "220--228",
journal = "Journal of Neuroscience Methods",
issn = "0165-0270",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "1-2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Search for a two-input model for future investigations of 'synaptic tagging' in freely moving animals in vivo

AU - Hassan, Hadir

AU - Frey, Sabine Martina

AU - Frey, Julietta Uta

PY - 2006/4/15

Y1 - 2006/4/15

N2 - Processes of "synaptic tagging" guarantee synaptic input specificity after the induction of a protein synthesis-dependent late long-term potentiation (late-LTP). Distinct high-frequency stimulation can set a transient "synaptic tag" at the activated synapses, which captures plasticity-related proteins (PRPs) synthesized synapse-non-specifically in dendritic branches/compartments or the somata. Thus, only those synapses, which expressed a "tag", are also able to express late-LTP. Additionally, it was shown that the synthesis of PRPs is triggered by heterosynaptic, non-glutamatergic requirements during LTP-induction in tissue from adult animals. All these experiments were performed in hippocampal slices in vitro so far. Two questions now arise: first, is it possible to describe processes of 'synaptic tagging' in the intact, freely moving animal and second, is the stimulation of glutamatergic inputs sufficient to induce 'tagging' or is the co-activation of a modulatory-heterosynaptic input, also required for the process? We have first developed a technique, which allows us now to induce distinct forms of LTP at the ipsilateral CA1 site by specifically stimulating glutamatergic hippocampal structures at the contralateral site in the intact, freely moving rat. Thus, the used stimulation protocol allowed us to activate two separate synaptic inputs to the same neuronal stimulation, a pre-requisite for tagging-experiments to be investigated in vivo.

AB - Processes of "synaptic tagging" guarantee synaptic input specificity after the induction of a protein synthesis-dependent late long-term potentiation (late-LTP). Distinct high-frequency stimulation can set a transient "synaptic tag" at the activated synapses, which captures plasticity-related proteins (PRPs) synthesized synapse-non-specifically in dendritic branches/compartments or the somata. Thus, only those synapses, which expressed a "tag", are also able to express late-LTP. Additionally, it was shown that the synthesis of PRPs is triggered by heterosynaptic, non-glutamatergic requirements during LTP-induction in tissue from adult animals. All these experiments were performed in hippocampal slices in vitro so far. Two questions now arise: first, is it possible to describe processes of 'synaptic tagging' in the intact, freely moving animal and second, is the stimulation of glutamatergic inputs sufficient to induce 'tagging' or is the co-activation of a modulatory-heterosynaptic input, also required for the process? We have first developed a technique, which allows us now to induce distinct forms of LTP at the ipsilateral CA1 site by specifically stimulating glutamatergic hippocampal structures at the contralateral site in the intact, freely moving rat. Thus, the used stimulation protocol allowed us to activate two separate synaptic inputs to the same neuronal stimulation, a pre-requisite for tagging-experiments to be investigated in vivo.

KW - Contralateral CA1

KW - Contralateral CA3

KW - Hippocampus

KW - In vivo

KW - Ipsilateral CA1

KW - Late-LTP

KW - Long-term potentiation

KW - Two-input model

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33644781682&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33644781682&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2005.09.005

DO - 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2005.09.005

M3 - Article

VL - 152

SP - 220

EP - 228

JO - Journal of Neuroscience Methods

JF - Journal of Neuroscience Methods

SN - 0165-0270

IS - 1-2

ER -