Sensitivity and specificity of univariate MRI analysis of experimentally degraded cartilage

Ping-Chang Lin, David A. Reiter, Richard G. Spencer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

26 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

MRI is increasingly used to evaluate cartilage in tissue constructs, explants, and animal and patient studies. However, while mean values of MR parameters, including T1, T2, magnetization transfer rate km, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), and the dGEMRIC-derived fixed charge density, correlate with tissue status, the ability to classify tissue according to these parameters has not been explored. Therefore, the sensitivity and specificity with which each of these parameters was able to distinguish between normal and trypsin-degraded, and between normal and collagenase-degraded, cartilage explants were determined. Initial analysis was performed using a training set to determine simple group means to which parameters obtained from a validation set were compared. T1 and apparent diffusion coefficient showed the greatest ability to discriminate between normal and degraded cartilage. Further analysis with k-means clustering, which eliminates the need for a priori identification of sample status, generally performed comparably. Use of fuzzy c-means (FCM) clustering to define centroids likewise did not result in improvement in discrimination. Finally, an FCM clustering approach in which validation samples were assigned in a probabilistic fashion to control and degraded groups was implemented, reflecting the range of tissue characteristics seen with cartilage degradation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1311-1318
Number of pages8
JournalMagnetic Resonance in Medicine
Volume62
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Cartilage
Cluster Analysis
Sensitivity and Specificity
Collagenases
Trypsin
Control Groups

Keywords

  • Cartilage
  • Degradation
  • Osteoarthritis
  • Sensitivity
  • Specificity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Sensitivity and specificity of univariate MRI analysis of experimentally degraded cartilage. / Lin, Ping-Chang; Reiter, David A.; Spencer, Richard G.

In: Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Vol. 62, No. 5, 01.11.2009, p. 1311-1318.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lin, Ping-Chang ; Reiter, David A. ; Spencer, Richard G. / Sensitivity and specificity of univariate MRI analysis of experimentally degraded cartilage. In: Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 2009 ; Vol. 62, No. 5. pp. 1311-1318.
@article{77f5ece2a1534a6bbf07633fc5bed3b2,
title = "Sensitivity and specificity of univariate MRI analysis of experimentally degraded cartilage",
abstract = "MRI is increasingly used to evaluate cartilage in tissue constructs, explants, and animal and patient studies. However, while mean values of MR parameters, including T1, T2, magnetization transfer rate km, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), and the dGEMRIC-derived fixed charge density, correlate with tissue status, the ability to classify tissue according to these parameters has not been explored. Therefore, the sensitivity and specificity with which each of these parameters was able to distinguish between normal and trypsin-degraded, and between normal and collagenase-degraded, cartilage explants were determined. Initial analysis was performed using a training set to determine simple group means to which parameters obtained from a validation set were compared. T1 and apparent diffusion coefficient showed the greatest ability to discriminate between normal and degraded cartilage. Further analysis with k-means clustering, which eliminates the need for a priori identification of sample status, generally performed comparably. Use of fuzzy c-means (FCM) clustering to define centroids likewise did not result in improvement in discrimination. Finally, an FCM clustering approach in which validation samples were assigned in a probabilistic fashion to control and degraded groups was implemented, reflecting the range of tissue characteristics seen with cartilage degradation.",
keywords = "Cartilage, Degradation, Osteoarthritis, Sensitivity, Specificity",
author = "Ping-Chang Lin and Reiter, {David A.} and Spencer, {Richard G.}",
year = "2009",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/mrm.22110",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "62",
pages = "1311--1318",
journal = "Magnetic Resonance in Medicine",
issn = "0740-3194",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sensitivity and specificity of univariate MRI analysis of experimentally degraded cartilage

AU - Lin, Ping-Chang

AU - Reiter, David A.

AU - Spencer, Richard G.

PY - 2009/11/1

Y1 - 2009/11/1

N2 - MRI is increasingly used to evaluate cartilage in tissue constructs, explants, and animal and patient studies. However, while mean values of MR parameters, including T1, T2, magnetization transfer rate km, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), and the dGEMRIC-derived fixed charge density, correlate with tissue status, the ability to classify tissue according to these parameters has not been explored. Therefore, the sensitivity and specificity with which each of these parameters was able to distinguish between normal and trypsin-degraded, and between normal and collagenase-degraded, cartilage explants were determined. Initial analysis was performed using a training set to determine simple group means to which parameters obtained from a validation set were compared. T1 and apparent diffusion coefficient showed the greatest ability to discriminate between normal and degraded cartilage. Further analysis with k-means clustering, which eliminates the need for a priori identification of sample status, generally performed comparably. Use of fuzzy c-means (FCM) clustering to define centroids likewise did not result in improvement in discrimination. Finally, an FCM clustering approach in which validation samples were assigned in a probabilistic fashion to control and degraded groups was implemented, reflecting the range of tissue characteristics seen with cartilage degradation.

AB - MRI is increasingly used to evaluate cartilage in tissue constructs, explants, and animal and patient studies. However, while mean values of MR parameters, including T1, T2, magnetization transfer rate km, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), and the dGEMRIC-derived fixed charge density, correlate with tissue status, the ability to classify tissue according to these parameters has not been explored. Therefore, the sensitivity and specificity with which each of these parameters was able to distinguish between normal and trypsin-degraded, and between normal and collagenase-degraded, cartilage explants were determined. Initial analysis was performed using a training set to determine simple group means to which parameters obtained from a validation set were compared. T1 and apparent diffusion coefficient showed the greatest ability to discriminate between normal and degraded cartilage. Further analysis with k-means clustering, which eliminates the need for a priori identification of sample status, generally performed comparably. Use of fuzzy c-means (FCM) clustering to define centroids likewise did not result in improvement in discrimination. Finally, an FCM clustering approach in which validation samples were assigned in a probabilistic fashion to control and degraded groups was implemented, reflecting the range of tissue characteristics seen with cartilage degradation.

KW - Cartilage

KW - Degradation

KW - Osteoarthritis

KW - Sensitivity

KW - Specificity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70349741551&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=70349741551&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/mrm.22110

DO - 10.1002/mrm.22110

M3 - Article

VL - 62

SP - 1311

EP - 1318

JO - Magnetic Resonance in Medicine

JF - Magnetic Resonance in Medicine

SN - 0740-3194

IS - 5

ER -