Sequence analysis of chromosome 1 revealed different selection patterns between Chinese wild mice and laboratory strains

Fuyi Xu, Shixian Hu, Tianzhu Chao, Maochun Wang, Kai Li, Yuxun Zhou, Hongyan Xu, Junhua Xiao

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Both natural and artificial selection play a critical role in animals’ adaptation to the environment. Detection of the signature of selection in genomic regions can provide insights for understanding the function of specific phenotypes. It is generally assumed that laboratory mice may experience intense artificial selection while wild mice more natural selection. However, the differences of selection signature in the mouse genome and underlying genes between wild and laboratory mice remain unclear. In this study, we used two mouse populations: chromosome 1 (Chr 1) substitution lines (C1SLs) derived from Chinese wild mice and mouse genome project (MGP) sequenced inbred strains and two selection detection statistics: Fst and Tajima’s D to identify the signature of selection footprint on Chr 1. For the differentiation between the C1SLs and MGP, 110 candidate selection regions containing 47 protein coding genes were detected. A total of 149 selection regions which encompass 7.215 Mb were identified in the C1SLs by Tajima’s D approach. While for the MGP, we identified nearly twice selection regions (243) compared with the C1SLs which accounted for 13.27 Mb Chr 1 sequence. Through functional annotation, we identified several biological processes with significant enrichment including seven genes in the olfactory transduction pathway. In addition, we searched the phenotypes associated with the 47 candidate selection genes identified by Fst. These genes were involved in behavior, growth or body weight, mortality or aging, and immune systems which align well with the phenotypic differences between wild and laboratory mice. Therefore, the findings would be helpful for our understanding of the phenotypic differences between wild and laboratory mice and applications for using this new mouse resource (C1SLs) for further genetics studies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1111-1121
Number of pages11
JournalMolecular Genetics and Genomics
Volume292
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2017

Fingerprint

Chromosomes, Human, Pair 1
Sequence Analysis
Genome
Genetic Selection
Genes
Phenotype
Biological Phenomena
Olfactory Pathways
Immune System
Body Weight

Keywords

  • Chinese wild mice
  • Chromosome 1
  • Laboratory mice
  • Selection signature

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Molecular Biology
  • Genetics

Cite this

Sequence analysis of chromosome 1 revealed different selection patterns between Chinese wild mice and laboratory strains. / Xu, Fuyi; Hu, Shixian; Chao, Tianzhu; Wang, Maochun; Li, Kai; Zhou, Yuxun; Xu, Hongyan; Xiao, Junhua.

In: Molecular Genetics and Genomics, Vol. 292, No. 5, 01.10.2017, p. 1111-1121.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Xu, Fuyi ; Hu, Shixian ; Chao, Tianzhu ; Wang, Maochun ; Li, Kai ; Zhou, Yuxun ; Xu, Hongyan ; Xiao, Junhua. / Sequence analysis of chromosome 1 revealed different selection patterns between Chinese wild mice and laboratory strains. In: Molecular Genetics and Genomics. 2017 ; Vol. 292, No. 5. pp. 1111-1121.
@article{df07c54959454f3b9ce1704b39353ff2,
title = "Sequence analysis of chromosome 1 revealed different selection patterns between Chinese wild mice and laboratory strains",
abstract = "Both natural and artificial selection play a critical role in animals’ adaptation to the environment. Detection of the signature of selection in genomic regions can provide insights for understanding the function of specific phenotypes. It is generally assumed that laboratory mice may experience intense artificial selection while wild mice more natural selection. However, the differences of selection signature in the mouse genome and underlying genes between wild and laboratory mice remain unclear. In this study, we used two mouse populations: chromosome 1 (Chr 1) substitution lines (C1SLs) derived from Chinese wild mice and mouse genome project (MGP) sequenced inbred strains and two selection detection statistics: Fst and Tajima’s D to identify the signature of selection footprint on Chr 1. For the differentiation between the C1SLs and MGP, 110 candidate selection regions containing 47 protein coding genes were detected. A total of 149 selection regions which encompass 7.215 Mb were identified in the C1SLs by Tajima’s D approach. While for the MGP, we identified nearly twice selection regions (243) compared with the C1SLs which accounted for 13.27 Mb Chr 1 sequence. Through functional annotation, we identified several biological processes with significant enrichment including seven genes in the olfactory transduction pathway. In addition, we searched the phenotypes associated with the 47 candidate selection genes identified by Fst. These genes were involved in behavior, growth or body weight, mortality or aging, and immune systems which align well with the phenotypic differences between wild and laboratory mice. Therefore, the findings would be helpful for our understanding of the phenotypic differences between wild and laboratory mice and applications for using this new mouse resource (C1SLs) for further genetics studies.",
keywords = "Chinese wild mice, Chromosome 1, Laboratory mice, Selection signature",
author = "Fuyi Xu and Shixian Hu and Tianzhu Chao and Maochun Wang and Kai Li and Yuxun Zhou and Hongyan Xu and Junhua Xiao",
year = "2017",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s00438-017-1335-z",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "292",
pages = "1111--1121",
journal = "Molecular and General Genetics",
issn = "1617-4615",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sequence analysis of chromosome 1 revealed different selection patterns between Chinese wild mice and laboratory strains

AU - Xu, Fuyi

AU - Hu, Shixian

AU - Chao, Tianzhu

AU - Wang, Maochun

AU - Li, Kai

AU - Zhou, Yuxun

AU - Xu, Hongyan

AU - Xiao, Junhua

PY - 2017/10/1

Y1 - 2017/10/1

N2 - Both natural and artificial selection play a critical role in animals’ adaptation to the environment. Detection of the signature of selection in genomic regions can provide insights for understanding the function of specific phenotypes. It is generally assumed that laboratory mice may experience intense artificial selection while wild mice more natural selection. However, the differences of selection signature in the mouse genome and underlying genes between wild and laboratory mice remain unclear. In this study, we used two mouse populations: chromosome 1 (Chr 1) substitution lines (C1SLs) derived from Chinese wild mice and mouse genome project (MGP) sequenced inbred strains and two selection detection statistics: Fst and Tajima’s D to identify the signature of selection footprint on Chr 1. For the differentiation between the C1SLs and MGP, 110 candidate selection regions containing 47 protein coding genes were detected. A total of 149 selection regions which encompass 7.215 Mb were identified in the C1SLs by Tajima’s D approach. While for the MGP, we identified nearly twice selection regions (243) compared with the C1SLs which accounted for 13.27 Mb Chr 1 sequence. Through functional annotation, we identified several biological processes with significant enrichment including seven genes in the olfactory transduction pathway. In addition, we searched the phenotypes associated with the 47 candidate selection genes identified by Fst. These genes were involved in behavior, growth or body weight, mortality or aging, and immune systems which align well with the phenotypic differences between wild and laboratory mice. Therefore, the findings would be helpful for our understanding of the phenotypic differences between wild and laboratory mice and applications for using this new mouse resource (C1SLs) for further genetics studies.

AB - Both natural and artificial selection play a critical role in animals’ adaptation to the environment. Detection of the signature of selection in genomic regions can provide insights for understanding the function of specific phenotypes. It is generally assumed that laboratory mice may experience intense artificial selection while wild mice more natural selection. However, the differences of selection signature in the mouse genome and underlying genes between wild and laboratory mice remain unclear. In this study, we used two mouse populations: chromosome 1 (Chr 1) substitution lines (C1SLs) derived from Chinese wild mice and mouse genome project (MGP) sequenced inbred strains and two selection detection statistics: Fst and Tajima’s D to identify the signature of selection footprint on Chr 1. For the differentiation between the C1SLs and MGP, 110 candidate selection regions containing 47 protein coding genes were detected. A total of 149 selection regions which encompass 7.215 Mb were identified in the C1SLs by Tajima’s D approach. While for the MGP, we identified nearly twice selection regions (243) compared with the C1SLs which accounted for 13.27 Mb Chr 1 sequence. Through functional annotation, we identified several biological processes with significant enrichment including seven genes in the olfactory transduction pathway. In addition, we searched the phenotypes associated with the 47 candidate selection genes identified by Fst. These genes were involved in behavior, growth or body weight, mortality or aging, and immune systems which align well with the phenotypic differences between wild and laboratory mice. Therefore, the findings would be helpful for our understanding of the phenotypic differences between wild and laboratory mice and applications for using this new mouse resource (C1SLs) for further genetics studies.

KW - Chinese wild mice

KW - Chromosome 1

KW - Laboratory mice

KW - Selection signature

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85021166936&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85021166936&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00438-017-1335-z

DO - 10.1007/s00438-017-1335-z

M3 - Article

VL - 292

SP - 1111

EP - 1121

JO - Molecular and General Genetics

JF - Molecular and General Genetics

SN - 1617-4615

IS - 5

ER -