Shared decision-making in urology and female pelvic floor medicine and reconstructive surgery

David A. Ossin, Emily C. Carter, Rufus Cartwright, Philippe D. Violette, Shilpa Iyer, Geraldine T. Klein, Sangeeta Senapati, Zachary Klaassen, Sylvia M. Botros

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

Shared decision-making (SDM) is a hallmark of patient-centred care that uses informed consent to help guide patients with making complex health-care decisions. In SDM, patients and providers work together to determine the best course of action based on both the current available evidence and the patient’s values and preferences. SDM not only provides a framework for the legal and ethical obligations providers need to fulfil for informed consent, but also leads to improved knowledge of treatment options and satisfaction of decision-making for patients. Tools such as decision aids have been developed to support SDM for complex decisions. Several decision aids are available for use in the field of urology and female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery, but these decision aids are also associated with barriers to SDM implementation including patient, provider and systematic challenges. However, solutions to such barriers to SDM include continued development of SDM tools to improve patient engagement, expand training of providers in SDM communication models and a process to encourage implementation of SDM.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalNature Reviews Urology
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2021

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Shared decision-making in urology and female pelvic floor medicine and reconstructive surgery'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this