Shared expectations for protection of identifiable health care information: Report of a national consensus process

Matthew K. Wynia, Steven Scott Coughlin, Sheri Alpert, Deborah S. Cummins, Linda L. Emanuel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The Ethical Force Program is a collaborative effort to create performance measures for ethics in health care. This report lays out areas of consensus that may be amenable to performance measurement on protecting the privacy, confidentiality and security of identifiable health information. DESIGN: Iterative consensus development process. PARTICIPANTS: The program's oversight body and its expert panel on privacy include national leaders representing the perspectives of physicians, patients, purchasers, health plans, hospitals, and medical ethicists as well as public health, law, and medical informatics experts. METHODS AND MAIN RESULTS: The oversight body appointed a national Expert Advisory Panel on Privacy and Confidentiality in September 1998. This group compiled and reviewed existing norms, including governmental reports and legal standards, professional association policies, private organization statements and policies, accreditation standards, and ethical opinions. A set of specific and assessable expectations for ethical conduct in this domain was then drafted and refined through seven meetings over 16 months. In the final two iterations, each expectation was graded on a scale of 1 to 10 by each oversight body member on whether it was: (1) important, (2) universally applicable, (3) feasible to measure, and (4) realistic to implement. The expectations that did not score more than 7 (mean) on all 4 scales were reconsidered and retained only if the entire oversight body agreed that they should be used as potential subjects for performance measurement. Consensus was achieved on 34 specific expectations. The expectations fell into 8 content areas: addressing the need for transparency of policies and practices, consent for use and disclosure of identifiable information, limitations on what information can be collected and by whom, individuals' access to their own health records, security requirements for storage and transfer of information, provisions to ensure ongoing data quality, limitations on how identifiable information may be used, and provisions for meaningful accountability. CONCLUSIONS: This process established consensus on 34 measurable ethical expectations for the protection of privacy and confidentiality in health care. These expectations should apply to any organization with access to personally identifiable health information, including managed care organizations, physician groups, hospitals, other provider organizations, and purchasers. Performance measurement on these expectations may improve accountability across the health care system.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)100-111
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of General Internal Medicine
Volume16
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 12 2001
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Privacy
Confidentiality
Consensus
Delivery of Health Care
Social Responsibility
Health
Organizations
Public Health Informatics
Hospital-Physician Joint Ventures
Ethicists
Medical Informatics
Bioethics
Accreditation
Information Storage and Retrieval
Disclosure
Managed Care Programs
Physicians

Keywords

  • Health care information
  • Health policy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Internal Medicine

Cite this

Shared expectations for protection of identifiable health care information : Report of a national consensus process. / Wynia, Matthew K.; Coughlin, Steven Scott; Alpert, Sheri; Cummins, Deborah S.; Emanuel, Linda L.

In: Journal of General Internal Medicine, Vol. 16, No. 2, 12.03.2001, p. 100-111.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Wynia, Matthew K. ; Coughlin, Steven Scott ; Alpert, Sheri ; Cummins, Deborah S. ; Emanuel, Linda L. / Shared expectations for protection of identifiable health care information : Report of a national consensus process. In: Journal of General Internal Medicine. 2001 ; Vol. 16, No. 2. pp. 100-111.
@article{9a25c042a8ce476a8ec2e9142aa10cbf,
title = "Shared expectations for protection of identifiable health care information: Report of a national consensus process",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: The Ethical Force Program is a collaborative effort to create performance measures for ethics in health care. This report lays out areas of consensus that may be amenable to performance measurement on protecting the privacy, confidentiality and security of identifiable health information. DESIGN: Iterative consensus development process. PARTICIPANTS: The program's oversight body and its expert panel on privacy include national leaders representing the perspectives of physicians, patients, purchasers, health plans, hospitals, and medical ethicists as well as public health, law, and medical informatics experts. METHODS AND MAIN RESULTS: The oversight body appointed a national Expert Advisory Panel on Privacy and Confidentiality in September 1998. This group compiled and reviewed existing norms, including governmental reports and legal standards, professional association policies, private organization statements and policies, accreditation standards, and ethical opinions. A set of specific and assessable expectations for ethical conduct in this domain was then drafted and refined through seven meetings over 16 months. In the final two iterations, each expectation was graded on a scale of 1 to 10 by each oversight body member on whether it was: (1) important, (2) universally applicable, (3) feasible to measure, and (4) realistic to implement. The expectations that did not score more than 7 (mean) on all 4 scales were reconsidered and retained only if the entire oversight body agreed that they should be used as potential subjects for performance measurement. Consensus was achieved on 34 specific expectations. The expectations fell into 8 content areas: addressing the need for transparency of policies and practices, consent for use and disclosure of identifiable information, limitations on what information can be collected and by whom, individuals' access to their own health records, security requirements for storage and transfer of information, provisions to ensure ongoing data quality, limitations on how identifiable information may be used, and provisions for meaningful accountability. CONCLUSIONS: This process established consensus on 34 measurable ethical expectations for the protection of privacy and confidentiality in health care. These expectations should apply to any organization with access to personally identifiable health information, including managed care organizations, physician groups, hospitals, other provider organizations, and purchasers. Performance measurement on these expectations may improve accountability across the health care system.",
keywords = "Health care information, Health policy",
author = "Wynia, {Matthew K.} and Coughlin, {Steven Scott} and Sheri Alpert and Cummins, {Deborah S.} and Emanuel, {Linda L.}",
year = "2001",
month = "3",
day = "12",
doi = "10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.00515.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "16",
pages = "100--111",
journal = "Journal of General Internal Medicine",
issn = "0884-8734",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Shared expectations for protection of identifiable health care information

T2 - Report of a national consensus process

AU - Wynia, Matthew K.

AU - Coughlin, Steven Scott

AU - Alpert, Sheri

AU - Cummins, Deborah S.

AU - Emanuel, Linda L.

PY - 2001/3/12

Y1 - 2001/3/12

N2 - OBJECTIVE: The Ethical Force Program is a collaborative effort to create performance measures for ethics in health care. This report lays out areas of consensus that may be amenable to performance measurement on protecting the privacy, confidentiality and security of identifiable health information. DESIGN: Iterative consensus development process. PARTICIPANTS: The program's oversight body and its expert panel on privacy include national leaders representing the perspectives of physicians, patients, purchasers, health plans, hospitals, and medical ethicists as well as public health, law, and medical informatics experts. METHODS AND MAIN RESULTS: The oversight body appointed a national Expert Advisory Panel on Privacy and Confidentiality in September 1998. This group compiled and reviewed existing norms, including governmental reports and legal standards, professional association policies, private organization statements and policies, accreditation standards, and ethical opinions. A set of specific and assessable expectations for ethical conduct in this domain was then drafted and refined through seven meetings over 16 months. In the final two iterations, each expectation was graded on a scale of 1 to 10 by each oversight body member on whether it was: (1) important, (2) universally applicable, (3) feasible to measure, and (4) realistic to implement. The expectations that did not score more than 7 (mean) on all 4 scales were reconsidered and retained only if the entire oversight body agreed that they should be used as potential subjects for performance measurement. Consensus was achieved on 34 specific expectations. The expectations fell into 8 content areas: addressing the need for transparency of policies and practices, consent for use and disclosure of identifiable information, limitations on what information can be collected and by whom, individuals' access to their own health records, security requirements for storage and transfer of information, provisions to ensure ongoing data quality, limitations on how identifiable information may be used, and provisions for meaningful accountability. CONCLUSIONS: This process established consensus on 34 measurable ethical expectations for the protection of privacy and confidentiality in health care. These expectations should apply to any organization with access to personally identifiable health information, including managed care organizations, physician groups, hospitals, other provider organizations, and purchasers. Performance measurement on these expectations may improve accountability across the health care system.

AB - OBJECTIVE: The Ethical Force Program is a collaborative effort to create performance measures for ethics in health care. This report lays out areas of consensus that may be amenable to performance measurement on protecting the privacy, confidentiality and security of identifiable health information. DESIGN: Iterative consensus development process. PARTICIPANTS: The program's oversight body and its expert panel on privacy include national leaders representing the perspectives of physicians, patients, purchasers, health plans, hospitals, and medical ethicists as well as public health, law, and medical informatics experts. METHODS AND MAIN RESULTS: The oversight body appointed a national Expert Advisory Panel on Privacy and Confidentiality in September 1998. This group compiled and reviewed existing norms, including governmental reports and legal standards, professional association policies, private organization statements and policies, accreditation standards, and ethical opinions. A set of specific and assessable expectations for ethical conduct in this domain was then drafted and refined through seven meetings over 16 months. In the final two iterations, each expectation was graded on a scale of 1 to 10 by each oversight body member on whether it was: (1) important, (2) universally applicable, (3) feasible to measure, and (4) realistic to implement. The expectations that did not score more than 7 (mean) on all 4 scales were reconsidered and retained only if the entire oversight body agreed that they should be used as potential subjects for performance measurement. Consensus was achieved on 34 specific expectations. The expectations fell into 8 content areas: addressing the need for transparency of policies and practices, consent for use and disclosure of identifiable information, limitations on what information can be collected and by whom, individuals' access to their own health records, security requirements for storage and transfer of information, provisions to ensure ongoing data quality, limitations on how identifiable information may be used, and provisions for meaningful accountability. CONCLUSIONS: This process established consensus on 34 measurable ethical expectations for the protection of privacy and confidentiality in health care. These expectations should apply to any organization with access to personally identifiable health information, including managed care organizations, physician groups, hospitals, other provider organizations, and purchasers. Performance measurement on these expectations may improve accountability across the health care system.

KW - Health care information

KW - Health policy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035118122&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035118122&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.00515.x

DO - 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.00515.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 11251761

AN - SCOPUS:0035118122

VL - 16

SP - 100

EP - 111

JO - Journal of General Internal Medicine

JF - Journal of General Internal Medicine

SN - 0884-8734

IS - 2

ER -