Shared expectations for protection of identifiable health care information: Report of a national consensus process

Matthew K. Wynia, Steven S. Coughlin, Sheri Alpert, Deborah S. Cummins, Linda L. Emanuel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Scopus citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The Ethical Force Program is a collaborative effort to create performance measures for ethics in health care. This report lays out areas of consensus that may be amenable to performance measurement on protecting the privacy, confidentiality and security of identifiable health information. DESIGN: Iterative consensus development process. PARTICIPANTS: The program's oversight body and its expert panel on privacy include national leaders representing the perspectives of physicians, patients, purchasers, health plans, hospitals, and medical ethicists as well as public health, law, and medical informatics experts. METHODS AND MAIN RESULTS: The oversight body appointed a national Expert Advisory Panel on Privacy and Confidentiality in September 1998. This group compiled and reviewed existing norms, including governmental reports and legal standards, professional association policies, private organization statements and policies, accreditation standards, and ethical opinions. A set of specific and assessable expectations for ethical conduct in this domain was then drafted and refined through seven meetings over 16 months. In the final two iterations, each expectation was graded on a scale of 1 to 10 by each oversight body member on whether it was: (1) important, (2) universally applicable, (3) feasible to measure, and (4) realistic to implement. The expectations that did not score more than 7 (mean) on all 4 scales were reconsidered and retained only if the entire oversight body agreed that they should be used as potential subjects for performance measurement. Consensus was achieved on 34 specific expectations. The expectations fell into 8 content areas: addressing the need for transparency of policies and practices, consent for use and disclosure of identifiable information, limitations on what information can be collected and by whom, individuals' access to their own health records, security requirements for storage and transfer of information, provisions to ensure ongoing data quality, limitations on how identifiable information may be used, and provisions for meaningful accountability. CONCLUSIONS: This process established consensus on 34 measurable ethical expectations for the protection of privacy and confidentiality in health care. These expectations should apply to any organization with access to personally identifiable health information, including managed care organizations, physician groups, hospitals, other provider organizations, and purchasers. Performance measurement on these expectations may improve accountability across the health care system.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)100-111
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of General Internal Medicine
Volume16
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 12 2001
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Health care information
  • Health policy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Internal Medicine

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Shared expectations for protection of identifiable health care information: Report of a national consensus process'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this