Shear bond strength of zirconia-based ceramics veneered with 2 different techniques

Ahmed Morsy Elsayed Zaher, J. L. Hochstedler, Frederick Rueggeberg, Edwin L. Kee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Statement of problem Delamination of veneering ceramic is reported as one of the most frequent problems associated with veneered zirconia restorations. Purpose The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the shear bond strength of sintered lithium disilicate to that of pressed fluorapatite glass-ceramic on a zirconia substrate. Material and methods Thirty zirconia blocks (20×15×2.5-mm thick) were cut, sintered, and divided into 2 groups. A pressed group, a zirconia liner, was applied and sintered, and the lost-wax technique was used to fabricate fluorapatite glass-ceramic blocks (3×3×3 mm), which were pressed onto the sintered zirconia blocks. A sintered group, lithium disilicate blocks, were cut (3×3×3 mm) and sintered to the sintered zirconia blocks by using a low-fusing glass-ceramic. The thickness of the low-fusing glass-ceramic was standardized to approximately 80 μm prior to sintering. The shear bond strength levels of the specimens were tested using a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min until failure. Representative separated specimen surfaces were examined for fracture characteristics, using scanning electron microscopy at ×50 magnification. Debonding data were compared using a 2-tailed, unpaired Student t test (α=.05). Results The sintered group demonstrated mean shear bond strength values (41.2 ±6.3 MPa), which were significantly higher (P<.001) than those of the pressed group (21.3 ±4.3 MPa). Conclusions Sintering of computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) lithium disilicate ceramic achieved higher shear bond strength values than pressing fluorapatite glass-ceramic to zirconia substructure material.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)221-227
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Volume118
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2017

Fingerprint

Shear Strength
Ceramics
Computer-Aided Design
Waxes
zirconium oxide
Electron Scanning Microscopy
Glass ceramics
Students

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oral Surgery

Cite this

Shear bond strength of zirconia-based ceramics veneered with 2 different techniques. / Zaher, Ahmed Morsy Elsayed; Hochstedler, J. L.; Rueggeberg, Frederick; Kee, Edwin L.

In: Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, Vol. 118, No. 2, 01.08.2017, p. 221-227.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{535e54f027ea4362ba823c21a34be749,
title = "Shear bond strength of zirconia-based ceramics veneered with 2 different techniques",
abstract = "Statement of problem Delamination of veneering ceramic is reported as one of the most frequent problems associated with veneered zirconia restorations. Purpose The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the shear bond strength of sintered lithium disilicate to that of pressed fluorapatite glass-ceramic on a zirconia substrate. Material and methods Thirty zirconia blocks (20×15×2.5-mm thick) were cut, sintered, and divided into 2 groups. A pressed group, a zirconia liner, was applied and sintered, and the lost-wax technique was used to fabricate fluorapatite glass-ceramic blocks (3×3×3 mm), which were pressed onto the sintered zirconia blocks. A sintered group, lithium disilicate blocks, were cut (3×3×3 mm) and sintered to the sintered zirconia blocks by using a low-fusing glass-ceramic. The thickness of the low-fusing glass-ceramic was standardized to approximately 80 μm prior to sintering. The shear bond strength levels of the specimens were tested using a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min until failure. Representative separated specimen surfaces were examined for fracture characteristics, using scanning electron microscopy at ×50 magnification. Debonding data were compared using a 2-tailed, unpaired Student t test (α=.05). Results The sintered group demonstrated mean shear bond strength values (41.2 ±6.3 MPa), which were significantly higher (P<.001) than those of the pressed group (21.3 ±4.3 MPa). Conclusions Sintering of computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) lithium disilicate ceramic achieved higher shear bond strength values than pressing fluorapatite glass-ceramic to zirconia substructure material.",
author = "Zaher, {Ahmed Morsy Elsayed} and Hochstedler, {J. L.} and Frederick Rueggeberg and Kee, {Edwin L.}",
year = "2017",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.11.016",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "118",
pages = "221--227",
journal = "Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry",
issn = "0022-3913",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Shear bond strength of zirconia-based ceramics veneered with 2 different techniques

AU - Zaher, Ahmed Morsy Elsayed

AU - Hochstedler, J. L.

AU - Rueggeberg, Frederick

AU - Kee, Edwin L.

PY - 2017/8/1

Y1 - 2017/8/1

N2 - Statement of problem Delamination of veneering ceramic is reported as one of the most frequent problems associated with veneered zirconia restorations. Purpose The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the shear bond strength of sintered lithium disilicate to that of pressed fluorapatite glass-ceramic on a zirconia substrate. Material and methods Thirty zirconia blocks (20×15×2.5-mm thick) were cut, sintered, and divided into 2 groups. A pressed group, a zirconia liner, was applied and sintered, and the lost-wax technique was used to fabricate fluorapatite glass-ceramic blocks (3×3×3 mm), which were pressed onto the sintered zirconia blocks. A sintered group, lithium disilicate blocks, were cut (3×3×3 mm) and sintered to the sintered zirconia blocks by using a low-fusing glass-ceramic. The thickness of the low-fusing glass-ceramic was standardized to approximately 80 μm prior to sintering. The shear bond strength levels of the specimens were tested using a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min until failure. Representative separated specimen surfaces were examined for fracture characteristics, using scanning electron microscopy at ×50 magnification. Debonding data were compared using a 2-tailed, unpaired Student t test (α=.05). Results The sintered group demonstrated mean shear bond strength values (41.2 ±6.3 MPa), which were significantly higher (P<.001) than those of the pressed group (21.3 ±4.3 MPa). Conclusions Sintering of computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) lithium disilicate ceramic achieved higher shear bond strength values than pressing fluorapatite glass-ceramic to zirconia substructure material.

AB - Statement of problem Delamination of veneering ceramic is reported as one of the most frequent problems associated with veneered zirconia restorations. Purpose The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the shear bond strength of sintered lithium disilicate to that of pressed fluorapatite glass-ceramic on a zirconia substrate. Material and methods Thirty zirconia blocks (20×15×2.5-mm thick) were cut, sintered, and divided into 2 groups. A pressed group, a zirconia liner, was applied and sintered, and the lost-wax technique was used to fabricate fluorapatite glass-ceramic blocks (3×3×3 mm), which were pressed onto the sintered zirconia blocks. A sintered group, lithium disilicate blocks, were cut (3×3×3 mm) and sintered to the sintered zirconia blocks by using a low-fusing glass-ceramic. The thickness of the low-fusing glass-ceramic was standardized to approximately 80 μm prior to sintering. The shear bond strength levels of the specimens were tested using a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min until failure. Representative separated specimen surfaces were examined for fracture characteristics, using scanning electron microscopy at ×50 magnification. Debonding data were compared using a 2-tailed, unpaired Student t test (α=.05). Results The sintered group demonstrated mean shear bond strength values (41.2 ±6.3 MPa), which were significantly higher (P<.001) than those of the pressed group (21.3 ±4.3 MPa). Conclusions Sintering of computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) lithium disilicate ceramic achieved higher shear bond strength values than pressing fluorapatite glass-ceramic to zirconia substructure material.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85013212234&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85013212234&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.11.016

DO - 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.11.016

M3 - Article

C2 - 28222866

AN - SCOPUS:85013212234

VL - 118

SP - 221

EP - 227

JO - Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry

JF - Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry

SN - 0022-3913

IS - 2

ER -