Should PGY-1 Be mandatory in dental education? Two viewpoints viewpoint 1

PGY-1 provides benefits that support making it mandatory

Vineet Dhar, Alison Glascoe, Shahrokh Esfandiari, Kelly B. Williams, Michells R. McQuistan, Mark R Stevens

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

This Point/Counterpoint considers whether a general dentistry postgraduate year one (PGY-1) residency should be required for all new graduates who do not pursue specialty training. Currently, New York and Delaware require PGY-l for dental licensure, while other states offer it as an alternative to a clinical examination for obtaining licensure. Viewpoint 1 supports the position that PGY-l should be mandatory by presenting evidence that PGY-l residencies fulfill new graduates' need for additional clinical training, enhance their professionalism and practice management skills, and improve access to care. The authors also discuss two barriers - the limited number of postdoctoral positions and the high cost - and suggest ways to overcome them. In contrast, Viewpoint 2 opposes mandatory PGY-l training. While these authors consider the same core concepts as Viewpoint 1 (education and access to care), they present alternative methods for addressing perceived educational shortcomings in predoctoral curricula. They also examine the competing needs of underserved populations and residents and the resulting impact on access to care, and they discuss the potential conflict of interest associated with asking PGY-1 program directors to assess their residents' competence for licensure.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1273-1281
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of dental education
Volume80
Issue number11
StatePublished - Nov 1 2016

Fingerprint

Dental Education
Licensure
Internship and Residency
Dental Licensure
Conflict of Interest
Practice Management
Vulnerable Populations
Dentistry
graduate
Curriculum
Mental Competency
resident
education
dentistry
conflict of interest
Education
Costs and Cost Analysis
director
curriculum
examination

Keywords

  • Access to health care
  • Advanced dental education
  • Graduate dental education
  • Licensure
  • Postdoctoral general dentistry

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

Should PGY-1 Be mandatory in dental education? Two viewpoints viewpoint 1 : PGY-1 provides benefits that support making it mandatory. / Dhar, Vineet; Glascoe, Alison; Esfandiari, Shahrokh; Williams, Kelly B.; McQuistan, Michells R.; Stevens, Mark R.

In: Journal of dental education, Vol. 80, No. 11, 01.11.2016, p. 1273-1281.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Dhar, Vineet ; Glascoe, Alison ; Esfandiari, Shahrokh ; Williams, Kelly B. ; McQuistan, Michells R. ; Stevens, Mark R. / Should PGY-1 Be mandatory in dental education? Two viewpoints viewpoint 1 : PGY-1 provides benefits that support making it mandatory. In: Journal of dental education. 2016 ; Vol. 80, No. 11. pp. 1273-1281.
@article{53926a0f5de44a59b9f260600638a281,
title = "Should PGY-1 Be mandatory in dental education? Two viewpoints viewpoint 1: PGY-1 provides benefits that support making it mandatory",
abstract = "This Point/Counterpoint considers whether a general dentistry postgraduate year one (PGY-1) residency should be required for all new graduates who do not pursue specialty training. Currently, New York and Delaware require PGY-l for dental licensure, while other states offer it as an alternative to a clinical examination for obtaining licensure. Viewpoint 1 supports the position that PGY-l should be mandatory by presenting evidence that PGY-l residencies fulfill new graduates' need for additional clinical training, enhance their professionalism and practice management skills, and improve access to care. The authors also discuss two barriers - the limited number of postdoctoral positions and the high cost - and suggest ways to overcome them. In contrast, Viewpoint 2 opposes mandatory PGY-l training. While these authors consider the same core concepts as Viewpoint 1 (education and access to care), they present alternative methods for addressing perceived educational shortcomings in predoctoral curricula. They also examine the competing needs of underserved populations and residents and the resulting impact on access to care, and they discuss the potential conflict of interest associated with asking PGY-1 program directors to assess their residents' competence for licensure.",
keywords = "Access to health care, Advanced dental education, Graduate dental education, Licensure, Postdoctoral general dentistry",
author = "Vineet Dhar and Alison Glascoe and Shahrokh Esfandiari and Williams, {Kelly B.} and McQuistan, {Michells R.} and Stevens, {Mark R}",
year = "2016",
month = "11",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "80",
pages = "1273--1281",
journal = "Journal of Dental Education",
issn = "0022-0337",
publisher = "American Dental Education Association",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Should PGY-1 Be mandatory in dental education? Two viewpoints viewpoint 1

T2 - PGY-1 provides benefits that support making it mandatory

AU - Dhar, Vineet

AU - Glascoe, Alison

AU - Esfandiari, Shahrokh

AU - Williams, Kelly B.

AU - McQuistan, Michells R.

AU - Stevens, Mark R

PY - 2016/11/1

Y1 - 2016/11/1

N2 - This Point/Counterpoint considers whether a general dentistry postgraduate year one (PGY-1) residency should be required for all new graduates who do not pursue specialty training. Currently, New York and Delaware require PGY-l for dental licensure, while other states offer it as an alternative to a clinical examination for obtaining licensure. Viewpoint 1 supports the position that PGY-l should be mandatory by presenting evidence that PGY-l residencies fulfill new graduates' need for additional clinical training, enhance their professionalism and practice management skills, and improve access to care. The authors also discuss two barriers - the limited number of postdoctoral positions and the high cost - and suggest ways to overcome them. In contrast, Viewpoint 2 opposes mandatory PGY-l training. While these authors consider the same core concepts as Viewpoint 1 (education and access to care), they present alternative methods for addressing perceived educational shortcomings in predoctoral curricula. They also examine the competing needs of underserved populations and residents and the resulting impact on access to care, and they discuss the potential conflict of interest associated with asking PGY-1 program directors to assess their residents' competence for licensure.

AB - This Point/Counterpoint considers whether a general dentistry postgraduate year one (PGY-1) residency should be required for all new graduates who do not pursue specialty training. Currently, New York and Delaware require PGY-l for dental licensure, while other states offer it as an alternative to a clinical examination for obtaining licensure. Viewpoint 1 supports the position that PGY-l should be mandatory by presenting evidence that PGY-l residencies fulfill new graduates' need for additional clinical training, enhance their professionalism and practice management skills, and improve access to care. The authors also discuss two barriers - the limited number of postdoctoral positions and the high cost - and suggest ways to overcome them. In contrast, Viewpoint 2 opposes mandatory PGY-l training. While these authors consider the same core concepts as Viewpoint 1 (education and access to care), they present alternative methods for addressing perceived educational shortcomings in predoctoral curricula. They also examine the competing needs of underserved populations and residents and the resulting impact on access to care, and they discuss the potential conflict of interest associated with asking PGY-1 program directors to assess their residents' competence for licensure.

KW - Access to health care

KW - Advanced dental education

KW - Graduate dental education

KW - Licensure

KW - Postdoctoral general dentistry

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85016439722&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85016439722&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 80

SP - 1273

EP - 1281

JO - Journal of Dental Education

JF - Journal of Dental Education

SN - 0022-0337

IS - 11

ER -