Skin tests in comparison with other diagnostic methods

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In general there are high correlations between positive results to properly performed epicutaneous skin tests and the results of eye, nose, or lung challenges with the homologous allergen. The results of epicutaneous skin tests are also highly correlated with the results of in vitro tests and clinical histories. These correlations between the tests and challenges are highest when potent, well-characterized allergen extracts are used. For most common allergens, the results of intracutaneous skin testing add little if anything to correlations between skin test results and the results of challenges or to predicting clinical histories. The extra sensitivity of intracutaneous skin tests may be valuable when high potency extracts are not available or when the risk of a falsely negative test is high, as with drug or insect venom allergies; however, this commonly stated assumption rarely has been examined critically. All physicians caring for patients with histories suggestive of allergic disorders must be keenly aware of the strengths and limitations of all available testing methods.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)355-367
Number of pages13
JournalImmunology and Allergy Clinics of North America
Volume21
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2001

Fingerprint

Skin Tests
Allergens
Venoms
Nose
Insects
Hypersensitivity
Physicians
Lung
Skin
Pharmaceutical Preparations

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Immunology and Allergy
  • Immunology

Cite this

Skin tests in comparison with other diagnostic methods. / Ownby, Dennis Randall.

In: Immunology and Allergy Clinics of North America, Vol. 21, No. 2, 01.01.2001, p. 355-367.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c3fb34d1ccf34202b36a8c01597c8a35,
title = "Skin tests in comparison with other diagnostic methods",
abstract = "In general there are high correlations between positive results to properly performed epicutaneous skin tests and the results of eye, nose, or lung challenges with the homologous allergen. The results of epicutaneous skin tests are also highly correlated with the results of in vitro tests and clinical histories. These correlations between the tests and challenges are highest when potent, well-characterized allergen extracts are used. For most common allergens, the results of intracutaneous skin testing add little if anything to correlations between skin test results and the results of challenges or to predicting clinical histories. The extra sensitivity of intracutaneous skin tests may be valuable when high potency extracts are not available or when the risk of a falsely negative test is high, as with drug or insect venom allergies; however, this commonly stated assumption rarely has been examined critically. All physicians caring for patients with histories suggestive of allergic disorders must be keenly aware of the strengths and limitations of all available testing methods.",
author = "Ownby, {Dennis Randall}",
year = "2001",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/S0889-8561(05)70211-3",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "355--367",
journal = "Immunology and Allergy Clinics of North America",
issn = "0889-8561",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Skin tests in comparison with other diagnostic methods

AU - Ownby, Dennis Randall

PY - 2001/1/1

Y1 - 2001/1/1

N2 - In general there are high correlations between positive results to properly performed epicutaneous skin tests and the results of eye, nose, or lung challenges with the homologous allergen. The results of epicutaneous skin tests are also highly correlated with the results of in vitro tests and clinical histories. These correlations between the tests and challenges are highest when potent, well-characterized allergen extracts are used. For most common allergens, the results of intracutaneous skin testing add little if anything to correlations between skin test results and the results of challenges or to predicting clinical histories. The extra sensitivity of intracutaneous skin tests may be valuable when high potency extracts are not available or when the risk of a falsely negative test is high, as with drug or insect venom allergies; however, this commonly stated assumption rarely has been examined critically. All physicians caring for patients with histories suggestive of allergic disorders must be keenly aware of the strengths and limitations of all available testing methods.

AB - In general there are high correlations between positive results to properly performed epicutaneous skin tests and the results of eye, nose, or lung challenges with the homologous allergen. The results of epicutaneous skin tests are also highly correlated with the results of in vitro tests and clinical histories. These correlations between the tests and challenges are highest when potent, well-characterized allergen extracts are used. For most common allergens, the results of intracutaneous skin testing add little if anything to correlations between skin test results and the results of challenges or to predicting clinical histories. The extra sensitivity of intracutaneous skin tests may be valuable when high potency extracts are not available or when the risk of a falsely negative test is high, as with drug or insect venom allergies; however, this commonly stated assumption rarely has been examined critically. All physicians caring for patients with histories suggestive of allergic disorders must be keenly aware of the strengths and limitations of all available testing methods.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034967352&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034967352&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0889-8561(05)70211-3

DO - 10.1016/S0889-8561(05)70211-3

M3 - Article

VL - 21

SP - 355

EP - 367

JO - Immunology and Allergy Clinics of North America

JF - Immunology and Allergy Clinics of North America

SN - 0889-8561

IS - 2

ER -