Small transrectal ultrasound volume predicts clinically significant Gleason score upgrading after radical prostatectomy

Results from the SEARCH database

Ryan S. Turley, Robert J. Hamilton, Martha Kennedy Terris, Christopher J. Kane, William J. Aronson, Joseph C. Presti, Christopher L. Amling, Stephen J. Freedland

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

48 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: Needle biopsy Gleason scores are often upgraded after pathological examination of the prostate following radical prostatectomy. It has been suggested that larger prostates would be associated with a greater risk of upgrading since a smaller percentage of the gland is sampled and, thus, the highest grade disease would more likely be missed, assuming an equal number of cores is taken from similar locations. We examined the likelihood of clinically relevant upgrading after radical prostatectomy as a function of transrectal ultrasound volume. Materials and Methods: We examined the association between transrectal ultrasound volume and upgrading (higher Gleason score category in the radical prostatectomy specimen than in the biopsy) in 586 men treated with radical prostatectomy between 1995 and 2006 in the SEARCH database who underwent at least a sextant biopsy using multivariate logistic regression. Transrectal ultrasound volume was categorized as 20 or less (in 71), 21 to 40 (in 334), 41 to 60 (in 123) and greater than 60 cm3 (in 58). Gleason score was examined as a categorical variable of 2-6, 3 + 4 and 4 + 3 or greater. Results: Overall 138 cases (24%) were upgraded, 80 (14%) were downgraded, and 368 (62%) had identical biopsy and pathological Gleason sum groups. Larger transrectal ultrasound volume was significantly associated with decreased likelihood of upgrading (p trend <0.001). For transrectal ultrasound volumes greater than 60, 41 to 60, 21 to 40 and 20 cm3 or less, the estimated multivariate adjusted probability of upgrading was 12.6%, 27.5%, 36.4% and 45.5% for Gleason 2-6 tumors, and 6.1%, 8.5%, 18.9% and 20.9% for Gleason 3+4 tumors, respectively. Conclusions: Larger transrectal ultrasound volumes were at decreased risk for clinically significant upgrading after radical prostatectomy. This fact should be kept in mind when deciding on treatment decisions for men with apparently low grade prostate cancer on biopsy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)523-528
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Urology
Volume179
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2008

Fingerprint

Neoplasm Grading
Prostatectomy
Databases
Biopsy
Prostate
Needle Biopsy
Neoplasms
Prostatic Neoplasms
Logistic Models

Keywords

  • Biopsy, needle
  • Prostate
  • Prostatectomy
  • Prostatic neoplasms

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

Small transrectal ultrasound volume predicts clinically significant Gleason score upgrading after radical prostatectomy : Results from the SEARCH database. / Turley, Ryan S.; Hamilton, Robert J.; Terris, Martha Kennedy; Kane, Christopher J.; Aronson, William J.; Presti, Joseph C.; Amling, Christopher L.; Freedland, Stephen J.

In: Journal of Urology, Vol. 179, No. 2, 01.01.2008, p. 523-528.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Turley, Ryan S. ; Hamilton, Robert J. ; Terris, Martha Kennedy ; Kane, Christopher J. ; Aronson, William J. ; Presti, Joseph C. ; Amling, Christopher L. ; Freedland, Stephen J. / Small transrectal ultrasound volume predicts clinically significant Gleason score upgrading after radical prostatectomy : Results from the SEARCH database. In: Journal of Urology. 2008 ; Vol. 179, No. 2. pp. 523-528.
@article{9581cb9bff7d498e87b97502b24febd7,
title = "Small transrectal ultrasound volume predicts clinically significant Gleason score upgrading after radical prostatectomy: Results from the SEARCH database",
abstract = "Purpose: Needle biopsy Gleason scores are often upgraded after pathological examination of the prostate following radical prostatectomy. It has been suggested that larger prostates would be associated with a greater risk of upgrading since a smaller percentage of the gland is sampled and, thus, the highest grade disease would more likely be missed, assuming an equal number of cores is taken from similar locations. We examined the likelihood of clinically relevant upgrading after radical prostatectomy as a function of transrectal ultrasound volume. Materials and Methods: We examined the association between transrectal ultrasound volume and upgrading (higher Gleason score category in the radical prostatectomy specimen than in the biopsy) in 586 men treated with radical prostatectomy between 1995 and 2006 in the SEARCH database who underwent at least a sextant biopsy using multivariate logistic regression. Transrectal ultrasound volume was categorized as 20 or less (in 71), 21 to 40 (in 334), 41 to 60 (in 123) and greater than 60 cm3 (in 58). Gleason score was examined as a categorical variable of 2-6, 3 + 4 and 4 + 3 or greater. Results: Overall 138 cases (24{\%}) were upgraded, 80 (14{\%}) were downgraded, and 368 (62{\%}) had identical biopsy and pathological Gleason sum groups. Larger transrectal ultrasound volume was significantly associated with decreased likelihood of upgrading (p trend <0.001). For transrectal ultrasound volumes greater than 60, 41 to 60, 21 to 40 and 20 cm3 or less, the estimated multivariate adjusted probability of upgrading was 12.6{\%}, 27.5{\%}, 36.4{\%} and 45.5{\%} for Gleason 2-6 tumors, and 6.1{\%}, 8.5{\%}, 18.9{\%} and 20.9{\%} for Gleason 3+4 tumors, respectively. Conclusions: Larger transrectal ultrasound volumes were at decreased risk for clinically significant upgrading after radical prostatectomy. This fact should be kept in mind when deciding on treatment decisions for men with apparently low grade prostate cancer on biopsy.",
keywords = "Biopsy, needle, Prostate, Prostatectomy, Prostatic neoplasms",
author = "Turley, {Ryan S.} and Hamilton, {Robert J.} and Terris, {Martha Kennedy} and Kane, {Christopher J.} and Aronson, {William J.} and Presti, {Joseph C.} and Amling, {Christopher L.} and Freedland, {Stephen J.}",
year = "2008",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.juro.2007.09.078",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "179",
pages = "523--528",
journal = "Journal of Urology",
issn = "0022-5347",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Small transrectal ultrasound volume predicts clinically significant Gleason score upgrading after radical prostatectomy

T2 - Results from the SEARCH database

AU - Turley, Ryan S.

AU - Hamilton, Robert J.

AU - Terris, Martha Kennedy

AU - Kane, Christopher J.

AU - Aronson, William J.

AU - Presti, Joseph C.

AU - Amling, Christopher L.

AU - Freedland, Stephen J.

PY - 2008/1/1

Y1 - 2008/1/1

N2 - Purpose: Needle biopsy Gleason scores are often upgraded after pathological examination of the prostate following radical prostatectomy. It has been suggested that larger prostates would be associated with a greater risk of upgrading since a smaller percentage of the gland is sampled and, thus, the highest grade disease would more likely be missed, assuming an equal number of cores is taken from similar locations. We examined the likelihood of clinically relevant upgrading after radical prostatectomy as a function of transrectal ultrasound volume. Materials and Methods: We examined the association between transrectal ultrasound volume and upgrading (higher Gleason score category in the radical prostatectomy specimen than in the biopsy) in 586 men treated with radical prostatectomy between 1995 and 2006 in the SEARCH database who underwent at least a sextant biopsy using multivariate logistic regression. Transrectal ultrasound volume was categorized as 20 or less (in 71), 21 to 40 (in 334), 41 to 60 (in 123) and greater than 60 cm3 (in 58). Gleason score was examined as a categorical variable of 2-6, 3 + 4 and 4 + 3 or greater. Results: Overall 138 cases (24%) were upgraded, 80 (14%) were downgraded, and 368 (62%) had identical biopsy and pathological Gleason sum groups. Larger transrectal ultrasound volume was significantly associated with decreased likelihood of upgrading (p trend <0.001). For transrectal ultrasound volumes greater than 60, 41 to 60, 21 to 40 and 20 cm3 or less, the estimated multivariate adjusted probability of upgrading was 12.6%, 27.5%, 36.4% and 45.5% for Gleason 2-6 tumors, and 6.1%, 8.5%, 18.9% and 20.9% for Gleason 3+4 tumors, respectively. Conclusions: Larger transrectal ultrasound volumes were at decreased risk for clinically significant upgrading after radical prostatectomy. This fact should be kept in mind when deciding on treatment decisions for men with apparently low grade prostate cancer on biopsy.

AB - Purpose: Needle biopsy Gleason scores are often upgraded after pathological examination of the prostate following radical prostatectomy. It has been suggested that larger prostates would be associated with a greater risk of upgrading since a smaller percentage of the gland is sampled and, thus, the highest grade disease would more likely be missed, assuming an equal number of cores is taken from similar locations. We examined the likelihood of clinically relevant upgrading after radical prostatectomy as a function of transrectal ultrasound volume. Materials and Methods: We examined the association between transrectal ultrasound volume and upgrading (higher Gleason score category in the radical prostatectomy specimen than in the biopsy) in 586 men treated with radical prostatectomy between 1995 and 2006 in the SEARCH database who underwent at least a sextant biopsy using multivariate logistic regression. Transrectal ultrasound volume was categorized as 20 or less (in 71), 21 to 40 (in 334), 41 to 60 (in 123) and greater than 60 cm3 (in 58). Gleason score was examined as a categorical variable of 2-6, 3 + 4 and 4 + 3 or greater. Results: Overall 138 cases (24%) were upgraded, 80 (14%) were downgraded, and 368 (62%) had identical biopsy and pathological Gleason sum groups. Larger transrectal ultrasound volume was significantly associated with decreased likelihood of upgrading (p trend <0.001). For transrectal ultrasound volumes greater than 60, 41 to 60, 21 to 40 and 20 cm3 or less, the estimated multivariate adjusted probability of upgrading was 12.6%, 27.5%, 36.4% and 45.5% for Gleason 2-6 tumors, and 6.1%, 8.5%, 18.9% and 20.9% for Gleason 3+4 tumors, respectively. Conclusions: Larger transrectal ultrasound volumes were at decreased risk for clinically significant upgrading after radical prostatectomy. This fact should be kept in mind when deciding on treatment decisions for men with apparently low grade prostate cancer on biopsy.

KW - Biopsy, needle

KW - Prostate

KW - Prostatectomy

KW - Prostatic neoplasms

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=38849112802&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=38849112802&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.juro.2007.09.078

DO - 10.1016/j.juro.2007.09.078

M3 - Article

VL - 179

SP - 523

EP - 528

JO - Journal of Urology

JF - Journal of Urology

SN - 0022-5347

IS - 2

ER -