Social sanction and threat explanations of gender effects on direct and indirect aggression

Deborah Ruth Richardson, Laura R. Green

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

76 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The present study examined two explanations for gender differences in expression of direct and indirect aggression. The social sanction model suggests that aggressor and target gender effects may be accounted for in terms of social sanctions against behaving aggressively; indirect aggression is the likely outcome of inhibitions against expression of direct aggression. The threat argument suggests that high levels of direct aggression in male-male dyads as well as apparent inhibitions against harming females might be accounted for by the fact that males are more threatening targets than are females. Research participants completed a questionnaire measure of direct and indirect aggression twice, once with reference to their behavior toward a same-gender target and once with reference to their behavior toward an other-gender target. Although most direct aggression was reported by male aggressors toward male targets, gender of target did not relate to indirect aggression. Males reported approximately equal levels of indirect and direct aggression. Although females reported using more indirect than direct aggression, they did not differ from males in their reports of the frequency of use of indirect aggression. These results provided some support for both models of gender effects on human aggression and suggest the appropriateness of a relatively complex model of gender effects on aggression. Aggr. Behav. 25:425-434, 1999.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)425-434
Number of pages10
JournalAggressive Behavior
Volume25
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 1999

Fingerprint

Aggression
Sanctions
Threat

Keywords

  • Gender
  • Indirect aggression
  • Social sanction
  • Threat

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Social sanction and threat explanations of gender effects on direct and indirect aggression. / Richardson, Deborah Ruth; Green, Laura R.

In: Aggressive Behavior, Vol. 25, No. 6, 01.12.1999, p. 425-434.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{3ca1656aa2ae472e8bf3a648404dfab4,
title = "Social sanction and threat explanations of gender effects on direct and indirect aggression",
abstract = "The present study examined two explanations for gender differences in expression of direct and indirect aggression. The social sanction model suggests that aggressor and target gender effects may be accounted for in terms of social sanctions against behaving aggressively; indirect aggression is the likely outcome of inhibitions against expression of direct aggression. The threat argument suggests that high levels of direct aggression in male-male dyads as well as apparent inhibitions against harming females might be accounted for by the fact that males are more threatening targets than are females. Research participants completed a questionnaire measure of direct and indirect aggression twice, once with reference to their behavior toward a same-gender target and once with reference to their behavior toward an other-gender target. Although most direct aggression was reported by male aggressors toward male targets, gender of target did not relate to indirect aggression. Males reported approximately equal levels of indirect and direct aggression. Although females reported using more indirect than direct aggression, they did not differ from males in their reports of the frequency of use of indirect aggression. These results provided some support for both models of gender effects on human aggression and suggest the appropriateness of a relatively complex model of gender effects on aggression. Aggr. Behav. 25:425-434, 1999.",
keywords = "Gender, Indirect aggression, Social sanction, Threat",
author = "Richardson, {Deborah Ruth} and Green, {Laura R.}",
year = "1999",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/(SICI)1098-2337(1999)25:6<425::AID-AB3>3.0.CO;2-W",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "25",
pages = "425--434",
journal = "Aggressive Behavior",
issn = "0096-140X",
publisher = "Wiley-Liss Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Social sanction and threat explanations of gender effects on direct and indirect aggression

AU - Richardson, Deborah Ruth

AU - Green, Laura R.

PY - 1999/12/1

Y1 - 1999/12/1

N2 - The present study examined two explanations for gender differences in expression of direct and indirect aggression. The social sanction model suggests that aggressor and target gender effects may be accounted for in terms of social sanctions against behaving aggressively; indirect aggression is the likely outcome of inhibitions against expression of direct aggression. The threat argument suggests that high levels of direct aggression in male-male dyads as well as apparent inhibitions against harming females might be accounted for by the fact that males are more threatening targets than are females. Research participants completed a questionnaire measure of direct and indirect aggression twice, once with reference to their behavior toward a same-gender target and once with reference to their behavior toward an other-gender target. Although most direct aggression was reported by male aggressors toward male targets, gender of target did not relate to indirect aggression. Males reported approximately equal levels of indirect and direct aggression. Although females reported using more indirect than direct aggression, they did not differ from males in their reports of the frequency of use of indirect aggression. These results provided some support for both models of gender effects on human aggression and suggest the appropriateness of a relatively complex model of gender effects on aggression. Aggr. Behav. 25:425-434, 1999.

AB - The present study examined two explanations for gender differences in expression of direct and indirect aggression. The social sanction model suggests that aggressor and target gender effects may be accounted for in terms of social sanctions against behaving aggressively; indirect aggression is the likely outcome of inhibitions against expression of direct aggression. The threat argument suggests that high levels of direct aggression in male-male dyads as well as apparent inhibitions against harming females might be accounted for by the fact that males are more threatening targets than are females. Research participants completed a questionnaire measure of direct and indirect aggression twice, once with reference to their behavior toward a same-gender target and once with reference to their behavior toward an other-gender target. Although most direct aggression was reported by male aggressors toward male targets, gender of target did not relate to indirect aggression. Males reported approximately equal levels of indirect and direct aggression. Although females reported using more indirect than direct aggression, they did not differ from males in their reports of the frequency of use of indirect aggression. These results provided some support for both models of gender effects on human aggression and suggest the appropriateness of a relatively complex model of gender effects on aggression. Aggr. Behav. 25:425-434, 1999.

KW - Gender

KW - Indirect aggression

KW - Social sanction

KW - Threat

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033248037&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033248037&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2337(1999)25:6<425::AID-AB3>3.0.CO;2-W

DO - 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2337(1999)25:6<425::AID-AB3>3.0.CO;2-W

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0033248037

VL - 25

SP - 425

EP - 434

JO - Aggressive Behavior

JF - Aggressive Behavior

SN - 0096-140X

IS - 6

ER -