State primary stroke center policies in the United States: Rural health issues

Catherine P. Slade, Laurence J. O'Toole, Eunju Rho

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    4 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Objective: To explore the relationship between state primary stroke center (PSC) designation policy implementation and access to optimal stroke care for residents of rural areas. Materials and Methods: Primary data were collected during the period September 2008-August 2009. Following content analysis of state PSC policies, four case study states were selected for fieldwork, in part for state rural healthcare access challenges. Variables included the barriers and facilitators to PSC designation policy implementation. More than 100 semistructured stakeholder interviews were conducted by teams of researchers. Large-group meetings were also observed. Interview summaries were reviewed by stakeholders for accuracy and completeness. Results: The consistent finding in all study states was that PSC designation and state policy implementation in rural areas are unlikely for a variety of reasons, including lack of financial resources for telemedicine, difficulty maintaining neurology coverage, and emergency departments unable to administer thrombolytics. Findings indicate recognition by states about the need for stroke-care public policy specific to telemedicine in rural areas. Conclusions: Although state PSC designation policies raise awareness of rural issues, designation policy alone cannot overcome the obstacle of rural access to optimal stroke care. States must be technology-ready, and providers need to embrace e-health and telemedicine to ensure coordination of care for stroke victims in rural areas. More important is that state policy makers should provide rules and regulations to encourage PSC hospitals to use telemedicine and "proxy credentialing" to support their affiliated rural facilities.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)225-229
    Number of pages5
    JournalTelemedicine and e-Health
    Volume18
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Apr 1 2012

    Fingerprint

    Rural Health
    Stroke
    Telemedicine
    Interviews
    Credentialing
    Group Processes
    Proxy
    Public Policy
    Neurology
    Administrative Personnel
    Hospital Emergency Service
    Research Personnel
    Technology
    Delivery of Health Care

    Keywords

    • policy
    • technology
    • telemedicine

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Medicine(all)
    • Health Informatics
    • Health Information Management

    Cite this

    State primary stroke center policies in the United States : Rural health issues. / Slade, Catherine P.; O'Toole, Laurence J.; Rho, Eunju.

    In: Telemedicine and e-Health, Vol. 18, No. 3, 01.04.2012, p. 225-229.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Slade, Catherine P. ; O'Toole, Laurence J. ; Rho, Eunju. / State primary stroke center policies in the United States : Rural health issues. In: Telemedicine and e-Health. 2012 ; Vol. 18, No. 3. pp. 225-229.
    @article{167800459ac547e58eec89844c6726c9,
    title = "State primary stroke center policies in the United States: Rural health issues",
    abstract = "Objective: To explore the relationship between state primary stroke center (PSC) designation policy implementation and access to optimal stroke care for residents of rural areas. Materials and Methods: Primary data were collected during the period September 2008-August 2009. Following content analysis of state PSC policies, four case study states were selected for fieldwork, in part for state rural healthcare access challenges. Variables included the barriers and facilitators to PSC designation policy implementation. More than 100 semistructured stakeholder interviews were conducted by teams of researchers. Large-group meetings were also observed. Interview summaries were reviewed by stakeholders for accuracy and completeness. Results: The consistent finding in all study states was that PSC designation and state policy implementation in rural areas are unlikely for a variety of reasons, including lack of financial resources for telemedicine, difficulty maintaining neurology coverage, and emergency departments unable to administer thrombolytics. Findings indicate recognition by states about the need for stroke-care public policy specific to telemedicine in rural areas. Conclusions: Although state PSC designation policies raise awareness of rural issues, designation policy alone cannot overcome the obstacle of rural access to optimal stroke care. States must be technology-ready, and providers need to embrace e-health and telemedicine to ensure coordination of care for stroke victims in rural areas. More important is that state policy makers should provide rules and regulations to encourage PSC hospitals to use telemedicine and {"}proxy credentialing{"} to support their affiliated rural facilities.",
    keywords = "policy, technology, telemedicine",
    author = "Slade, {Catherine P.} and O'Toole, {Laurence J.} and Eunju Rho",
    year = "2012",
    month = "4",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1089/tmj.2011.0141",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "18",
    pages = "225--229",
    journal = "Telemedicine and e-Health",
    issn = "1530-5627",
    publisher = "Mary Ann Liebert Inc.",
    number = "3",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - State primary stroke center policies in the United States

    T2 - Rural health issues

    AU - Slade, Catherine P.

    AU - O'Toole, Laurence J.

    AU - Rho, Eunju

    PY - 2012/4/1

    Y1 - 2012/4/1

    N2 - Objective: To explore the relationship between state primary stroke center (PSC) designation policy implementation and access to optimal stroke care for residents of rural areas. Materials and Methods: Primary data were collected during the period September 2008-August 2009. Following content analysis of state PSC policies, four case study states were selected for fieldwork, in part for state rural healthcare access challenges. Variables included the barriers and facilitators to PSC designation policy implementation. More than 100 semistructured stakeholder interviews were conducted by teams of researchers. Large-group meetings were also observed. Interview summaries were reviewed by stakeholders for accuracy and completeness. Results: The consistent finding in all study states was that PSC designation and state policy implementation in rural areas are unlikely for a variety of reasons, including lack of financial resources for telemedicine, difficulty maintaining neurology coverage, and emergency departments unable to administer thrombolytics. Findings indicate recognition by states about the need for stroke-care public policy specific to telemedicine in rural areas. Conclusions: Although state PSC designation policies raise awareness of rural issues, designation policy alone cannot overcome the obstacle of rural access to optimal stroke care. States must be technology-ready, and providers need to embrace e-health and telemedicine to ensure coordination of care for stroke victims in rural areas. More important is that state policy makers should provide rules and regulations to encourage PSC hospitals to use telemedicine and "proxy credentialing" to support their affiliated rural facilities.

    AB - Objective: To explore the relationship between state primary stroke center (PSC) designation policy implementation and access to optimal stroke care for residents of rural areas. Materials and Methods: Primary data were collected during the period September 2008-August 2009. Following content analysis of state PSC policies, four case study states were selected for fieldwork, in part for state rural healthcare access challenges. Variables included the barriers and facilitators to PSC designation policy implementation. More than 100 semistructured stakeholder interviews were conducted by teams of researchers. Large-group meetings were also observed. Interview summaries were reviewed by stakeholders for accuracy and completeness. Results: The consistent finding in all study states was that PSC designation and state policy implementation in rural areas are unlikely for a variety of reasons, including lack of financial resources for telemedicine, difficulty maintaining neurology coverage, and emergency departments unable to administer thrombolytics. Findings indicate recognition by states about the need for stroke-care public policy specific to telemedicine in rural areas. Conclusions: Although state PSC designation policies raise awareness of rural issues, designation policy alone cannot overcome the obstacle of rural access to optimal stroke care. States must be technology-ready, and providers need to embrace e-health and telemedicine to ensure coordination of care for stroke victims in rural areas. More important is that state policy makers should provide rules and regulations to encourage PSC hospitals to use telemedicine and "proxy credentialing" to support their affiliated rural facilities.

    KW - policy

    KW - technology

    KW - telemedicine

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84859541776&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84859541776&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1089/tmj.2011.0141

    DO - 10.1089/tmj.2011.0141

    M3 - Article

    C2 - 22356528

    AN - SCOPUS:84859541776

    VL - 18

    SP - 225

    EP - 229

    JO - Telemedicine and e-Health

    JF - Telemedicine and e-Health

    SN - 1530-5627

    IS - 3

    ER -