Stimulation of the posterior cord predicts successful infraclavicular block

Harish Lecamwasam, Jim B Mayfield, Laura Rosow, Yuchiao Chang, Christopher Carter, Carl Rosow

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

43 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Infraclavicular (IC) block is often performed by localizing one cord within the brachial plexus sheath and placing all the local anesthetic solution at that location. We hypothesized that posterior cord stimulation would be associated with a greater likelihood of IC block success. We enrolled 369 patients scheduled for surgery to the lower arm or hand in a prospective, nonrandomized observational trial. All underwent IC blocks using a standard technique, and the cord stimulated immediately before drug injection was recorded. Motor and sensory functioning were evaluated 15 min after injection. Compared with stimulation of either the lateral or medial cord, stimulation of the posterior cord was associated with rapid onset of motor block in significantly more nerves, as well as a decreased likelihood of block failure (motor and sensory block inadequate to perform surgery). Failure rates were 5.8% for posterior cord, 28.3% for lateral (P < 0.05), and 15.4% for medial (P < 0.05). The differences were highly significant when adjusted for multiple possible confounders, such as gender, body mass index, location of the incision, and level of training of the individual performing the block (P < 0.001, lateral versus posterior; P = 0.003, medial versus posterior). A low failure rate was also predicted by stimulation of more than one cord simultaneously (P < 0.05). We conclude that injection after locating the posterior cord or multiple cords predicts successful IC block.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1564-1568
Number of pages5
JournalAnesthesia and Analgesia
Volume102
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2006
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Injections
Brachial Plexus
Local Anesthetics
Body Mass Index
Arm
Hand
Pharmaceutical Preparations

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cite this

Stimulation of the posterior cord predicts successful infraclavicular block. / Lecamwasam, Harish; Mayfield, Jim B; Rosow, Laura; Chang, Yuchiao; Carter, Christopher; Rosow, Carl.

In: Anesthesia and Analgesia, Vol. 102, No. 5, 01.01.2006, p. 1564-1568.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lecamwasam, Harish ; Mayfield, Jim B ; Rosow, Laura ; Chang, Yuchiao ; Carter, Christopher ; Rosow, Carl. / Stimulation of the posterior cord predicts successful infraclavicular block. In: Anesthesia and Analgesia. 2006 ; Vol. 102, No. 5. pp. 1564-1568.
@article{8a991355526448b2b146e916579bbb77,
title = "Stimulation of the posterior cord predicts successful infraclavicular block",
abstract = "Infraclavicular (IC) block is often performed by localizing one cord within the brachial plexus sheath and placing all the local anesthetic solution at that location. We hypothesized that posterior cord stimulation would be associated with a greater likelihood of IC block success. We enrolled 369 patients scheduled for surgery to the lower arm or hand in a prospective, nonrandomized observational trial. All underwent IC blocks using a standard technique, and the cord stimulated immediately before drug injection was recorded. Motor and sensory functioning were evaluated 15 min after injection. Compared with stimulation of either the lateral or medial cord, stimulation of the posterior cord was associated with rapid onset of motor block in significantly more nerves, as well as a decreased likelihood of block failure (motor and sensory block inadequate to perform surgery). Failure rates were 5.8{\%} for posterior cord, 28.3{\%} for lateral (P < 0.05), and 15.4{\%} for medial (P < 0.05). The differences were highly significant when adjusted for multiple possible confounders, such as gender, body mass index, location of the incision, and level of training of the individual performing the block (P < 0.001, lateral versus posterior; P = 0.003, medial versus posterior). A low failure rate was also predicted by stimulation of more than one cord simultaneously (P < 0.05). We conclude that injection after locating the posterior cord or multiple cords predicts successful IC block.",
author = "Harish Lecamwasam and Mayfield, {Jim B} and Laura Rosow and Yuchiao Chang and Christopher Carter and Carl Rosow",
year = "2006",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1213/01.ane.0000205750.58424.b2",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "102",
pages = "1564--1568",
journal = "Anesthesia and Analgesia",
issn = "0003-2999",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Stimulation of the posterior cord predicts successful infraclavicular block

AU - Lecamwasam, Harish

AU - Mayfield, Jim B

AU - Rosow, Laura

AU - Chang, Yuchiao

AU - Carter, Christopher

AU - Rosow, Carl

PY - 2006/1/1

Y1 - 2006/1/1

N2 - Infraclavicular (IC) block is often performed by localizing one cord within the brachial plexus sheath and placing all the local anesthetic solution at that location. We hypothesized that posterior cord stimulation would be associated with a greater likelihood of IC block success. We enrolled 369 patients scheduled for surgery to the lower arm or hand in a prospective, nonrandomized observational trial. All underwent IC blocks using a standard technique, and the cord stimulated immediately before drug injection was recorded. Motor and sensory functioning were evaluated 15 min after injection. Compared with stimulation of either the lateral or medial cord, stimulation of the posterior cord was associated with rapid onset of motor block in significantly more nerves, as well as a decreased likelihood of block failure (motor and sensory block inadequate to perform surgery). Failure rates were 5.8% for posterior cord, 28.3% for lateral (P < 0.05), and 15.4% for medial (P < 0.05). The differences were highly significant when adjusted for multiple possible confounders, such as gender, body mass index, location of the incision, and level of training of the individual performing the block (P < 0.001, lateral versus posterior; P = 0.003, medial versus posterior). A low failure rate was also predicted by stimulation of more than one cord simultaneously (P < 0.05). We conclude that injection after locating the posterior cord or multiple cords predicts successful IC block.

AB - Infraclavicular (IC) block is often performed by localizing one cord within the brachial plexus sheath and placing all the local anesthetic solution at that location. We hypothesized that posterior cord stimulation would be associated with a greater likelihood of IC block success. We enrolled 369 patients scheduled for surgery to the lower arm or hand in a prospective, nonrandomized observational trial. All underwent IC blocks using a standard technique, and the cord stimulated immediately before drug injection was recorded. Motor and sensory functioning were evaluated 15 min after injection. Compared with stimulation of either the lateral or medial cord, stimulation of the posterior cord was associated with rapid onset of motor block in significantly more nerves, as well as a decreased likelihood of block failure (motor and sensory block inadequate to perform surgery). Failure rates were 5.8% for posterior cord, 28.3% for lateral (P < 0.05), and 15.4% for medial (P < 0.05). The differences were highly significant when adjusted for multiple possible confounders, such as gender, body mass index, location of the incision, and level of training of the individual performing the block (P < 0.001, lateral versus posterior; P = 0.003, medial versus posterior). A low failure rate was also predicted by stimulation of more than one cord simultaneously (P < 0.05). We conclude that injection after locating the posterior cord or multiple cords predicts successful IC block.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33646186120&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33646186120&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1213/01.ane.0000205750.58424.b2

DO - 10.1213/01.ane.0000205750.58424.b2

M3 - Article

VL - 102

SP - 1564

EP - 1568

JO - Anesthesia and Analgesia

JF - Anesthesia and Analgesia

SN - 0003-2999

IS - 5

ER -