Subcuticular closure versus dermabond: A prospective randomized trial

Erin F Switzer, Robert C. Dinsmore, James H. North

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

38 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

2-Octylcyanoacrylate tissue adhesive (Dermabond™, Ethicon, Inc, Somerville, NJ) is being used successfully for closure of minor lacerations. To date, however, there have been no studies evaluating its use in the operating room for surgical incisions. We conducted a prospective randomized trial to compare the closure of inguinal herniorrhaphy incisions using 2-octylcyanoacrylate tissue adhesive (Dermabond) with closures using 4-0 Monocryl (Ethicon, Inc) in a running subcuticular closure. A total of 46 incisions were randomized at the time of closure. Of these incisions 24 were randomized to Dermabond closure (TA) and 22 were randomized to subcuticular closure (SC). Performance measures included: time for closure, wound complications, and cosmesis. Cosmesis was evaluated by blinded evaluation of photographs of the incisions taken 4 weeks after surgery. Closure times for the TA group were faster than in the SC group (mean of 155 vs 286 seconds; P < 0.001). Wound complications were higher in the TA group (P = 0.045). Cosmesis was also felt to be better in the SC group with a score of 4.2 versus 3.88, but this did not reach statistical significance. Although the use of Dermabond did result in faster wound cultures it also resulted in an increase in wound complications. The difference in mean cosmetic score for each group was not statistically significant but trended toward better scores in the SC group. Based on these findings we do not feel Dermabond is an acceptable alternative to subcuticular suture closure in inguinal herniorrhaphy incisions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)434-436
Number of pages3
JournalAmerican Surgeon
Volume69
Issue number5
StatePublished - Dec 1 2003

Fingerprint

Tissue Adhesives
Groin
Herniorrhaphy
Wounds and Injuries
Lacerations
Operating Rooms
octyl 2-cyanoacrylate
Cosmetics
Sutures
Surgical Wound
glycolide E-caprolactone copolymer

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Subcuticular closure versus dermabond : A prospective randomized trial. / Switzer, Erin F; Dinsmore, Robert C.; North, James H.

In: American Surgeon, Vol. 69, No. 5, 01.12.2003, p. 434-436.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Switzer, EF, Dinsmore, RC & North, JH 2003, 'Subcuticular closure versus dermabond: A prospective randomized trial', American Surgeon, vol. 69, no. 5, pp. 434-436.
Switzer, Erin F ; Dinsmore, Robert C. ; North, James H. / Subcuticular closure versus dermabond : A prospective randomized trial. In: American Surgeon. 2003 ; Vol. 69, No. 5. pp. 434-436.
@article{44fe4952d0044c3993d08f1a881856f3,
title = "Subcuticular closure versus dermabond: A prospective randomized trial",
abstract = "2-Octylcyanoacrylate tissue adhesive (Dermabond™, Ethicon, Inc, Somerville, NJ) is being used successfully for closure of minor lacerations. To date, however, there have been no studies evaluating its use in the operating room for surgical incisions. We conducted a prospective randomized trial to compare the closure of inguinal herniorrhaphy incisions using 2-octylcyanoacrylate tissue adhesive (Dermabond) with closures using 4-0 Monocryl (Ethicon, Inc) in a running subcuticular closure. A total of 46 incisions were randomized at the time of closure. Of these incisions 24 were randomized to Dermabond closure (TA) and 22 were randomized to subcuticular closure (SC). Performance measures included: time for closure, wound complications, and cosmesis. Cosmesis was evaluated by blinded evaluation of photographs of the incisions taken 4 weeks after surgery. Closure times for the TA group were faster than in the SC group (mean of 155 vs 286 seconds; P < 0.001). Wound complications were higher in the TA group (P = 0.045). Cosmesis was also felt to be better in the SC group with a score of 4.2 versus 3.88, but this did not reach statistical significance. Although the use of Dermabond did result in faster wound cultures it also resulted in an increase in wound complications. The difference in mean cosmetic score for each group was not statistically significant but trended toward better scores in the SC group. Based on these findings we do not feel Dermabond is an acceptable alternative to subcuticular suture closure in inguinal herniorrhaphy incisions.",
author = "Switzer, {Erin F} and Dinsmore, {Robert C.} and North, {James H.}",
year = "2003",
month = "12",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "69",
pages = "434--436",
journal = "Handbook of Behavioral Neuroscience",
issn = "0003-1348",
publisher = "JAI Press",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Subcuticular closure versus dermabond

T2 - A prospective randomized trial

AU - Switzer, Erin F

AU - Dinsmore, Robert C.

AU - North, James H.

PY - 2003/12/1

Y1 - 2003/12/1

N2 - 2-Octylcyanoacrylate tissue adhesive (Dermabond™, Ethicon, Inc, Somerville, NJ) is being used successfully for closure of minor lacerations. To date, however, there have been no studies evaluating its use in the operating room for surgical incisions. We conducted a prospective randomized trial to compare the closure of inguinal herniorrhaphy incisions using 2-octylcyanoacrylate tissue adhesive (Dermabond) with closures using 4-0 Monocryl (Ethicon, Inc) in a running subcuticular closure. A total of 46 incisions were randomized at the time of closure. Of these incisions 24 were randomized to Dermabond closure (TA) and 22 were randomized to subcuticular closure (SC). Performance measures included: time for closure, wound complications, and cosmesis. Cosmesis was evaluated by blinded evaluation of photographs of the incisions taken 4 weeks after surgery. Closure times for the TA group were faster than in the SC group (mean of 155 vs 286 seconds; P < 0.001). Wound complications were higher in the TA group (P = 0.045). Cosmesis was also felt to be better in the SC group with a score of 4.2 versus 3.88, but this did not reach statistical significance. Although the use of Dermabond did result in faster wound cultures it also resulted in an increase in wound complications. The difference in mean cosmetic score for each group was not statistically significant but trended toward better scores in the SC group. Based on these findings we do not feel Dermabond is an acceptable alternative to subcuticular suture closure in inguinal herniorrhaphy incisions.

AB - 2-Octylcyanoacrylate tissue adhesive (Dermabond™, Ethicon, Inc, Somerville, NJ) is being used successfully for closure of minor lacerations. To date, however, there have been no studies evaluating its use in the operating room for surgical incisions. We conducted a prospective randomized trial to compare the closure of inguinal herniorrhaphy incisions using 2-octylcyanoacrylate tissue adhesive (Dermabond) with closures using 4-0 Monocryl (Ethicon, Inc) in a running subcuticular closure. A total of 46 incisions were randomized at the time of closure. Of these incisions 24 were randomized to Dermabond closure (TA) and 22 were randomized to subcuticular closure (SC). Performance measures included: time for closure, wound complications, and cosmesis. Cosmesis was evaluated by blinded evaluation of photographs of the incisions taken 4 weeks after surgery. Closure times for the TA group were faster than in the SC group (mean of 155 vs 286 seconds; P < 0.001). Wound complications were higher in the TA group (P = 0.045). Cosmesis was also felt to be better in the SC group with a score of 4.2 versus 3.88, but this did not reach statistical significance. Although the use of Dermabond did result in faster wound cultures it also resulted in an increase in wound complications. The difference in mean cosmetic score for each group was not statistically significant but trended toward better scores in the SC group. Based on these findings we do not feel Dermabond is an acceptable alternative to subcuticular suture closure in inguinal herniorrhaphy incisions.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0038348617&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0038348617&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 12769218

AN - SCOPUS:0038348617

VL - 69

SP - 434

EP - 436

JO - Handbook of Behavioral Neuroscience

JF - Handbook of Behavioral Neuroscience

SN - 0003-1348

IS - 5

ER -