Suturing versus flowering technique of Bruhat after fimbrioplasty for endometriosis-related infertility

Mohamed F. Mitwally, Anusha Thotakura, Omar Abuzeid, Mohammad Ashraf, Michael P. Diamond, Mostafa Abuzeid

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The objective of this study is to compare the effectiveness of two surgical techniques (suturing versus flowering of Bruhat) after fimbrioplasty for treatment of distal tubal pathology in infertile women with endometriosis. This is a historical cohort study with 12 months of follow-up comparing pregnancy rates achieved spontaneously or after controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COS) with intrauterine insemination (IUI) in infertile women with endometriosis who underwent laparoscopic fimbrioplasty. A total of 154 patients with endometriosis-related infertility (pelvic inflammatory disease was excluded by absent history and negative Chlamydia trachomatis serology) had fimbrioplasty using salpingostomy procedure for treatment of distal tubal pathology. The edges of the fimbrial ostium were everted using either the flowering technique of Bruhat or 6-0 Vicryl sutures (intracorporeal knot) using microsurgical techniques. Forty-six patients had flowering (group 1) and 108 had suturing (group 2) technique, followed by timed intercourse and/or ovarian hyperstimulation with insemination (COS-IUI) with follow-up until pregnancy or at least 12 months. There was no significant difference in patients' characteristics (age, infertility duration, and endometriosis stage) between the two groups. The pregnancy rate per cycle or per patient and cumulative pregnancy rates were not significantly different between the two groups. There appears to be no advantage of the suturing technique over flowering after salpingostomy for fimbrioplasty. The latter method is easier to learn and requires less operative time to perform.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)147-152
Number of pages6
JournalGynecological Surgery
Volume6
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2009

Fingerprint

Endometriosis
Infertility
Insemination
Salpingostomy
Pregnancy Rate
Pathology
Polyglactin 910
Pelvic Inflammatory Disease
Chlamydia trachomatis
Serology
Operative Time
Sutures
Cohort Studies
History
Pregnancy
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • Endometriosis
  • Fimbrioplasty
  • Flowering technique of Bruhat
  • Infertility
  • Intrauterine insemination
  • Laparoscopic conservative surgery

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

Suturing versus flowering technique of Bruhat after fimbrioplasty for endometriosis-related infertility. / Mitwally, Mohamed F.; Thotakura, Anusha; Abuzeid, Omar; Ashraf, Mohammad; Diamond, Michael P.; Abuzeid, Mostafa.

In: Gynecological Surgery, Vol. 6, No. 2, 01.05.2009, p. 147-152.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Mitwally, Mohamed F. ; Thotakura, Anusha ; Abuzeid, Omar ; Ashraf, Mohammad ; Diamond, Michael P. ; Abuzeid, Mostafa. / Suturing versus flowering technique of Bruhat after fimbrioplasty for endometriosis-related infertility. In: Gynecological Surgery. 2009 ; Vol. 6, No. 2. pp. 147-152.
@article{b1a077e7a31f41cb9671dd9136cf8144,
title = "Suturing versus flowering technique of Bruhat after fimbrioplasty for endometriosis-related infertility",
abstract = "The objective of this study is to compare the effectiveness of two surgical techniques (suturing versus flowering of Bruhat) after fimbrioplasty for treatment of distal tubal pathology in infertile women with endometriosis. This is a historical cohort study with 12 months of follow-up comparing pregnancy rates achieved spontaneously or after controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COS) with intrauterine insemination (IUI) in infertile women with endometriosis who underwent laparoscopic fimbrioplasty. A total of 154 patients with endometriosis-related infertility (pelvic inflammatory disease was excluded by absent history and negative Chlamydia trachomatis serology) had fimbrioplasty using salpingostomy procedure for treatment of distal tubal pathology. The edges of the fimbrial ostium were everted using either the flowering technique of Bruhat or 6-0 Vicryl sutures (intracorporeal knot) using microsurgical techniques. Forty-six patients had flowering (group 1) and 108 had suturing (group 2) technique, followed by timed intercourse and/or ovarian hyperstimulation with insemination (COS-IUI) with follow-up until pregnancy or at least 12 months. There was no significant difference in patients' characteristics (age, infertility duration, and endometriosis stage) between the two groups. The pregnancy rate per cycle or per patient and cumulative pregnancy rates were not significantly different between the two groups. There appears to be no advantage of the suturing technique over flowering after salpingostomy for fimbrioplasty. The latter method is easier to learn and requires less operative time to perform.",
keywords = "Endometriosis, Fimbrioplasty, Flowering technique of Bruhat, Infertility, Intrauterine insemination, Laparoscopic conservative surgery",
author = "Mitwally, {Mohamed F.} and Anusha Thotakura and Omar Abuzeid and Mohammad Ashraf and Diamond, {Michael P.} and Mostafa Abuzeid",
year = "2009",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s10397-008-0433-7",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "6",
pages = "147--152",
journal = "Gynecological Surgery",
issn = "1613-2076",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Suturing versus flowering technique of Bruhat after fimbrioplasty for endometriosis-related infertility

AU - Mitwally, Mohamed F.

AU - Thotakura, Anusha

AU - Abuzeid, Omar

AU - Ashraf, Mohammad

AU - Diamond, Michael P.

AU - Abuzeid, Mostafa

PY - 2009/5/1

Y1 - 2009/5/1

N2 - The objective of this study is to compare the effectiveness of two surgical techniques (suturing versus flowering of Bruhat) after fimbrioplasty for treatment of distal tubal pathology in infertile women with endometriosis. This is a historical cohort study with 12 months of follow-up comparing pregnancy rates achieved spontaneously or after controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COS) with intrauterine insemination (IUI) in infertile women with endometriosis who underwent laparoscopic fimbrioplasty. A total of 154 patients with endometriosis-related infertility (pelvic inflammatory disease was excluded by absent history and negative Chlamydia trachomatis serology) had fimbrioplasty using salpingostomy procedure for treatment of distal tubal pathology. The edges of the fimbrial ostium were everted using either the flowering technique of Bruhat or 6-0 Vicryl sutures (intracorporeal knot) using microsurgical techniques. Forty-six patients had flowering (group 1) and 108 had suturing (group 2) technique, followed by timed intercourse and/or ovarian hyperstimulation with insemination (COS-IUI) with follow-up until pregnancy or at least 12 months. There was no significant difference in patients' characteristics (age, infertility duration, and endometriosis stage) between the two groups. The pregnancy rate per cycle or per patient and cumulative pregnancy rates were not significantly different between the two groups. There appears to be no advantage of the suturing technique over flowering after salpingostomy for fimbrioplasty. The latter method is easier to learn and requires less operative time to perform.

AB - The objective of this study is to compare the effectiveness of two surgical techniques (suturing versus flowering of Bruhat) after fimbrioplasty for treatment of distal tubal pathology in infertile women with endometriosis. This is a historical cohort study with 12 months of follow-up comparing pregnancy rates achieved spontaneously or after controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COS) with intrauterine insemination (IUI) in infertile women with endometriosis who underwent laparoscopic fimbrioplasty. A total of 154 patients with endometriosis-related infertility (pelvic inflammatory disease was excluded by absent history and negative Chlamydia trachomatis serology) had fimbrioplasty using salpingostomy procedure for treatment of distal tubal pathology. The edges of the fimbrial ostium were everted using either the flowering technique of Bruhat or 6-0 Vicryl sutures (intracorporeal knot) using microsurgical techniques. Forty-six patients had flowering (group 1) and 108 had suturing (group 2) technique, followed by timed intercourse and/or ovarian hyperstimulation with insemination (COS-IUI) with follow-up until pregnancy or at least 12 months. There was no significant difference in patients' characteristics (age, infertility duration, and endometriosis stage) between the two groups. The pregnancy rate per cycle or per patient and cumulative pregnancy rates were not significantly different between the two groups. There appears to be no advantage of the suturing technique over flowering after salpingostomy for fimbrioplasty. The latter method is easier to learn and requires less operative time to perform.

KW - Endometriosis

KW - Fimbrioplasty

KW - Flowering technique of Bruhat

KW - Infertility

KW - Intrauterine insemination

KW - Laparoscopic conservative surgery

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=67349188122&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=67349188122&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10397-008-0433-7

DO - 10.1007/s10397-008-0433-7

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:67349188122

VL - 6

SP - 147

EP - 152

JO - Gynecological Surgery

JF - Gynecological Surgery

SN - 1613-2076

IS - 2

ER -