Systematic review of non-invasive cardiovascular imaging in the diagnosis of constrictive pericarditis

Sivakumar Ardhanari, Bharath Yarlagadda, Vishal Parikh, Kevin C. Dellsperger, Anand Chockalingam, Sudarshan Balla, Senthil Kumar

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background Diagnosis of constrictive pericarditis (CP) can be challenging. It can be nearly impossible to distinguish CP from other causes of right heart failure. Although various imaging modalities help in the diagnosis, no test is definitive. Several reviews have addressed the role of various imaging techniques in the diagnosis of CP but a systematic review has not yet been published. Objective Our intention was to study the ability of various non-invasive imaging modalities to diagnose CP in patients with surgically confirmed disease and to apply our findings to develop a clinically useful diagnostic algorithm. Methods A PubMed (NLM) search was performed with MeSH term “constrictive pericarditis”. Original articles that investigated the ability of various cardiovascular imaging modalities to noninvasively diagnose surgically confirmed CP were included in our review. Investigations that included any cases without surgical confirmation were excluded. Results The PubMed search yielded 3001 results with MeSH term “constrictive pericarditis” (January 8, 2016). We identified (40) studies on CP that matched our inclusion criteria. We summarized our results sorted by individual non-invasive CV imaging modalities – echocardiography, cardiac computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Under each imaging modality, we grouped our discussion based on different parameters useful in CP diagnosis. Conclusions In conclusion, contemporary diagnosis of CP is based on clinical features and echocardiography. Cardiac MRI is recommended in patients where echocardiography is not diagnostic. Both cardiac MRI and CT can guide surgical planning but we prefer MRI as it provides both structural and functional information.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)57-67
Number of pages11
JournalIndian Heart Journal
Volume69
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2017

Fingerprint

Constrictive Pericarditis
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Echocardiography
Aptitude
PubMed
Tomography
Heart Failure

Keywords

  • Cardiac computed tomography
  • Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging
  • Cardiovascular imaging
  • Constrictive pericarditis
  • Echocardiography

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Ardhanari, S., Yarlagadda, B., Parikh, V., Dellsperger, K. C., Chockalingam, A., Balla, S., & Kumar, S. (2017). Systematic review of non-invasive cardiovascular imaging in the diagnosis of constrictive pericarditis. Indian Heart Journal, 69(1), 57-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ihj.2016.06.004

Systematic review of non-invasive cardiovascular imaging in the diagnosis of constrictive pericarditis. / Ardhanari, Sivakumar; Yarlagadda, Bharath; Parikh, Vishal; Dellsperger, Kevin C.; Chockalingam, Anand; Balla, Sudarshan; Kumar, Senthil.

In: Indian Heart Journal, Vol. 69, No. 1, 01.01.2017, p. 57-67.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ardhanari, S, Yarlagadda, B, Parikh, V, Dellsperger, KC, Chockalingam, A, Balla, S & Kumar, S 2017, 'Systematic review of non-invasive cardiovascular imaging in the diagnosis of constrictive pericarditis', Indian Heart Journal, vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 57-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ihj.2016.06.004
Ardhanari S, Yarlagadda B, Parikh V, Dellsperger KC, Chockalingam A, Balla S et al. Systematic review of non-invasive cardiovascular imaging in the diagnosis of constrictive pericarditis. Indian Heart Journal. 2017 Jan 1;69(1):57-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ihj.2016.06.004
Ardhanari, Sivakumar ; Yarlagadda, Bharath ; Parikh, Vishal ; Dellsperger, Kevin C. ; Chockalingam, Anand ; Balla, Sudarshan ; Kumar, Senthil. / Systematic review of non-invasive cardiovascular imaging in the diagnosis of constrictive pericarditis. In: Indian Heart Journal. 2017 ; Vol. 69, No. 1. pp. 57-67.
@article{4fa7d6a49c0c467281cc31c5bfa7d6e2,
title = "Systematic review of non-invasive cardiovascular imaging in the diagnosis of constrictive pericarditis",
abstract = "Background Diagnosis of constrictive pericarditis (CP) can be challenging. It can be nearly impossible to distinguish CP from other causes of right heart failure. Although various imaging modalities help in the diagnosis, no test is definitive. Several reviews have addressed the role of various imaging techniques in the diagnosis of CP but a systematic review has not yet been published. Objective Our intention was to study the ability of various non-invasive imaging modalities to diagnose CP in patients with surgically confirmed disease and to apply our findings to develop a clinically useful diagnostic algorithm. Methods A PubMed (NLM) search was performed with MeSH term “constrictive pericarditis”. Original articles that investigated the ability of various cardiovascular imaging modalities to noninvasively diagnose surgically confirmed CP were included in our review. Investigations that included any cases without surgical confirmation were excluded. Results The PubMed search yielded 3001 results with MeSH term “constrictive pericarditis” (January 8, 2016). We identified (40) studies on CP that matched our inclusion criteria. We summarized our results sorted by individual non-invasive CV imaging modalities – echocardiography, cardiac computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Under each imaging modality, we grouped our discussion based on different parameters useful in CP diagnosis. Conclusions In conclusion, contemporary diagnosis of CP is based on clinical features and echocardiography. Cardiac MRI is recommended in patients where echocardiography is not diagnostic. Both cardiac MRI and CT can guide surgical planning but we prefer MRI as it provides both structural and functional information.",
keywords = "Cardiac computed tomography, Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, Cardiovascular imaging, Constrictive pericarditis, Echocardiography",
author = "Sivakumar Ardhanari and Bharath Yarlagadda and Vishal Parikh and Dellsperger, {Kevin C.} and Anand Chockalingam and Sudarshan Balla and Senthil Kumar",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ihj.2016.06.004",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "69",
pages = "57--67",
journal = "Indian Heart Journal",
issn = "0019-4832",
publisher = "Cardiology Society of India",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Systematic review of non-invasive cardiovascular imaging in the diagnosis of constrictive pericarditis

AU - Ardhanari, Sivakumar

AU - Yarlagadda, Bharath

AU - Parikh, Vishal

AU - Dellsperger, Kevin C.

AU - Chockalingam, Anand

AU - Balla, Sudarshan

AU - Kumar, Senthil

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - Background Diagnosis of constrictive pericarditis (CP) can be challenging. It can be nearly impossible to distinguish CP from other causes of right heart failure. Although various imaging modalities help in the diagnosis, no test is definitive. Several reviews have addressed the role of various imaging techniques in the diagnosis of CP but a systematic review has not yet been published. Objective Our intention was to study the ability of various non-invasive imaging modalities to diagnose CP in patients with surgically confirmed disease and to apply our findings to develop a clinically useful diagnostic algorithm. Methods A PubMed (NLM) search was performed with MeSH term “constrictive pericarditis”. Original articles that investigated the ability of various cardiovascular imaging modalities to noninvasively diagnose surgically confirmed CP were included in our review. Investigations that included any cases without surgical confirmation were excluded. Results The PubMed search yielded 3001 results with MeSH term “constrictive pericarditis” (January 8, 2016). We identified (40) studies on CP that matched our inclusion criteria. We summarized our results sorted by individual non-invasive CV imaging modalities – echocardiography, cardiac computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Under each imaging modality, we grouped our discussion based on different parameters useful in CP diagnosis. Conclusions In conclusion, contemporary diagnosis of CP is based on clinical features and echocardiography. Cardiac MRI is recommended in patients where echocardiography is not diagnostic. Both cardiac MRI and CT can guide surgical planning but we prefer MRI as it provides both structural and functional information.

AB - Background Diagnosis of constrictive pericarditis (CP) can be challenging. It can be nearly impossible to distinguish CP from other causes of right heart failure. Although various imaging modalities help in the diagnosis, no test is definitive. Several reviews have addressed the role of various imaging techniques in the diagnosis of CP but a systematic review has not yet been published. Objective Our intention was to study the ability of various non-invasive imaging modalities to diagnose CP in patients with surgically confirmed disease and to apply our findings to develop a clinically useful diagnostic algorithm. Methods A PubMed (NLM) search was performed with MeSH term “constrictive pericarditis”. Original articles that investigated the ability of various cardiovascular imaging modalities to noninvasively diagnose surgically confirmed CP were included in our review. Investigations that included any cases without surgical confirmation were excluded. Results The PubMed search yielded 3001 results with MeSH term “constrictive pericarditis” (January 8, 2016). We identified (40) studies on CP that matched our inclusion criteria. We summarized our results sorted by individual non-invasive CV imaging modalities – echocardiography, cardiac computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Under each imaging modality, we grouped our discussion based on different parameters useful in CP diagnosis. Conclusions In conclusion, contemporary diagnosis of CP is based on clinical features and echocardiography. Cardiac MRI is recommended in patients where echocardiography is not diagnostic. Both cardiac MRI and CT can guide surgical planning but we prefer MRI as it provides both structural and functional information.

KW - Cardiac computed tomography

KW - Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging

KW - Cardiovascular imaging

KW - Constrictive pericarditis

KW - Echocardiography

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84977641032&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84977641032&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ihj.2016.06.004

DO - 10.1016/j.ihj.2016.06.004

M3 - Article

C2 - 28228308

AN - SCOPUS:84977641032

VL - 69

SP - 57

EP - 67

JO - Indian Heart Journal

JF - Indian Heart Journal

SN - 0019-4832

IS - 1

ER -